previous post next post  

Really? REALLY?

Gotta love the spin here.  "Gosh!  We're so excited, we've pushed down the average time it takes to hire someone from 155 days to 116!  Dang, we're super-good!"

Heh.  I'd like to know the median time it take to hire someone, as well as the metrics used to reach these numbers.   Am I wrong, or is the government the only entity that can even *contemplate* timelines like this, much less tout 116 days as an *accomplishment*?

Do we have someone who is knowledgeable about this who can weigh in?

DOD Makes Progress in Civilian Hiring Reform
By Donna Miles
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, May 18, 2011 - Until very recently, applying for a civilian job at the Defense Department was an exercise in endurance and patience. Applicants had to navigate through a byzantine federal hiring process and amass thick application packets, then often waited as long as a year for any word on their applications.

Pasquale "Pat" M. Tamburrino Jr., deputy assistant secretary of defense for civilian personnel policy, said the practice left defense offices short of critical skills for extended periods and discouraged the best candidates from even considering federal service.

"If you are going to be in the marketplace, competing for the best and brightest – which is what we want – we want to be the employer of choice," he said. "And if you make it hard to apply, you are going to lose in the marketplace."

Committed to attracting the best job candidates, the Defense Department is making good on President Barack Obama's mandate last year to improve the federal hiring process.

DOD launched its own hiring reform initiative two years ago, and it's revolutionizing the way the department processes about 250,000 hiring actions a year, Tamburrino said.

The typical timeframe for hiring new employees already has been cut from an average of 155 days to 116. "We're pretty happy with that, but we are not stopping there," Tamburrino said. His goal is to reduce that to the administration's goal of about 80 days.

The broad, 10-step DOD hiring reform initiative covers the full spectrum of the hiring process to make it not only faster, but also simpler, less bureaucratic and more transparent, he explained. It makes applying for a DOD job more in line with what the private sector offers, he added, and ensures hiring managers have the tools they need to advertise and fill vacancies.

It builds a closer partnership between hiring managers and human resources personnel to expedite the hiring process and make it a better experience for everyone involved, Tamburrino said.

For applicants, gone is the burdensome Standard Form 171, the official federal resume that could run 15 to 20 pages. Also gone is the requirement that job-seekers write essays proving they have the proper knowledge, skills and abilities – called KSAs – for the job.

Applications have gone electronic, filed through the Office of Personnel Management's governmentwide "USAJobs" portal. And once applicants enter their profile into the system, detailing their education, work history and skills, that information propagates all of their other job applications.

After they press "send," applicants are no longer left wondering if their application has gone into a "black hole," Tamburrino said. "People are getting feedback when they submit their application," he said. "They are getting a response: 'Your application is in the queue. It has been received by the [human resources] office. It is being processed.'"

Any questions that need to be cleared up are addressed early on to ensure they don't slow down the process.

DOD's hiring reform initiative doesn't stop with the application process. Hiring managers are adopting new, streamlined methods to advertise their positions and interview the best-qualified candidates.

The days of "convoluted vacancy announcements that were almost unique to every individual job we advertised" have fallen by the wayside, Tamburrino said. Now, rather than custom-writing every vacancy announcement, hiring managers are encouraged to use standardized templates that cover basic job functions at the designated occupational series and grade level. Minor edits to those templates ensure they properly describe the particular job being filled.

"We think that makes it go a lot faster," Tamburrino said. "We are teaching managers how to do structured interviews and how to write better job opportunity announcements."

Much of that instruction is provided through the new online Hiring Managers Toolkit, which DOD started rolling out about eight months ago and continues to refine. The toolkit offers guides, tip sheets and checklists to help hiring managers better partner with their human resources servicing centers, Tamburrino said.

The toolkit has become the gold standard among federal agencies, receiving raves from OPM and others wanting to adopt it as well.

"We routinely get feedback on that toolkit, that it is one of the most forward-leaning, innovative tools in the federal government," Tamburrino said. "We are unaware of any other executive agency that has a toolkit with as many tools in it and as many information pieces in it to help hiring managers. ... We think we have a lock on the market."

Another key to DOD's hiring reform initiative are the human resources professionals themselves.

"You are responsible for providing the very best in customer service," Tamburrino tells his HR professionals. "If an organization comes to you seeking advice, you must give clear, plain-language advice on how to address their challenge."

As subject-matter experts who understand the nuances of sometimes daunting federal hiring regulations and know what it takes to attract and recruit good talent, HR professionals are valuable partners in helping hiring managers navigate the hiring process, he said.

As DOD starts realizing the benefit of its hiring reform initiative, Tamburrino said, he's seeing a lot of enthusiasm about its possibilities.

Feedback, garnered through surveys, gives job applicants and hiring managers alike an opportunity to weigh in on the improvements. Tamburrino said it also helps to uncover shortcomings in an effort to further refine the process.

Regardless of how much the process improves, Tamburrino said he never expects to be able to declare "mission accomplished."

"I don't think this is ever going to be over," he said. "This is continuous process improvement, and I don't think we are ever going to be satisfied with where we are." In the meantime, Tamburrino said, he's satisfied with the direction the process is taking DOD's hiring process.

"It's timeliness and quality, balanced," he said. "It's success for the applicant and success for the manager, balanced."

These initiatives have eliminated barriers to attracting the broadest, most talented workforce for the department's work in caring for military members and their families, conducting research, running depots and shipyards, and even developing the next-generation weapons systems, Tamburrino said.

"Where else are you going to do that?" he asked. "We think we are a great place to work, and we give people at every level of experience a great opportunity to do really unique stuff. So we want people to gravitate to us, and we want an ability to really pick out the crown jewels that exist out there in the workforce and say, 'Come work with us.'"

