previous post next post  

A Google Search

A certain search term has been hijacked by our good friends in the left.

Go to Google and look at the first item that comes-up when you search the following serch inquire: Santorum.

How classy </sarcasm>

Boq

11 Comments

Wicked.

 
Looks like a Google bomb.  Actually my first item is a news feed.
 
Welcome to nearly 20 years ago?

They got mad at him sometime in the mid 90s, if I recall, and coined that.

This is, in any case, <I>not a recent thing</i>, and the only connection to his current semi-plausiblity as a candidate is that it's getting <I>attention</i>.
 
1. It was 2003.
2. "Savage told Mother Jones in 2010, "If Rick Santorum wants to make a $5 million donation to [the gay marriage group] Freedom to Marry, I will take it down. Interest starts accruing now."
3. It's a case of a twig trying to be a big swinging stick. Savage wants to be revered like Congressman John Lewis.

Cheers
 
 This does not exist without the complicity of Google.
 
 The left has become bestial. And Google, inspite of its motto, is evil. This country is royally screwed.
 
Google's algorithm ranks search results based upon number of links with the term to results.  In other words, if you search for any particular term, you get the result that has the most links to it that the Google spiders found.  Swaying those results artificially is called "Google bombing".  You create a massive number of webpages that link to the desired result, and let Google's spiders crawl the site.  You can accumulate rankings quite rapidly.  It's not malice on Google's part.  No "complicity" is required, just a knowledge of how things work.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_bomb

To see how this works in practice, take a look at the top result for "exploding lasagna".  I doubt SKK colluded with Google to get that as the top result.
   
Well, it is possible to have what's called "same-sex-attraction" and still behave like a gentleman or lady, and not scare the horses, etc.  Some people, obviously lacking in manners, seem to fail, there. 
 
John, I was going to include that, but then I remembered that you kept referring to it in order to raise your ranking, you googlebomber!  ;)