A long day of work! | Main | Is it time to discuss adoption again?

August 4, 2005

I'm not a Lawyer

or a law professor.

I am an adopted child - although more than grown up at 52 - and I am really fed up with the constant reference to the Roberts' adopted children.

If the MSM and politicians could only be sensitive to adopted children and simply refer to them as the children of Judge and Mrs. Roberts.

Believe me. Adopted children don't want to be pointed out by strangers as 'adopted'. And the parents who adopt those children love them every bit as much as any biological chld.

Judge and Mrs. Robert's children are beautiful, active little kids. They looked great in pastels for a fancy occassion when President Bush announced the nomination. Mrs. Roberts looked great, too.

In a family, it matters not if one is adopted or not - a daughter is a daughter and a son is a son.

Update: Michelle Malkin has a post with a lot emails from concerned adoptive parents - or as I prefer to say - parents - real parents - real moms and dads who are raising their real children. It's worth the read.

Posted by Beth at August 4, 2005 9:35 PM

Comments

Hear, hear.

I actually wrote a letter to Dear Abby about ten years ago about this... some woman had written in complaining about how rotten "her adopted son" was turning out to be... I bristled at that! No wonder he was acting out; I would, too, if I were constantly being reminded that I didn't REALLY belong. PULLEEEZE.

Two of my three kids joined us via the miracle of adoption, and they aren't any less MINE than the one who joined us the other way.

Posted by: GradualDazzle at August 4, 2005 10:45 PM

"Hear, hear!" is exactly the thought I had as well. Funny how that works, but I agree with you entirely and can't express it better.

Posted by: rammer at August 4, 2005 11:40 PM

Thank you!

Posted by: pam at August 5, 2005 11:02 AM

Awesome, Beth.

One of my son's best babyhood friends was a little girl adopted by a single mom. The mom was blonde haired, blue eyed. The little girl, who is foreign, is dark skinned, has jet black curly hair, and big dark brown eyes. They looked nothing alike, but I've never seen a closer bond between a mother and child. Julianna even gave Thomas his first nickname- Toadie. When she tried to say "Thomas", "Toadie" was the closest she could come. It stuck. And I proudly became "Toadie Mommy". Our Thomas picked up on her cues, and started calling my mom "Mema". Julianna called her aunt "MeMe", and Thomas modified it to fit his needs.

The point is, we couldn't have loved Julianna any more or less if her Mom had given birth to her. In many ways... she did. She gave her life, and a home, and a family. And she got to CHOOSE her child. Being the egg donor doesn't make you a mother any more than being the sperm donor makes you a father. What matters is how you raise and love your children.

Posted by: AFSister at August 5, 2005 12:03 PM

My real parents were the people who raised me. Similarly, Tara's real Daddy is the man who has been supporting her for the last few years.

I love my daughter, but the fact that she is biologically related to me would not stop me loving an adopted child as if she were my own, because that child would be my own as I see it.

Posted by: Sally at August 5, 2005 3:42 PM

I'm adopted, too, Beth. My parents had three non-adopted children before me. Throughout my childhood, my extended families on both parents' side would always referred to me as "the adopted girl, Kate." It was bad enough that I looked very different from my parents and siblings (they're all quite tall, blonde and with blue eyes while I'm short, brown and brown).

Always being reminded that I wasn't one of the "natural-born" kids ensured that I felt excluded, like I didn't belong anywhere.

It probably doesn't surprise anyone (besides them) that, having never felt like part of their family, I don't talk to a single one of them anymore.

Posted by: Venomous Kate at August 5, 2005 4:24 PM

I agree with what you said, Beth. Although it obviously depends on the family, as the above post by Kate shows.

My husband was adopted. But he is my in-law's child. They just didn't birth him.

I wish they would leave the children alone. What is it about the news that they want to make up some problem if there isn't one? Did anyone else's family get this kind of scrutiny?

Posted by: Suzi at August 5, 2005 10:11 PM

The NY Times and the Democrats were on a fishing expedition to see if they could dig up some dirt on John Roberts. Harming a couple of kids while trying to gain political advantage is no big deal to the slimes.

Posted by: Bigandmean at August 6, 2005 1:00 AM