Ultimately, Tamburrino said, he'd like to see the hiring reform initiative expand its focus to "employment reform." He describes that as an effort to improve the way the Defense Department manages the careers of the civilian employees it recruits.

"To me, it is a whole lifecycle event," he said. "Getting you in is just one step."
 

16 Comments

Note that the target is *80 days*...
Jules Verne went around the world in that time- in the 19th Century.
 
"...and we want an ability to really pick out the crown jewels that exist out there in the workforce and say, 'Come work with us.'"

Unless you're over fifty -- the fed'rul gummint is the single biggest practitioner of age discrimination in the country. They're not allowed to ask you your date of birth, but they *do* ask "What year did you graduate high school?"

I once submitted a 'lectronic app for a position requiring a minimum of five years' experience in a certain field -- I had ten. When I applied, I answered honestly that I graduated high school in 1964, and 48 hours later, I received a reply that I "didn't meet the specified minimum experience" requirement. Just on a hunch, I immediately resubmitted for the same position, changing only my high school graduation date -- to 1980. I received an e-mail that afternoon, stating that my application had passed review and asking if I was still interested in the job.

Both e-mails were from the same selecting official. Go figure.
 
For BillT:
Not all government jobs are age-discriminatory like that.  However, they ALL have to meet their quotas of Preferred Species or the SES responsible is screwed.
 
Who cares how long it takes to hire DOD civilians.

What is really important is how fast the total number of federal (not just DOD) civilian employees can be laid off and their positions eliminated.

Department of Education and Department of Energy need to be taken down to a zero manpower authorization and bodies filling any billets.  Finishing by next week might help make a dent in our excess spending problem.
 
Someone needs to tie down Mr. Tamburrino and his management chain and give them an hour long Powerpoint presentation about how in the 21st century Real World, people can get hired in a WEEK.  If I have to wait more than a month I assume either the answer is "no" or the company has gone out of business. 116 weeks is completely bogus.  Of course, if you only want to hire the kind of people who *can't* get hired elsewhere in a week, well, that explains a lot about the Gubmint.
 
 JOhn (NTA), that's like the joke about "what is 1,000 lawyers at teh bottom of the Atlantic?" The proper answer is "a good start." Ed doesn't educate anyone and is a major impediment. Energy hasn't produce one erg of energy, although at first the ERDA did some interesting research, then it was folded into teh new Dept of Energy, with Lawyers taking over, then nothing more happened, except like Ed it impded anything that might be useful.

There are other parts of the Bureaucracy that needs to go, and some of it is the morons handling acquisition for the Military, which has been abysmal for the last 30 years.
 
Homeland Security/ ATF.
Product delivery equals Dept. of Energy.
 
Not all government jobs are age-discriminatory like that.

Not all, just the civil service ones. Although one organization actually tried to recruit me with a cold call and offered to waive five years off their mandatory retirement age -- they kinda hiccupped when I told them it'd haveta be more like fifteen just to get me on board for a day...

 
I can understand some time for background checks but in this day and age it shouldn't take more than a couple of weeks - at the very most. But then the gubmint works in mysterious ways.
 
DoE was established by Jimmeh Cottuh to find ways to reduce our dependence on imported oil. However, he didn't give them the mandate or the power to actually *do* anything in that area except produce reports and recommendations. For all practical purposes, it's nothing but an echo chamber for whoever's occupying the overstuffed chair in the EPA.
 
I can understand some time for background checks but in this day and age it shouldn't take more than a couple of weeks...

Heh. My 1998 clearance renewal -- with no changes since the '88 renewal -- was still in conditional status when I deployed to Boz in 2001. Word through the rumor mill in 2009 was that they were so backlogged that they suspended background investigations on Obie's nominees because

1. the nominees would probably be gone by the time the investigations were complete and

2. about half the nominees had such a shady background, they'd never pass the check in the first place.
 
For BillT:
I seem to recall hearing item 2 about Slick's nominees as well.  Didn't hear that about Shrub's but I'm sure it was just because the Media didn't want to discredit them...

For bcr:
I suspect that 116 days includes the ENTIRE process from request by supervison, through job description development, approval by appropriate management level, advertisement in appropriate venues, review and rating of applications received, interview, and selection.  You should realize that Chicago can do it far more quickly.  Is that what you REALLY want?  Because that is how it used to be...
 
Age discrimination in the DOD? Of course there is! In 1982, when I was 39 and on TAD, I applied for a very prestigious flying job in the USAF, back seater (RSO) in the SR-71. I had done my homework, and had a three-star endorsement (CC, 15th Air Force, parent command of the 1st Strat Recon). I had also done my physical work, running 30 miles a week for 6 months, being able to do 60 REAL sit-ups (not just crunches) per minute, pushups by the 50s. I had a standing heart rate of 56 and a standing blood presure of 108/70. At 5'10" I weighed 156#. No hint of the diabetes to come. I took and passed the mandatory Astronaut physical exam, but the USAF refused to waive the age limitation of 34, dispite the fact that most RSOs in the 1st Strat Recon Wing were well over 40.

Don't tell me that ageism doesn't exist in the DOD. It ALWAYS has, and ALWAYS will.

BTW, just try working past 55 as a Deputy Sheriff around these parts, and you'll find out what ageism is, also.
 
Mark touches on one of my questions - what's metric measuring?
 
 The military is definitely unfair. They refuse to accept this arthritic 56 yo, highly motivated man into flight school. So unfair. makes me wanna defect to the Soviets.
 
They're not talking about active duty in re ageism.  All this blather, and not a single mention of rampant nepotism/cronyism that has made at least the Navy Civilian side an absolute joke.  It is a hotbed of incompetent careerists, many of whom are absolutely unpatriotic.