December 30, 2006
H&I* Fires DEC 30, 2006
Open post for those with something to share, updated through the day. New, complete posts come in below this one. Note: If trackbacking, please acknowledge this post in your post. That's only polite. [Admittedly, I'm fibbing. Trackbacks are still broken]
You're advertising here, we should get an ad at your place...
************************
Froggy has started a firestorm over at B5 with his complaint about the ROE(rules of engagement) our Boys and Girls work under. Me? I'm with Kat-Mizzou and Skippy-san in the comments (most of which aren't worth the effort, but there's some good stuff in there). The full spectrum of the conflict must be considered and not just the tip of the spear. That doesn't mean that the two aspects, tip of the spear and the overall politics, shouldn't have an interplay though. They should. Which is what Skippy and Kat along with Froggy are arguing.
--------------------------------
Oh, and did you know that wanting 'violent retaliation' for 9/11 was bad for your health? Scientists say so, and so it must be true. Phhhhpppppt.
ry
**********************
Project Valour-IT - money well spent. -the Armorer
*********************
Reporting the war, MSM-style, as observed by Greyhawk.
Unlike in 1943-45, when there were thousands of them - there is only one are only two flyable Lancaster bombers. And those gnomes who spend their spare time poring over the commercial satellite imagery looking for things like airplanes in flight and military installations - found one, flying, in Google Maps. H/t, Monteith. -the Armorer [Update, Check out CAPT H's comment]
********************

Speaking of odd things found in Google Earth... how about that Chinese Nimitz-class aircraft carrier you (and the Navy) didn't know they had?
[Update - CAPT H points out another rogue Nimitiz. ] -the Armorer
********************
What? No Hussein swinging from a Star entry?
True to the last he had to argue, but he still ended up doing the Tyburn Two Step
C'mon, thats the best Christmas present I've seen all year!
Yes folks, Ding Dong the witch is dead.
Until we find out that his buddies hijacked him during the moment of truth and he's going to start leading the "Rebellion"
Until then, its a nice feeling knowing there's one less HVT out there.
Enjoy it.
Fillean meal ar an meallaire!
-BloodSpite
Flash Traffic (extended entry) Follows... »
*A term of art from the artillery. Harassment and Interdiction Fires.
Back in the day, when you could just kill people and break things without a note from a lawyer, they were pre-planned, but to the enemy, random, fires at known gathering points, road junctions, Main Supply Routes, assembly areas, etc - to keep the bad guy nervous that the world around him might start exploding at any minute.
Not really relevant to today's operating environment, right? But, it *is*
The UAVs we fly over Afghanistan and Pakistan looking for targets of opportunity are a form of H&I fires, if you really want to parse it finely. We just have better sensors and fire control now.
I call the post that because it's random things posted by me and people I've given posting privileges to. It's also an open trackback, so if (Don Surber uses it this way a lot) someone has a post they're proud of, but it really isn't either Castle kind of stuff, or topical to a particular post, I've basically given blanket permission to use that post for that purpose. Another term of art that might be appropriate is "Free Fire Zone".
« Secure this line!
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! »
Oh dear ...
The GoogleEarth image is probably of the Lancaster (PA 474) flying with the Battle of Britain Memorial Flight with further details here .
However, in TundraLand, we have the Mynarski Lancaster (KB 726) flown by the Canadian Warplane Heritage Museum. I have enjoyed seeing it in flight several times. Hurricane + Spit + Lanc = 6 Merlins in full song.
For those who travel, the CWHM is in Hamilton, Ontario. Further info: click here.
Cheers,
posted by
J.M. Heinrichs on December 30, 2006 12:04 PM
Sic Semper Errata, round here.
posted by
John of Argghhh! on December 30, 2006 12:23 PM
Ry - I've been following Froggy's thoughts on ROE. Did you read the other post?
I am decidely in his camp.
posted by
Maggi on December 30, 2006 03:20 PM
I posted the GoogleEarth link elsewhere, and the immediate response from some fairly savvy people was skepticism, based on the point that the bomber's shadow isn't readily visible. Can anyone here make a stab as to how high the bomber is, and therefore roughly where one should look to find the shadow?
posted by
wolfwalker on December 31, 2006 10:55 AM
If it *is* spoofed, then it happened at the original provider (some sattellite imaging company), or is in in-house Google prank. I have no idea how high the thing is.
posted by
John of Argghhh! on December 31, 2006 10:58 AM
Well Maggs, all I can say is that there's a time for pugnacious and then there's a time for a more subtle style of leadership/strategy. There's places for both. I want pugnacious in spades in the Tip o' The Spear guys, but not so much in other slots. Laying waste about you isn't always the best way. Alexander the Great was a fine killer and as savage as any would've like, but he also worked the other ends to secure what he took by the sword from the Persian empire.
Don't get me wrong. Froggy's no dummy and nobody can ever question the man's courage or skill---SEALs aren't couch potatoes afterall(unlike pudgy ol' gollum, who giggles like the Pillsbury Doughboy). But he's using a track of thought that's been largely discredited. Strategic Bombing to sap the will to fight was based on the same reasoning. Didn't work. Neither did nuclear brinkmanship by Eisenhower against the Chinese in the 50s. Froggy's a great guy with whom I often agree with, but he and his argument are simply and demonstrably wrong on this.
At the end of the day though I hope people remember that we're really on the same side: we want victory with the lowest number of US casualties to attain that victory. We just disagree as the method to proceed to it.
posted by
ry on January 1, 2007 02:46 PM
Strongly second JM's comment about seeing the CWHM in Hamnilton. Wife and I drove up there (accidentally) and caught the museum durig a celebration. We bought memberships the same day.
Nothing sends goosebumps up the spine like four Merlins synchronized during take off. And for the rich among us, I believe for a pretty reasonable - somewhere in the low four figures - sum you can get a flight in the Lanc at certain times of the year.
posted by
emdfl on January 1, 2007 06:35 PM
« Dismissed, Soldier!
Another soldier joins the crowd at Fiddler's Green.
A loss among the readers here at Castle Argghhh!...
Armorer Donovan,
Wednesday, December 20, former Staff Sergeant George Brown, Cannon Company, 422 Infantry Regiment, 106th Inf. Div., passed from this vale. You know their story as you featured highlights of it last week.
If you have access to a 105, would you fire off a round for an old cannon cocker? He had his rifle salute and a real bugler but I would dearly have loved to touch off a round. If not, just raise a cup of kindness.
Thank you for the Castle. To you and yours, I wish a Happy New Year.

SC 256443 - Sheltered by a camouflage net, GIs of the Cannon Company, 9th Infantry, 2d Infantry Division, fire their howitzer on Brest. A German garrison has held out there for four weeks against the Allied attack. Piles of shell cases are in the foreground. 1944 (Photo courtesy US Army Center for Military History
A hi-res pic can be had here.
The soldiers of the 106th (Golden Lions) Infantry Division took it in the shorts during the Battle of the Bulge. A brand-new division, it had entered the lines for the first time 5 days before the Germans attacked.
They were smashed to flinders, the Division being virtually obliterated. But they went down fighting, every bit as hard as Prentiss went down at the Hornet's Nest at Shiloh. Like Prentiss, eventually surrendering, but buying the time Eisenhower and Montgomery needed, just as Prentiss bought Grant and Sherman the time they needed to rally the Union Army and finally beat the Southern troops back.
Field Marshall Montgomery of Alamein noted their courage:
The American soldiers of the... 106th Infantry Division stuck it out and put up a fine performance. By jove, they stuck it out, those chaps.
Staff Sergeant George Brown was a Golden Lion, and like lions they fought.
And this was his weapon.

