It's an embarassment this is taken seriously.

It uses galvo chikin wire instead of steel.

The structure is different to the building in so very many ways.

Where's the scaling corrections? That fondue warming fire would never have made the metal get as hot.

What's the point of explaining it? Some of the best minds have already worked on this problem and somehow I trust them more than some bucket chemist on the net with an agenda to fill.

Chickens everywhere are embarrassed by the use of their wire in the use of this experiment.

Ah, but there's a flaw in your argument:

Twasn't chicken wire, it was [b]rabbit fencing![/b] - a much more robust product and therefore a much better simulation of the steel structure of the Twin Towers. (yeah, right!)

We'll just ignore the pitiful nature of his 'fire' and the fact that you can not come remotely near simulating the blast furnace effect of a closed tube with only a few holes in it by using a square of open mesh.

I laughed hard when I saw it, but I'm not sure if it was because the "experiment" was so lame, or that it is being taken seriously by anybody with no more than two adjacent functioning brain cells.

I love how he responded, that people were only upset about that post, and that they weren't tackling his other "experiements," like the one that supposedly "proved" that the video was doctored (no planes hit the towers).

Is there an award for the dumbest DU post? I doubt this guy would win but he should at least be nominated.

Someone mentioned that the guy is a biomedical researcher. I wonder if this is representative of the quality of research he does on the job? If so I think there's a stem cell research position open in South Korea.