previous post next post  

Flex and adapt.

It may not actually be worth a damn, since I doubt they have any idea how to usefully aim it other than the traditional third world "spray and pray" method, but it is an excellent example of adaptation.



In this case, adapting an aircraft rocket pod to a *very* field-expedient ground-mount.

H/t Kevin.

10 Comments

They'll get the azimuth about right, but it'll be a tad difficult adjusting for range.

Unless they have a

*squinting at pic and mentally calculating firing angle*

ten-klick piece of string and an FO who's a world-class sprinter...
 
If you could get a bunch of them together...you've got yourself a short-range hill billy Katyusha battery.  Quantity having that certain quality all it's own.

Wonder how far those things can fly with the right launch angle?
 
Just how do you think the Gazans get THEIR accuracy when lobbing rockets into Israel?  Do you REALLY think they care where the rockets land?

Of course, that WAS pretty much the idea behind Rolling Thunder.  Close is good enough...
 
 I suspect the warrenty on that pickmeup is toast !
 
The platform actually looked surprisingly stable.  I didn't see anyone pull out a GFT/GST --- just sayin'.

ML
 
Withan Arclight mission, the BUFFs droped so much that the dispersion took care of the accuracy part to a great extent.
 
Wonder how far those things can fly with the right launch angle?

Depends on propellant age and condition. I've seen references varying from 5km to 10km. I know for sure that the ones the dirtbags used to drop on us were fired from considerably closer (about 3km), but they were always high-angle launches.

 
As I said, close is good enough...

And the same for missions with the Big Boys' toys!
 
Methinks that riggin' may have a backblast problem. Do they lower the tailgate
before firing, or does it go away by itself? If it stays, how much reflected blast
makes life uncomfortable in the cab?
 
1.  warfare.ru/

2.  warfare.ru/

Cheers