A United States M3 Howitzer outside the Army Museum in Honolulu, Hawaii. 5 October 2006 Photographer Max Smith (Photo courtesy of the photographer)
I don't have access to a shootable gun - but I will provide this sound of thunder.
[Update: I found this - a 21 gun salute to the Queen - but the guns are a more appropriate caliber...]
[sound of smashing shot glass]
Now is the time at Castle Argghhh! when we dance: In Memoriam.
Cannon Companies were unique to the WWII Infantry Regiment structure. The Cannon Company of a regiment was first equipped with two halftrack-mounted 105mm howitzers and six halftrack-mounted 75mm howitzers. Later in the war these were replaced with 6 of the M3 105mm towed howitzer, a short-barreled 105 mm gun. Literally short-barreled - the gun was the standard 105mm howitzer barrel, cut-off at the bearing ring, mounted on the recoil mechanism of the Pack 75, and mounted on a lighter mount similar to the 57mm anti-tank gun carriage. Truly a hybrid. The Cannon Companies were an attempt to balance the need for flexible fires with the need to mass fires for maximum effect. The general proposition is that artillery is most effective when fires are massed and controlled centrally - but that comes at the cost of responsiveness. The cannon companies were the product US industrial strength. We could give our forces artillery firepower in amounts everybody but the Russians (who also believed in artillery as the Red God of War) would envy. We allowed the regiments 6 M3 howitzers, while the Division Artillery had 36 M2 105mm howitzers and 12 M1 155mm howitzers.
In my time, focused as we were on the massive Slavic horde, centralization and control were the order of the day, and the heavy divisions were organized with 54 (later 72) 155mm howitzers and 12 (later 18) 8inch howitzers. While each brigade (the equivalent of the WWII regiment) had a battalion of guns in direct support, it didn't actually own the guns and the battalion was used for other purposes when a brigade was in reserve. The Cannon Companies were organic to the Regiment they had complete control.
The exception to this during my day (because the tension still existed between mass and responsiveness) were the Cavalry units, which had organic batteries of self-propelled 155mm cannon. Those were the plum jobs to get as a company-grade Redleg in Europe - command of a "HowBat", or howitzer battery.
The wheel has come full circle, with a twist. In the modular force, the way the Army is reconfiguring itself, the artillery once again belongs to the brigade commander. The Division Artillery is a rump of it's former self, but, via it's digital comms, still acts as the agency of massing fires and long range planning. And because artillery ammunition is heavy, we're rapidly pushing ourselves to carrying almost nothing but precision munitions - which, as we all know, kill quicker, cleaner, and with less collateral damage.
Because, again, we're never going to face a horde again.
Well, at least not in the short term. And if we do, the Air Force will be the provider of massed fires, in all weather, 24/7.
So, guys like me are a dying breed, mammoths all!
It strikes me - that if the Fort does a 21-gun salute for President Ford, I should try to get there with the video camera.
Flash Traffic (extended entry) Follows... »
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! »
That would be way kewl and maybe we can add the gun salutes to the sounds of taps?
Just sayin...
posted by
Cricket on December 30, 2006 08:31 PM
The Fort will have both the 21 gun salute and the 50 gun salute. I believe it is on the 3rd.
posted by
JimC on December 30, 2006 08:58 PM
Ah, also an Airborne 105, as was used at Arnhem, and other places. Audrey Hepburn may have heard loud noises caused by guns like that one.
posted by
Justthisguy on January 1, 2007 02:13 AM
« Dismissed, Soldier!
December 29, 2006
H*I Fires 29 Dec 2006
Open post for those with something to share, updated through the day. New, complete posts come in below this one. Note: If trackbacking, please acknowledge this post in your post. That's only polite. [Admittedly, I'm fibbing. Trackbacks are still broken]
You're advertising here, we should get an ad at your place...
************************************
1SG Keith got a "Merry Christmas" comment from Mack.... who turns out to be an "Ex British Soldier and Falklands War & Northern Ireland veteran author & Poet & Father trying to make sense of the Traumatic events in my life." Please... go visit Rogue Gunner. Watch the first two videos, entitled "Royal Marine Tribute" and "Rest In Peace" ... and remember our British counterparts in the GWOT. Thanks Mack. ~AFSis
*************
Some light-hearted info on Feline Physics for the Castle Kitties. ~Barb
*************
Someone has been reading their Mahan and taking his lessons to heart.
Unfortunately, I cannot say it is us that’s doing it but have to say it is the PLAN(People’s Liberation Army-Navy of China) that intends to do so.
ry
*************
Rumors have Saddam taking the Long Drop at sunrise in Iraq. About 9PM or so, Central. While I'm not holding my breath, it would be good news. I'm not an ovewhelming fan of the death penalty - but some people are richly deserving. Russ, over at TacJammer, looks at it from a, um, slightly different perspective. I missed this musical. -the Armorer
************************
It's official -- Saddam just took the long step. Bill
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Flash Traffic (extended entry) Follows... »
*A term of art from the artillery. Harassment and Interdiction Fires.
Back in the day, when you could just kill people and break things without a note from a lawyer, they were pre-planned, but to the enemy, random, fires at known gathering points, road junctions, Main Supply Routes, assembly areas, etc - to keep the bad guy nervous that the world around him might start exploding at any minute.
Not really relevant to today's operating environment, right? But, it *is*
The UAVs we fly over Afghanistan and Pakistan looking for targets of opportunity are a form of H&I fires, if you really want to parse it finely. We just have better sensors and fire control now.
I call the post that because it's random things posted by me and people I've given posting privileges to. It's also an open trackback, so if (Don Surber uses it this way a lot) someone has a post they're proud of, but it really isn't either Castle kind of stuff, or topical to a particular post, I've basically given blanket permission to use that post for that purpose. Another term of art that might be appropriate is "Free Fire Zone".
And someone forgot to put this in when they first set it up. I ain't naming names (looks in AFSis' direction) but someone is getting as sloppy as me. ;)--ry
« Secure this line!
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! »
He might have read Mahan, but he might be wearing the shoes of Willy 2.
Cheers
posted by
J.M. Heinrichs on December 29, 2006 02:25 PM
I don't get it JMH. My edumacation is rather incomplete, so to speak. I know it isn't funny if you have to explain it, but care to anyways?
posted by
ry on December 29, 2006 10:45 PM
can't say that *i* feel any safer now that Saddam is dead, but i do feel vindicated, and happy for the Iraqi's. they have GOT to feel safer now that he, and his sons, can't hurt them anymore. i do, however, have increased safety concerns due to backlash over Saddam's death.
posted by
AFSister on December 30, 2006 08:11 AM
- The most important political ramification to Saddam’s demise is the Sunnis no longer have a figure-head to rally around.
- So far, it appears that there will be no more or no less attacks in Baghdad…
posted by
Oldloadr on December 30, 2006 08:56 AM
Maybe I'm alone in this, but the whole Saddam execution thing seemed anticlimactic to me.
AFSis - I went over to Rogue Gunner, but I doubt he's pleased. I stepped in it over the repayment of the WWII loans between the US and GB.
Now the Chinese Navy thing.........that's scary and I've thought that for a while.
Ry - I don't know what Mr. Heinrichs means either. It must be an inside inside joke.
posted by
Maggie on December 30, 2006 10:19 AM
Willy 2 is Kaiser Wilhelm II of Germany. He was quite enthused by Mahan's ideas and decided he needed a fleet which could take on the RN. Unfortunately German Naval production never caught up to the UK and his dreams were rather dashed in WW1.
The Soviet Navy had a similar problem re the USN. Regardless of their efforts, the Red Fleet could not match the productiveness of the US warship industry; it also could not match the USN's deployability. I am yet to be convinced that the PLAN will be any different. I am not suggesting the PLAN is not a threat, I am suggesting that its threat not be inflated.
