Gas Prices | Main | Need help from a handy person!
April 26, 2006
Holy crap!
As a very frequent flier, Fausta's discovery of Airbus plans to make us stand up during flights to cram more people in is absolutely horrifiying.
Well, they do let you lean your butt against something - not sure what you call it - certainly *not* a seat! And there is nowhere to stow carryon luggage. And since you don't have a lap if you're standing - gawd - you can't even use your laptop.
And the children ... what about the children? Are they going to stand on top of each other?
How can anyone read in that position, or nap? Next thing you know they will load us into planes, hook us up to catheters so we don't have to walk to the restroom, thereby eliminating aisles, and strapping us to the standing room only 'seats' - and our feet stapled to the floor and our mouths duct taped so as not to bother the flight attendants.
Gahhhhh!
Posted by Beth at April 26, 2006 8:42 AM
Comments
what about the children? Are they going to stand on top of each other?
Don't give them any ideas, Beth!
Posted by: Fausta at April 26, 2006 11:19 AM
I think you're missing some rather sinister element to this guys.
Remember the 'War on Fat People' La Schlussel joined with a bunch of other bigots? Well, how many of you could lean on a bar stool(which is what this kind of sounds like) or against a wall? If you're standing how much room are they going to allow for you(remember, they tend to assume an 'avg size' and design from there. In this case they'll likely use a cylinder of about 40in in diameter).
I'm only liking this for something like the commuter flights from some sattelite airport to a main one of no more than 45 min duration.
I know airlines think they'll make more money by packing people in like sardines,but they might want to look at premiums for GIVING PEOPLE MORE ROOM.
Of course, I hate most peoples carryon luggage so the fact that there's nowhere to put it doesn't bother me. If it ain't made of porcelain put it in the belly of the bird.
Posted by: ry at April 26, 2006 2:20 PM
This could actually be a good thing.
Airbus will spend millions, if not billions, developing this bird. Some airline will spend millions to buy one (or more).
If, at that point, they then find that essentially no one will pay to fly on it... well, that's the good thing. ;)
Posted by: KCSteve at April 27, 2006 1:33 PM
In this case they'll likely use a cylinder of about 40in in diameter
It wouldn't fit. The illustration shows only 25" between seats...um, rests.
It looks like the kind of idea that people who travel in private jets would come up with to keep "their" runways from being clogged. Squeezing the more of "little people" (literally in this case) into fewer planes would make for less time waiting to take off or land.
Posted by: marybeth at April 27, 2006 8:59 PM
Sedation, Beth. Then they stack 'em up like cordwood. Actually, I've been on some flights where I'd've preferred it.
Posted by: Dave Schuler at April 28, 2006 4:35 PM
Gosh, this makes me feel so old. I remember being a little kid and only riding in airplanes to go to funerals, because, well, air travel was risky and expensive. Very conflicting emotions, there, the death-trip ones against the "oh cool I get to fly" ones. Yes, I remember when airports smelled like gasoline, not kerosene. I remember riding in the "smoker" section of old Delta Douglas DC-6Bs, with the door to the flight deck open at all times, and being invited up forrard there to look at the gauges and blinkenlights. Sigh. I hate living in a Doodah Police State.
(I could maybe put up with a *serious* Police State.)
Posted by: Justthisguy at April 30, 2006 12:50 AM
Umm, when I wrote *serious* above, I meant "non-silly" and "rational". I'm afraid that our masters are more and more silly and irrational. Anarcho-tyranny, I believe Dr. Pournelle calls it.
Posted by: Justthisguy at April 30, 2006 1:04 AM
