previous post next post  

'Bout them captions...

It's been a while since I watched an A10 run-in on target, but to me this looks more like the guy dropped a bomb vice launched a Maverick - but I'll let you AF guys (oh, like, mebbe, Dusty, the A10 pilot) rule on the caption. Regardless, I like the pic...
a-10-training-bomb-range-10.jpg

An A-10 Thunderbolt II from the U.S. Air Force Weapons School at Nellis Air Force Base, Nev., drops a AGM-65 Maverick during a close-air support training mission Sept. 23, 2011, over the Nevada Test and Training Range. U.S. Air Force Weapons School students participate in many combat training missions over the NTTR during the six-month, graduate-level instructor course. (U.S. Air Force photo/Senior Airman Brett Clashman)

6 Comments

Does like like a GP bomb, but the AGM-65 does have a good sized shaped warhead.  If the target was an armored vehicle, this could be correct.  The photo appears to show that the blast smoke is more uprange (past the target) than downrange (before the target) and this is indicative of a missile launch.

BTW:  You do NOT drop an AGM-65 Maverick, you launch (fire) one..

The AGM-65D I fired in 1988 had a blast that did look like a Mk-82 500 pound GP bomb.
 
 I'd transfer all the A-10s to the Army, where they belong.

That otter get Dusty stirred up.
 
Agree, close air support SHOULD be controlled by the Army.  Period!
 
I agree, QM, but we can't do that. The BUFF and Bone drivers have all the smart-bomb assignments tied up, so there's fewer slots for flesh'n'blood aviators.  Gotta let them jocks blow something up once in a while. :)


 
 "Gotta let them jocks blow something up …"
Not a problem; buy them some near-beer, wait ten minutes, and they'll start blowing up their stories.

Cheers
 
It's difficult to say what that was but I'm inclined to believe it was a Maverick. The blast isn't that large and it's relatively focused (note the mushroom-like cloud--often the result of a shaped charge detonating with extreme force in a confined area). AGM-65s don't make a huge explosion, unless you happen to be on the receiving end; normally all you see is a bright, momentary flash and then there's very little left of whatever it's hit.

The picture angle is a little confusing. I'm thinking the guy in the picture, if he was in fact the shooter, flew near the impact point to inspect the damage. Otherwise, since the whole point of a forward-firing weapon is to not overfly the target but instead to pummle the heathen from afar, you'd probably never see him. But, as this is a WS sortie, methinks all four of the guys (normally live fires involve 4-ships for a number of reasons) probably ended up "touring" the target area for their own education.

I do remember one 4-ship whose IP launched an older AGM-65 followed by the most impressive g-bias maneuver EVAH (straight up). G-bias is a programmed pitch-up a few microseconds after launch to extend the range of the missile...the motor only burns for a second or two, after which it glides to the target. Since the inital thrust (first half-second) is 10,000 lbs and the missile only weighs 500 lbs or so, the acceleration rate is pretty impressive. Granted, it's not an AIM-9 (that looks like a bottle rocket when it gets going), but it's still a good boost. Which made the guy's missile disappear into the stratosphere almost instantly.

Now what?

Well, to quote King Arthur: "Run away! Run AWAAAAY!" Which everyone did...a horizontal bomb burst with everyone picking a cardinal direction. An eternity later, one guy (probably the IP) spotted a little boomlet a few miles away on the desert floor and the relief was palpable. Of course, Weapons School guys being Weapons School guys, they probably spent the post-mission brief calculating the maximum altitude the missile reached before returning to earth, impact angle, penetration depth, etc., etc.