Cheers
posted by
J.M. Heinrichs on December 30, 2006 12:22 PM
China has a local source of petroleum now, in the Indonesian waters, but will soon rely on the Sakhalin Field up the western shore of the Pacific.
They may eventually build a pipeline to the Black Sea to get some of that oil, but their ships, if any, in the Black Sea would be very vulnerable (big ship on a very small ocean). If they only need a Coastal Navy to protect the supertankers which will be bringing them their Russian gas and oil, I don't see much of a need for a real Blue Water Navy, and my guess is that they won't build anything bigger than a DD. A dangerous fleet of the new quieter diesel subs is definitely a possibility, though, and with help from refuelling at Russian ports up the Kamchatka, such a fleet could pose a bad threat to shipping in the Northwest.
China can be enough of a problem with a large Littoral Navy, even if they never build a Blue Water fleet.
posted by
Rivrdog on December 31, 2006 07:53 PM
I get where you're coming from, JMH. But as we're seeing with OEF and OIF for land forces our ideas about what was necessary seem to be off. If, and its a big if, say a Hillary were to come to office and shoot ADM Mullen's plan to build back up to a 4-500 ship Navy again we could see exactly what the Sovs never did: parity in capablity.
I may have to send you some stuff from a guy I know who follow the PLAN seriously. He's done things about the PLAN carrier program and wrote something called 'Prognosis for China'. He might differ with you on CHinese capabilities, current, and have firmer sources to back it up. Give me a ring if your interested. And have a happy New Year either way, JMH.
posted by
ry on January 1, 2007 05:51 PM
« Dismissed, Soldier!
The man certainly makes use of avenues not available to his victims.
Saddam Hussein will be executed no later than Saturday, said an Iraqi judge authorized to attend his hanging. American and Iraqi officials met to set the hour of his death.
Lawyers for Saddam Hussein asked a U.S. judge to block his transfer to the custody of Iraqi officials poised to carry out his execution.
Hussein's lawyers filed documents Friday afternoon asking for a stay of execution. The 21-page request was filed in U.S. District Court in Washington before Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly.
Attorneys argued that because Hussein also faces a civil lawsuit in Washington, he has rights as a civil defendant that would be violated if he is executed. He has not received notice of those rights and the consequences that the lawsuit would have on his estate, his attorneys said.
"To protect those rights, defendant Saddam Hussein requests an order of this court providing a stay of his execution until further notice of this court," attorney Nicholas Gilman wrote.
A similar request by the former chief justice of the Revolutionary Court, Awad Hamed al-Bandar, was denied Thursday and is under appeal. Al-Bandar also faces execution. The Justice Department argued in that case that U.S. courts have no jurisdiction to interfere with the judicial process of another country.
Read the rest here, plus another discussion of the impending event here.
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! »
I figger'd you'd have the update up, John. MSM is reporting the execution carried out just before 10pm tonight in Bagdad.
I'll be praying for our troop's safety... something is bound to happen in retaliation.
posted by
AFSister on December 29, 2006 09:34 PM
He's dead now.
posted by
Trias on December 30, 2006 12:20 AM
If any one cares: Jeralyn at Talkleft, has the full briefs from the US District Court in D.C. THE PETITION & THE DENIAL.
posted by
Boquisuci on December 30, 2006 09:54 AM
« Dismissed, Soldier!
On the origins of some military traditions...
...laid out for you in preparation for President Ford's funeral.
By John J. Kruzel
American Forces Press Service
WASHINGTON, Dec. 28, 2006 - Military tradition will be evident throughout the events associated with the Dec. 26 death of former President Gerald R. Ford, as the services join the nation in bidding farewell to their former commander in chief.
Ford's three-stage state funeral will begin tomorrow [today] with the former president's remains lying in repose at St. Margaret's Episcopal Church in Palm Desert, Calif. He will then be honored in the nation's capital, and finally in his home state of Michigan, where he will be buried. Ford's casket will arrive Dec. 30 at Andrews Air Force Base, Md. A motorcade will travel through Alexandria, Va., where Ford resided while serving as a congressman and vice president. After a pause at the World War II Memorial -- Ford served in the Navy during the war -- the motorcade will proceed to the U.S. Capitol, where the former president will lie in state.
Ford's coffin will be draped in a U.S. flag, with the blue field over his left shoulder. The custom began in the Napoleonic Wars of the late 18th and early 19th centuries, when a flag was used to cover the dead as they were taken from the battlefield on a caisson.
Graveside military honors in Michigan will include the firing of three volleys each by seven servicemembers. This commonly is confused with an entirely separate honor, the 21-gun salute. But the number of individual gun firings in both honors evolved the same way.
The three volleys came from an old battlefield custom. The two warring sides would cease hostilities to clear their dead from the battlefield, and the firing of three volleys meant that the dead had been properly cared for and the side was ready to resume the battle.
The 21-gun salute traces its roots to the Anglo-Saxon empire, when seven guns constituted a recognized naval salute, as most naval vessels had seven guns. Because gunpowder in those days could be more easily stored on land than at sea, guns on land could fire three rounds for every one that could be fired by a ship at sea. [This section appears to be incomplete. IIRC, the purpose of firing the salute was to prove your guns were empty as a gesture of good faith, and assuring the land-based guns the first shot. The same reason that when Navy ships enter harbor they have the crew standing in whites around the hull - to show that not only are the guns empty, they are un-manned. Sailors correct me if I'm wrong. -the Armorer]
Later, as gunpowder and storage methods improved, salutes at sea also began using 21 guns. The United States at first used one round for each state, attaining the 21-gun salute by 1818. The nation reduced its salute to 21 guns in 1841, and formally adopted the 21-gun salute at the suggestion of the British in 1875.
An "order of arms" protocol determines the number of guns to be used in a salute. A president, ex-president or foreign head of state is saluted with 21 guns. A vice president, prime minister, secretary of defense or secretary of the Army receives a 19-gun salute. Flag officers receive salutes of 11 to 17 guns, depending on their rank. The rounds are fired one at a time.
A U.S. presidential death also involves other ceremonial gun salutes and military traditions. On the day after the death of the president, a former President or president-elect -- unless this day falls on a Sunday or holiday, in which case the honor will rendered the following day -- the commanders of Army installations with the necessary personnel and material traditionally order that one gun be fired every half hour, beginning at reveille and ending at retreat.
On the day of burial, a 21-minute gun salute traditionally is fired starting at noon at all military installations with the necessary personnel and material. Guns will be fired at one-minute intervals. Also on the day of burial, those installations will fire a 50-gun salute -- one round for each state -- at five- second intervals immediately following lowering of the flag.
The playing of "Ruffles and Flourishes" announces the arrival of a flag officer or other dignitary of honor. Drums play the ruffles, and bugles play the flourishes - one flourish for each star of the flag officer's rank or as appropriate for the honoree's position or title. Four flourishes is the highest honor.
When played for a president, "Ruffles and Flourishes" is followed by "Hail to the Chief," which is believed to have been written in England in 1810 or 1811 by James Sanderson for a play by Sir Walter Scott called "The Lady of the Lake." The play began to be performed in the United States in 1812, the song became popular, and it became a favorite of bands at festive events. It evolved to be used as a greeting for important visitors, and eventually for the president, though no record exists of when it was first put to that use.
The bugle call "Taps" originated in the Civil War with the Army of the Potomac. Union Army Brig. Gen. Daniel Butterfield didn't like the bugle call that signaled soldiers in the camp to put out the lights and go to sleep, and worked out the melody of "Taps" with his brigade bugler, Pvt. Oliver Wilcox Norton. The call later came into another use as a figurative call to the sleep of death for soldiers.
Ford will be buried with full military honors at his presidential museum in Grand Rapids, Mich., Jan. 3.
(John D. Banusiewicz of American Forces Press Service contributed to this article. Information from Web pages of the Military District of Washington and Arlington National Cemetery was used in this article.)
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! »
Thank you for the briefing, John... It's important to understand the origins of such pagentry. Even though I knew this, reading it again brings a strange comfort, a remembrance of a wee part of "Why We Do The Things We Do..."
posted by
Sgt. B. on December 29, 2006 10:19 AM
What Sgt B. said!
posted by
SangerM on December 29, 2006 11:41 AM
I always learn something new from you guys! This is definitely a good reminder of the need to know our traditions and remember the WHY of it all. I especially was interested to learn that there is a difference between the 3 volleys of 7 and a true 21-gun salute.
posted by
Barb on December 29, 2006 12:13 PM
« Dismissed, Soldier!
December 28, 2006
H&I Fires* 28 Dec 2006
Open post for those with something to share, updated through the day. New, complete posts come in below this one. Note: If trackbacking, please acknowledge this post in your post. That's only polite. [Admittedly, I'm fibbing. Trackbacks are still broken]
You're advertising here, we should get an ad at your place...
************************
The headline may change by the time this post is published, but the current one is "Report: Ford Said Iraq War is Not Justified." The quotes in the story say nothing of the sort. In a previously-embargoed interview from 2004 (now published by the WaPo), Ford says he would have preferred to push sanctions more vigorously, but regarding justification for the war, he is quoted:
Rumsfeld and Cheney and the president made a big mistake in justifying going into the war in Iraq. They put the emphasis on weapons of mass destruction... And now, I've never publicly said I thought they made a mistake, but I felt very strongly it was an error in how they should justify what they were going to do.
So it sounds to me like his disagreement is with which emphasis they used in justifying it (WMD), not that the war was unjustified/unjustifiable as an action in itself. Disgusting, disgusting headline... to twist Ford's words after he had so obviously went out of his way to not publicly criticize Bush in even the small question of political tactics... I really can't think of anything else to say that would get past the PG-17 and John's "don't attack the messenger" rules. - FbL
UPDATE: Yup, they changed it. Now it's "Ford had problems with Bush Iraq policy." The new opening paragraph says, "Former President Gerald R. Ford questioned the Bush administration's rationale for the U.S. invasion and war..." But the following paragraph just restates the old headline. However, it goes on in additional new material to make explicitly clear what he actually meant:
Saddam Hussein was an evil person and there was justification to get rid of him," he observed to the Daily News. "But we shouldn't have put the basis on weapons of destruction. That was a bad mistake. Where does (Bush) get his advice?
There's no byline on this AP article. I thought the only question was, are they blinded by bias, or just incompetent journalists? But apparently somebody has enough shame to not want to claim this piece of filth.
***********************
Great Britain pays off her WWII debt in full. I'm impressed, though I'd have thought we'd given them some credits, if nothing else, for their standing by us in the GWOT. Some commenters aren't, um, impressed. H/t, Jim C. -the Armorer
**********************
Heh. Methane and jail. Not a good combination. H/t, Mike L. -the Armorer
**********************
Flash Traffic (extended entry) Follows... »
*A term of art from the artillery. Harassment and Interdiction Fires.
Back in the day, when you could just kill people and break things without a note from a lawyer, they were pre-planned, but to the enemy, random, fires at known gathering points, road junctions, Main Supply Routes, assembly areas, etc - to keep the bad guy nervous that the world around him might start exploding at any minute.
Not really relevant to today's operating environment, right? But, it *is*
The UAVs we fly over Afghanistan and Pakistan looking for targets of opportunity are a form of H&I fires, if you really want to parse it finely. We just have better sensors and fire control now.
I call the post that because it's random things posted by me and people I've given posting privileges to. It's also an open trackback, so if (Don Surber uses it this way a lot) someone has a post they're proud of, but it really isn't either Castle kind of stuff, or topical to a particular post, I've basically given blanket permission to use that post for that purpose. Another term of art that might be appropriate is "Free Fire Zone".
« Secure this line!
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! »
I would most certainly given some credit to GB for their support.
posted by
Maggie on December 28, 2006 11:12 AM
There, now that I've turned comments back on, I can speak my piece ;-)
FbL - The AP piece is just a regurge of the WaPo piece from Woodward:
"...In his embargoed July 2004 interview with The Washington Post, Ford said the Iraq war was not justified, the Post reported Wednesday night. ..." This is typical AP cheap 'reporting' - I wouldn't be surprised if they have an automated routine on a computer that does the rewrite ... *grin*
The original WaPo piece is here.
posted by
Barb on December 28, 2006 11:20 AM
Thanks, Barb. It looks like the WaPo article is misleading unless read very closely. But the AP takes what was merely misleading and explicitly twists it. Really pathetic.
posted by
FbL on December 28, 2006 11:24 AM
Yup, already changed. "Ford had problems with Bush Iraq policy".
posted by
Sigivald on December 28, 2006 03:50 PM
Ford's words have been quite twisted and as it happens i agree with him. Maybe we need a new term for pretend journalists.
I'm disappointed the US wanted the money back. It's fair business i suppose but certainly not the way I operate. I wonder if we are paying money back. Not sure we got some but we are commonwealth after all.
posted by
Trias on December 28, 2006 06:33 PM
It takes committed leadership to hold to your promises, especially when it comes to paying your bills over the long term and despite the ups and downs in one's own economy and in relations between governments over decades. Who better to illustrate the courage of one's convictions than an Economic Secretary named Balls?
Sorry.
Couldn't resist.
I'm tired. It happens. -Instapilot
posted by
Instapilot on December 28, 2006 07:49 PM
Headline on Page 1 of this morning's fishwrapper: "Ford Opposed Iraq War." I feel a Letter to the Ed clawing its way out.
Trias - I think the only WWII debts Oz owes are ones of gratitude -- and so many owe Oz those same debts that the gratitude just keeps flowing, touching shore here and there, compounding interest. Which, in my book, is a *Very* Good Thing.
And, speaking of gratitude, seven Aussie helicopter pilots died flying with us in RVN -- four of the survivors belong to the Vietnam Helicopter Pilots' Association and we're looking to bring in the remaining twenty-three before they pull pitch for Fiddlers' Green...
posted by
BillT on December 28, 2006 08:02 PM
The debt repayment makes news because the UK had a very large bill at the end of the war. FWIW, one of my profs in 78 mentioned that only Finland and Canada had repaid their WW2 debts at that time. The question could be: who are the other debtors and what are their account standings?
Via PowerLine, a different account of President Ford's last thoughts: http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/483757p-407239c.html
Cheers
posted by
J.M. Heinrichs on December 28, 2006 08:39 PM
BillT, when that letter finishes clawing its way out please share it with us. :)
posted by
FbL on December 28, 2006 09:29 PM
When Nixon was pardoned by Ford
it left almost all of us floored.
Now both of them are
in front of God's bar --
I bet that the angels aren't bored.
posted by
Timerick on December 29, 2006 12:16 PM
« Dismissed, Soldier!
I like young Wales.
No, not a typo-damaged lust for under-age cetaceans... rather young Prince Harry of A Squadron, the Blues and Royals.
Prince Harry has threatened to quit the Army if commanders refuse to send him to the front line.
He told senior officers before recently passing out of Sandhurst as a Second Lieutenant: "If I am not allowed to join my unit in a war zone, I will hand in my uniform."
Good on you, Lieutenant. That's what I want to see in a young officer.
Of course, it isn't that simple, now is it?
Like it or not, Prince Harry is 3rd in line for the Throne of England. That makes him a very lucrative "kill or capture" target.
Okay, it's a dangerous business, isn't it? The Royal Family have thus far not been too shy about risking their own flesh and blood in service, witness Prince Andrew in the Falklands.
So, the concern twists itself to another angle - would Lieutenant Wales' presence put his troops at greater risk, as the jihadis try to score the Big One?
That is a concern expressed by the senior leadership, for whom such things really are important.
The embarrassment for the Army caused by him quitting would be matched by uproar at the notion that while ordinary citizens are allowed to that their main problem is not whether Harry can take the pressure of coming under fire in action – but whether the lives of the men fighting alongside him will be more at risk because he is regarded as a ‘trophy target’ by insurgents.
One experienced commander said: "Second Lt Wales will, as far as is possible, be treated like any other officer but there has to be a line drawn as to whether the men he leads might experience extra danger due to his presence. Decisions will be taken by commanding officers based on an accurate risk assessment at the time."
The Sun is reporting that Prince Harry may go to Afstan with his unit. And, that soldiers are supportive of his deploying.
Officially, the Ministry of Defence insists that a final decision about whether second lieutenant Harry will be allowed to fight in Iraq has yet to be made.
The Prince has always said he is determined to do battle with his 100-strong unit, A Squadron of the Blues and Royals — part of the Household Cavalry.
They begin a six-month tour of Iraq in the spring. And before that, they are expected to take part in war games and exhaustive preparations for conflict.
The decision over the young Royal is deemed so important it will be made by the Army’s top man, Chief of the General Staff General Sir Richard Dannatt.
But a bandwagon of popular support is growing among the ranks to allow Harry to fulfil his dream of active service. Despite alarm over the possibility of putting the Prince’s life in danger, top brass will find that hard to refuse.
I say Lieutenant Wales is either a member of the unit, or not. If he is, then he should deploy with them, and not send them out with a newbie who hasn't trained with the unit.
If it turns out that every splodey-dope jihadi with a belt of explosives want to martyr themselves - that can be sorted out on the ground over there, based on the actual risks, vice the "might be a problems".
It's a war. Let's not forget the moral(e) aspects. There are some considerations that transcend.
Let Wales fight.
H/t, Heartless Libertarian.
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! »
I think that he should deploy and fight with his unit. If the commanders didn't want him to go, then they should not have permitted him to join the unit - knowing it would deploy. It would be unfair to him, and just as unfair to his men, to remove him - definitely a morale buster!
posted by
Barb on December 28, 2006 11:24 AM
I'm not sure there's an easy answer here, but it all is to Harry's credit. Well done!
posted by
FbL on December 28, 2006 11:28 AM
let Wales go fight, but just don't have both brothers deployed in both zones at the same time.
basic risk mitigation.
posted by
MajMike on December 28, 2006 12:15 PM
Well, if I'm not mistaken, the other brother is not in any risk of that. So, Harry's danger is only that for his unit and self; the risk is to the propaganda value, in either direction, of his injury or demise.
On the other hand, as John pointed out, the Royals have gone into active combat AND put themselves at risk with their citizens for many decades. King George VI actually went out to North Africa and to the Beaches of Normandy shortly after invasion to visit the troops. Not to mention appearing in uniform about London during the Blitzkrieg.
That's without leading men. If I am not mistaken, one of his cousins in line for the throne served in Egypt in direct combat.
The risk to the throne is actually very limited since not only is there William and Harry, but the sons and daughters of the other princes and princesses.
Thus, the big risks are to the men on the ground and the propaganda value. But, if played right, even if Harry was injured or died in battle, he'd be just as valuable for propaganda to the west. And even more so as it would show that the Monarchs share the cost with their citizens, in good and bad times. It could immediately mitigate the continuing downslide of support for the war in England. Not completely, but they would get a boost out of it.
The final question is, what flag officer has the cajones to risk his future career in ordering the prince to the front?
posted by
kat-missouri on December 28, 2006 12:50 PM
Wouldn't he be Lt. Windsor?
posted by
Russ on December 28, 2006 01:05 PM
Technically, it's "Mountbatten-Windsor". However, Prince Charles used "Wales" as his surname during his active service days and his sons are following suit.
From a DOD press release: "Prince Harry's full title will be "Cornet Prince Henry of Wales, The Blues and Royals" - although everyday usage will be "Mr Wales"."
http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/DefenceNews/PeopleInDefence/PrinceHarryToJoinBluesAndRoyals.htm
Cheers
posted by
J.M. Heinrichs on December 28, 2006 01:16 PM
Prince Harry has had this attitude for a while now. He's a VERY cool young man. I'm glad to see so much of his Mom in him. The world lost a lot when Princess Diana died. Both boys are carrying out her legacy of humanitarian aid. It's so wonderful to see. Like you said John, Prince Harry will make a very fine officer.
posted by
AFSister on December 28, 2006 01:51 PM
Let him lead his men... I've no doubt that his unit will ensure his safety...
posted by
Sgt. B. on December 28, 2006 02:24 PM
I suggest asking for volunteers to serve as his unit, thus making sure every person serving under his direct command is fully willing to take the "additional" risk caused by his lineage. Most likely, the regular troops already in the unit would request to continue their tasking and very few new folks would be needed in the unit. This approach would serve to satisfy his desire to serve in a combat zone as fitting his duty and to preserve the career of the chain of command he would be part of. Those who wish to lead must first learn to serve (a quote grabbed from somewhere in English literature, maybe Roman or Greek lit.)
posted by
HH on December 28, 2006 05:38 PM
It's a complex situation but really why train and prepare otherwise? If he's treated special then he really has to be treated special and not placed with a regular unit.
I think he should be allowed to just go and do his job. If the worst happens we all know it was always possible.
posted by
Trias on December 28, 2006 06:27 PM
Actually, if George V hadn't gotten huffy over his cousin Wilhelm's troops hobnailing all over the Benelux, we'd be cheering Leftenant Harry Saxe-Coburg-Gotha for making his stand.
Dollars to donuts you're going to see the whole cav squadron go into spontaneous Bodyguard Mode when they hit Kandahar -- and woe betide *anybody* who even looks cross-eyed at the young Ell-Tee...
posted by
BillT on December 28, 2006 07:02 PM
Bill
Not quite: Battenburg-Saxe-Colburg-Gotha.
Cheers
posted by
J.M. Heinrichs on December 28, 2006 08:46 PM
I don't know how this works, but couldn't Harry also decide to voluntarily remove himself from any claim to the throne? I believe he has already stated that he wants to be career military; this would simply confirm that decision. It would likely reduce his value as a target, and probably serve as a morale boost for his unit to boot.
posted by
J-P on December 29, 2006 02:46 AM
I believe George VI was a midshipman at Jutland. Jr. turret officer, or something. Of course his genetic cull older brother was Heir. Lotta in-breeding in those old aristocratic families, that's why it was a good idea to bring in the Spencer girl, for her genotype, if not her (very) mental phenotype. Elizabeth II knows stockbreeding; her horses usually win.
I think Bil and Harry are each taller than their Dad.
posted by
Justthisguy on December 29, 2006 02:51 AM
JMH - Right you are (what *else*?). Plumb forgot about Mum's side.
posted by
BillT on December 29, 2006 06:17 AM
He should serve in whatever role any other newly commissioned officer would serve. Otherwise, what's the point of his commission in the first place?
I wish OUR 'upper crust' had the same sense of honor - when did military service cease to be expected of America's (I don't want to use the work 'elite', but that's really the only one that works)?
posted by
Threadbndr(karla) on December 29, 2006 08:32 AM
« Dismissed, Soldier!
Motivators...
Joe is back. With more.

I think the thing I like the most about this picture is... the cooler. And what it represents about US soldiery.
The thing that has kept enemies for over a century thinking we're weak and unable to fight.
We like our comforts. And we'll still rip your guts out, ascetic-boy.
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! »
a cooler and a bustle rack chock full of goodness...
it just doesn't get any better than that!
posted by
MajMike on December 28, 2006 12:17 PM
Heh. I know a pair of Chit-hook pilots who deployed to the Stanbox with their trail bikes strapped behind their seats -- and one of my jobs back in '04 was to make sure *at least* one of the Conexes accompanying my old Battalion was packed to the rafters with Charmin.
One of these days, I'll tell you guys about the Great IV Corps TP Shortage -- which transpired immediately following the POTUS' declaration that "There are no American combat troops in the Mekong Delta."
posted by
BillT on December 28, 2006 07:25 PM
The caption reminds me of something I used to tell the Hangar Tourists:
"Ideally, we'd engage tanks just outside the maximum effective range of their antiaircraft weapons -- they could probably see us, but they wouldn't be able to shoot us while we're putting missiles into them. It may not seem fair -- and it probably isn't -- but you don't pay me to fight fair. You pay me to *win*..."
posted by
BillT on December 28, 2006 08:16 PM
« Dismissed, Soldier!
Milblogger wounded.
No, a wounded milblogger isn't any more important than any other wounded warrior. But these are people we know, and through whom we get a little view into the world of the deployed soldier. No more important, just more... accessible. And just like Major Z of From My Position, this is a wounded milblogger who will probably give us another window into Walter Reed and rehab, an important aspect where these soldiers show a completely different level and type of courage and struggle to overcome and adapt.
J.R. Salzman, of Lumberjack in a Desert has been wounded by an IED.
it is hard for me to tell you all this but i was hurt by an ied here. my right arm has been amputated below the elbow, my left has four working fingers. my legs are fine so l can still logroll! i am on my way to the hospital in germany, then back to the states for more care. i am in high spirits. i am going to be ok, but i will have a long road to recovery. please remember me in your prayers, as well as those who were injured with me. i will let you know more as time passes.
This soldier was from the same unit in the Minnesota Army Guard who gave us the "Halp us Jon Carry" banner. JR wasn't one of the people in that photo, but he *did* meet the creator!

Rest assured, the Elves (Chuck and Fuzzybear Lioness) of Project Valour-IT are already on it, having been alerted by AFSis.
Standing tall and maintaining a good attitude. These kids are every bit as tough as their forebears. The Republic is well served. Well served indeed.
Update: The Elves are quick. From email: "...it should be delivered next weekend, assuming they can get ahold of Salzman's family to arrange for the meeting. "
Those of you who contribute to Project Valour-IT - thank you ever so much.
Updated update: Hello to visitors from NRO. You'll probably appreciate the post above this one, too. More importantly... Just a note regarding the Valour-IT link: the entire Soldiers' Angels website is being redone and the server transfer left a ton of stuff scrambled on the Valour-IT section of the site. They're working on it. We apologize for the mess.
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! »
Just a note regarding the Valour-IT link: the entire Soldiers' Angels website is being redone and the server transfer left a ton of stuff scrambled on the Valour-IT section of the site. They're working on it.
posted by
FbL on December 28, 2006 10:10 AM
D*mn, what a shame. Gotta love the guy's spirit, though!
posted by
Barb on December 28, 2006 10:43 AM
Linked ya. Also wrote Michelle Malkin thanking her for mentioning J.R. and fussing at her for not mentioning Valour IT in the same post.
posted by
Bill Faith on December 28, 2006 12:40 PM
Thanks for the link and the post, John. As you know, FbL's already on it and so is Chuck- esp. since he'll be at WR next weekend-ish also, when the laptop should be delivered. I'm thinking that Chuck's welcome to "the club", and Carren's support, will be a huge comfort to JR, Josie and JR's family.
I'm glad to see that you got a NRO link- you get WAY more traffic than I do, so this will really help get the story out about JR and V-IT.
As always, thoughts, prayers, and hope for a speedy recovery go out to JR. His lumberjack achievements are amazing- even his sister is a world-class logroller. I hope he's able to recover his balancing abilities so he can return to competition.
posted by
AFSister on December 28, 2006 01:46 PM
I wish him and his mates well on their road to recovery. Nice to see the help is so fast... not to mention there of course.
posted by
Trias on December 28, 2006 06:21 PM
I am so sorry to hear this.
posted by
beth on December 28, 2006 08:24 PM
Thank you for telling us about J.R. Salzman. We can never do enough to let them know we support them.
I am so grateful to Valour-IT for all they do for our troops that are wounded.
posted by
Wild Thing on December 29, 2006 12:49 AM
Do we know if JR has arrived at Walter Reed? Is there any way to direct emails or cards to him??
posted by
Kerri on December 29, 2006 12:31 PM
« Dismissed, Soldier!
December 27, 2006
H&I* Fires Dec 27, 2006
Open post for those with something to share, updated through the day. New, complete posts come in below this one. Note: If trackbacking, please acknowledge this post in your post. That's only polite. [Admittedly, I'm fibbing. Trackbacks are still broken]
You're advertising here, we should get an ad at your place...
************************
Mebbe this should have been on my Christmas list...
I love this headline: Army Calls Up Unsuspecting Reserves To Fill Ranks The headline at the website has since changed to Not Over 'Till It's Over, which is certainly accurate!
While the obligation of returning to war is part of the contract soldiers sign upon enlistment, it's jarring for those who figured they'd left behind drilling, rations, chain-of-command orders and life-threatening perils.
"It kind of knocks you off your heels a bit," Mr. Kramer said in his living room last week, with his wife Jocelyn leaning on his shoulder on their couch. "For me, I always felt after being in the military, it's not a way to raise a family."
5 years into the GWOT... I'm sure it knocks you off your heels, but it surely shouldn't be all that unexpected. That said, some of us can't get recalled to despite our best efforts... H/t, Jim C. -the Armorer
************************
Heeee! I seems that John *** The Windbag** Kerry, has gotten himself Stuk all alone in Eyerak. Hope that you had a lonely little christmas there Mr. Kerry - BOQ
***********************
The nervousness mounts. I see Ace of Spades was worried he'd gotten canceled... he didn't. He's doing fine now - TF Boggs, real milblogger just back from Iraq (vice us retired faux-milbloggers) is doing an excellent job - and he's the main guest for this show. Smash was good. I'm just gonna stutter and MSU. Those who know, know.
Hee! SGT Boggs just volunteered to be the next Churchill... soldier correspondent.
Boggs is being dismissive of the IED bombers - which is an interesting attitude. What I find interesting about the shift almost entirely to IEDs in combat is the indicator that the jihadis are less willing to face us in open combat - and are relying on external support - those Iranian IEDs - to continue the fight. That's a sign of winning.
-the Armorer
***********************
Well, that went *much* better than I expected. That said, my best line got cut off by the break...
"The Iraqis don't want Saddam back - they want the stability. But they want the stability without being fed into industrial chippers." -the Armorer
Kewl. I've done radio. My first media in a looooong time. -the Armorer
************************
Go Ethiopia! Kick Islamist Booty.
Hmmm. Wonder what's different about their approach from ours in 1993? Oh, I know. They are there to kill people, break things, and then they'll leave. Easier to do when the MSM ignores your war. -the Armorer
***********************
Hmmm... I wonder whether we are lifting a page out of previous struggles, and giving those Moon God Worshipers a taste of what we so aptly gave them Godless 4th Internationalists in Guatemala, Angola, Malaya, Burma, et alii, back in the 60's & 70's????
A SMACKDOWN BY PROXY
Somehow, me thinks that the good people sandwiched between Falls Church and Arlington, VA are performing with distinction.
Oh BTW - Many kudos to Massa John. yer on yer way to become a true Media Maven. - BOQ
Flash Traffic (extended entry) Follows... »
*A term of art from the artillery. Harassment and Interdiction Fires.
Back in the day, when you could just kill people and break things without a note from a lawyer, they were pre-planned, but to the enemy, random, fires at known gathering points, road junctions, Main Supply Routes, assembly areas, etc - to keep the bad guy nervous that the world around him might start exploding at any minute.
Not really relevant to today's operating environment, right? But, it *is*
The UAVs we fly over Afghanistan and Pakistan looking for targets of opportunity are a form of H&I fires, if you really want to parse it finely. We just have better sensors and fire control now.
I call the post that because it's random things posted by me and people I've given posting privileges to. It's also an open trackback, so if (Don Surber uses it this way a lot) someone has a post they're proud of, but it really isn't either Castle kind of stuff, or topical to a particular post, I've basically given blanket permission to use that post for that purpose. Another term of art that might be appropriate is "Free Fire Zone".
« Secure this line!
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! »
BUWAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHHA
CAN.NOT.STOP.LAUGHING.
Jon Carrey... you are *such* an ass. "You deserve it" is the first thing that came to mind- as soon as I picked myself off the floor from laughing so hard.
posted by
AFSister on December 27, 2006 01:14 PM
I wonder; has Skull and Bones ever *expelled* a member? Or would that make them look like they'd made a mistake by admitting him in the first place?
I mean, even the Masons have (I think) been known on rare occasions to do the demittal.
posted by
Justthisguy on December 27, 2006 06:15 PM
I missed it live. I was on the road. I need a link to a podcast or rebroadcast or something.
Love the John Kerry photo, it's everywhere, so many bloggers with a finely attuned sense of schadenfreude.
posted by
Maggie on December 27, 2006 08:09 PM
Hey, I know I haven't posted anything in a bit, but I stumbled across this on MSNBC of all places. This article was pretty damn cool, even though it's really short.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16356220/
posted by
MCart on December 27, 2006 09:23 PM
MCart! I thought perhaps you'd fallen in a vat of Vista or something!
posted by
John of Argghhh! on December 27, 2006 09:44 PM
Interesting to see Ethiopia in its historic role of keeper of the peace through military intervention. How unfortunate for the world that in the late 6th century they were forced to leave Yemen and Arabia because of a revolt in the province of Gondor. Let us hope that Ethiopia is able to crush this branch of Al Qaeda.
posted by
JimC on December 27, 2006 10:03 PM
Thanks, MCart, that story was great. I agree it's a surprise to find something touching and uplifting on MSLSD (as Mark Levin calls it).
posted by
Maggie on December 27, 2006 10:40 PM
You were great on Hugh Hewitt's!!! All of you!!!
Thanks so much!
Townhall.com has it streaming for those who missed it!
posted by
Flag Gazer on December 28, 2006 03:32 AM
I just read the article McCart linked.... thank you. That was a great read.
posted by
AFSister on December 28, 2006 01:58 PM
« Dismissed, Soldier!
You find the most interesting things...
...in the most unlikely places.
LTG Petraeus (CG here at Fort Leavenworth) was interviewed by the German Spiegel (Mirror) Online.
Spiegel asks...
SPIEGEL: General Petraeus, you were in charge of combat operations in Iraq, you supervised the build-up of the new Iraqi security force and now you oversee the training and education of Army officers here at Fort Leavenworth. Would you agree that you are trying to impose a sort of a cultural revolution on the United States Army?
LTG Petraeus' answer will be soup for Ry's soul:
Petraeus: There is quite a big cultural change going on. We used to say, that if you can do the "big stuff," the big combined arms, high-end, high intensity major combat operations and have a disciplined force, then you can do the so-called "little stuff," too. That turned out to be wrong.
This little snippet caught my attention:
SPIEGEL: You propagate the idea that young officers should go to graduate school. Why does a soldier need a master's degree?
Petraeus: We're talking about how to react to unforeseeable, non-standard tasks, we're talking about environments that are very different to those we're used to. You have to work in a foreign language, you have to negotiate with people who come from another religious background or who don't even share what we would call the same core values. Now here you have a setting quite similar to graduate school, which takes you out of your intellectual comfort zone -- and that really is something a young officer should experience.
You know, we in the Army, we have to admit, that we're living sometimes a sort of a grindstone cloister existence. We work very hard; indeed, we have our noses to the proverbial grindstone. And we tend to live a somewhat cloistered existence much of our lives. So we have to try to raise, as one of my colleagues once put it, our sights beyond the maximum effective range of a M-16-rifle. Graduate school and other experiences that get us out of our intellectual comfort zone help us do just that.
Heh. While I agree, and emphatically, I sent this response to the SAMS (School of Advanced Military Studies) graduate buddy of mine, Jim C. who sent me this link...
Heh. And those of us who did raise our sights above the proverbial M16 post-and-peep were rewarded exactly how...?
And Jim, who is something of a warfighting intellectual himself (at least the government pays us decent dollars to do this for them... now) responded thusly:
I believe we were shown the door.
Indeed. I agree with LTG Petraeus' responses in the piece. I only hope he (or someone like him in stature) is really working the other side - the officers who sit on the promotion boards. From our era, a not insignificant number of whom don't have combat patches. And I hope he finds a way to institutionalize it so that it lasts beyond this period of combat, though the history of the Army does not offer much hope of that.
One of the reasons I blog, beyond gun pr0n, or "the more kinetic aspects of history" as Matt describes the stuff at the Castle - to be a little ember, casting a small glow in a forgotten corner near the disused lavatory in the third sub-basement. You know the one - the one with the sign that says "Beware of the Leopard!"
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! »
General Patraeus is a breath of fresh air in many respects. I tend to think that he may be one, of a mere handful, of the senior officiers who understand that the entire military promotion system is founded on an illusion.
From the moment of your commissioning you are ranked against your peers. And since we are generally in a peacetime environment, the main criteria always seem to be, Does he know his stuff? Does he rock the boat and create problems? Does he break equipment and wear out gear? Does he know the "school solution" and ALWAYS apply it? If the answer to any of these questions indicate that you are anything but a strict conformist you are in trouble. And the system works relentlessly to weed out the nonconformist.
But time after time, in war after war, we have found that the reality of combat inevitably brings new challenges that HAVEN'T been considered in the development of the "school solution."
We have been fortunate that there usually are a few mavericks that have survived the system, even if they are aggressively non-conformist. And they often are the ones who think outside the box and find the answers to unexpected problems.
It has been my experience that the offier who has trained his men the hardest, in the most realistic manner, will generally have the most prepared unit. He will also have driven the porkchops crazy because he will have left a trail of worn out and broken equipment from hard training, he will have expended all of his ammunition allowance, and probably begged, borrowed or stolen everyone else's.
And most of the officers I've known who fit that description also have one other thing in common, they are students of our profession of arms. They read extensively and never cease learning from the past. (As Georges Santyanna said "Those who do not learn from the past are doomed to repeat it.")
Marine6 - Sends
posted by
Marine6 on December 27, 2006 12:09 PM
"Commissioned officers must adhere to the advanced educational path established by their career managers in the Officer Personnel Development section. Warrant Officers are responsible for their own career development."
The Adjutant General, New Jersey Army National Guard.
Heh. Every time I requested an advanced military school for "career development" (aka, promotion) or "complying with my educational requirements," I was accused of trying to "milk the system." Enrolling in a civilian graduate program would have gotten me fired...
posted by
BillT on December 27, 2006 04:24 PM
What Marine6 said. And Chief Bill, too. I get *so* tired of people gaming the system for social reasons instead of doing what they ought to be doing. I'd prefer an honest slacker.
Hey, takes one to know one!
posted by
Justthisguy on December 27, 2006 06:33 PM
« Dismissed, Soldier!
President Ford, Requiescat in pace.
President Ford - the first (and hopefully only) President essentially appointed to the job, never having won a nationwide election for office. And taking over in some tough circumstances, too.

Another one of those sailor Presidents who went to war...

His was a caretaker Presidency, with it's ups and downs, and is, of course, marked by two big issues.
His pardon of Nixon (which I am of mixed feelings about) and he gave us President Carter.
Of course, the plus side to that is... he set it up for Reagan.
One thing for sure, from my perspective - he was no worse a President than Carter, and was one hell of a lot better Former President.
Regardless of how you get it, the job of the Presidency of the United States has got to be soul-wearying, especially in circumstances like that, with what was going on in the US and the world at the time.
Now is the time at Castle Argghhh! when we dance: In Memoriam.
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! »
He was a good man. With all that he was faced with, and looking back now, if pardoning Richard M. Nixon was the 'worst thing' he ever did, no biggie.
RIP, Mr. President.
posted by
Cricket on December 28, 2006 04:15 PM
« Dismissed, Soldier!
A little zen for the aviators...
A bad day at the office, Bill-style.

This OH-58 Kiowa, damaged during training in Hawaii in February, was successfully landed by pilots Capt. John B. Davis and Chief Warrant Officer Steven K. Huiton despite severe damage to its main rotor.
H/t, Strategy Page.
Speaking of Bill, I found another picture of aviation-related Bill-adaptations... Back in his late-middle-age, Bill apparently had a problem with making hard landings. Here we see one experimental method of dealing with this problem...

Mebbe that's why he found himself in helos...
BTW - if anyone knows the real story (I assume it has to do with rubber shortages and experiments to reduce rubber usage) I'd love to hear it. As well as what the test pilot thought!
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! »
C-rat crackers undergoing durability testing?
posted by
Rod Thorsen on December 27, 2006 12:34 PM
No, Rod, they were having a rubber shortage then. All those horny young Rosy-the-Riveter types, ya know. Sorry about that, Chief.
No, really, it's rare to see a photo of a Mustang when it was an Apache, let alone with wooden wheels. Let me guess: The new tires were a weird size and they got the airplane finished before the tires.
posted by
Justthisguy on December 27, 2006 06:44 PM
OK, OK, OK, I got it!!
This photo illustrates the approved method of resizing c-rat crackers to fit in the little can.
posted by
Rod Thorsen on December 27, 2006 09:21 PM
SpongeBob's first job?
All right, I know, I'm having entirely too much fun with this.
posted by
Rod Thorsen on December 28, 2006 06:14 PM
Sadly, he was mustered out after he became too square to perform his duties.
posted by
Rod Thorsen on December 28, 2006 06:21 PM
OPERATION FORTITUDE...decoys across from Calais?
Gen George Patton's ficticious Army?
posted by
haji0matic on December 28, 2006 09:58 PM
I'm pretty sure that's an actual aircraft.
posted by
John of Argghhh! on December 29, 2006 08:08 AM
Seriously now. This ac is unarmed, the cannon protruded several feed from the fairings. Both folks in the photo appear to be civilian.
If I had an assembly line going, would I shut it down while waiting for the boxcar of tires to show up?
I think this was just a way to get mostly completed ac from blocking the assembly line while awaiting parts.
posted by
Rod Thorsen on December 29, 2006 02:01 PM
Rod - that's the best explanation I've seen yet.
posted by
John of Argghhh! on December 29, 2006 02:48 PM
justthisguy had it, I was just going with it
posted by
Rod Thorsen on December 29, 2006 04:34 PM
« Dismissed, Soldier!
December 26, 2006
H&I* Fires Dec 26, 2006
Open post for those with something to share, updated through the day. New, complete posts come in below this one. Note: If trackbacking, please acknowledge this post in your post. That's only polite. [Admittedly, I'm fibbing. Trackbacks are still broken]
You're advertising here, we should get an ad at your place...
************************
Christmas at Family Central was pretty good. We hope yours, wherever you were, was as well. We're on the road, headed back to the Castle. Y'all behave. -the Armorer
***********************
If you need something to kick you out of your post-Christmas torpor, Op-for has the cure. Whew!
And apparently he hasn't had the chance to post this yet, but word is that John will be on the Hugh Hewitt radio show Wednesday (27 Dec) at around 4:20 p.m. Pacific Time. The entire show, which airs from 3:00 to 6:00 Pacific (that's 1500-1800 for you military types), will be about milblogs. You can listen live online here. - FbL
************************
Mebbe I wasn't gonna advertise to have the whole world drop in and listen to me embarrass myself... just sayin'. I mean, I'm the filler in this crowd, what with Matt, Austin Bay, Froggy, TF Boggs, and mebbe Wretchard. I might be the biggest guy at that table, but I'm the smallest voice. -the Armorer
************************
Rita, one of my blogneighbors/blogfriends', son made it home for Christmas from the Sandbox.
To say the least his 6 year old son, who Rita helps watch, was elated at the return of his father for Christmas.
It took him a second to see and then it was DADDY!!!! IT'S MY DADDY!!!!! And off across the terminal he sprinted, as hard as he could run, screaming DADDY DADDY DADDY DADDY!!!!!!! He leaped into my son's arms & hugged him as tightly as an almost-six yr. old possibly could, still yelling DADDY DADDY at the top of his lungs.
Read the whole thing here.
Radio & Blog Personality Don Elkins of Arkansas Tonight is heading East to assume a job behind a anchor desk in that locale instead of here. We'll miss ya Don.
H/t: tipthefiveforty
-BloodSpite
Flash Traffic (extended entry) Follows... »
*A term of art from the artillery. Harassment and Interdiction Fires.
Back in the day, when you could just kill people and break things without a note from a lawyer, they were pre-planned, but to the enemy, random, fires at known gathering points, road junctions, Main Supply Routes, assembly areas, etc - to keep the bad guy nervous that the world around him might start exploding at any minute.
Not really relevant to today's operating environment, right? But, it *is*
The UAVs we fly over Afghanistan and Pakistan looking for targets of opportunity are a form of H&I fires, if you really want to parse it finely. We just have better sensors and fire control now.
I call the post that because it's random things posted by me and people I've given posting privileges to. It's also an open trackback, so if (Don Surber uses it this way a lot) someone has a post they're proud of, but it really isn't either Castle kind of stuff, or topical to a particular post, I've basically given blanket permission to use that post for that purpose. Another term of art that might be appropriate is "Free Fire Zone".
« Secure this line!
Reporting As Ordered, Sir! »
You got to love these guys, big time, for just being there...but an exposed and apparently disorganized gun position and no f***ing helments... a career ender for a USA Battery Commander, could this possably be SOP for our Canadian brothers? Best
posted by
Snake Eater on December 26, 2006 02:24 PM
Hmmm - a comment that seems to have wandered from its home below ;-)
Merry Christmas to all Denizens! Hope no one ate so much that they can't sit at the computer comfortabley ... *grin* Since my internet connection at home is still out, I'm using the one at the office for a while. Cheers, all!
posted by
Barb on December 26, 2006 04:16 PM
I'm at a wedding tomorrow afternoon, otherwise I'd listen in just to hear The Donovan rumbling over the public airwaves. Best of luck with the live gig, John.
posted by
Damian on December 26, 2006 09:39 PM
Mebbe I wasn't gonna advertise to have the whole world drop in and listen to me embarrass myself...
Oops.
*off to join Ry in the castle dungeon*
posted by
FbL on December 26, 2006 10:20 PM
And me thinks someone is taken back by just plain old fashion modesty :)
If you were just filler, John, with all due respect, a lot of folks wouldn't be here :)
'Sides we like you 'cuz you make damn good sense
Something that lately seems to have been lacking in other avenue's......like sanity at my place lately...
Congratz either way!
posted by
BloodSpite on December 27, 2006 10:09 AM
« Dismissed, Soldier!