previous post next post  

Hmmmm.

Ben Franklin on what Congresspersons should be...
"They are of the people, and return again to mix with the people, having no more durable preeminence than the different grains of sand in an hourglass. Such an assembly cannot easily become dangerous to liberty. They are the servants of the people, sent together to do the people's business, and promote the public welfare; their powers must be sufficient, or their duties cannot be performed. They have no profitable appointments, but a mere payment of daily wages, such as are scarcely equivalent to their expences; so that, having no chance for great places, and enormous salaries or pensions, as in some countries, there is no triguing or bribing for elections." --Benjamin Franklin, letter to George Whatley, 1785
 

We certainly let *that* slip away...

10 Comments

Yep... The way it should be.

I'd forgotten that reference, so thanks.

Aside: I've said we should be picking them from the jury pool - letting them live exactly as our military does while in DC, etc. But then I believe in unicorns and the like...
 
I don't know, but I get this sense in reading from the "Wisdom of The Castle of Argghhh!", that you just *might be* just little bit, pithed-off. To be accurate, I mean like "flaming-Napalm". *Please*, don't forget, there is plenty of blame to go around, for a long time, on all sides. 

You don't need me to say it, you already know. This is just for historical context. POTUS is doing nothing, but following his predecessors' patterns of actions.
 
 
Nah, Grumpy, I'm fine.  I'm *always* this snarky about people who think my money is their money.
 
POTUS doesn't create the dumb legislation that reaches into our pockets to take our money.  Only Congress Critters can create it.  Sadly, the phrase "...They have no profitable appointments ..." is no longer true.  And they can cause much more trouble than ole Ben may have imagined, smart though he was.
 
Power always finds a way to give itself gold stars and gold bars.

Your congress needs fixing even more than the President.


 
John, I know you're fine, in this place, snarkiness is an absolute necessity. You just don't like getting your front pockets picked, especially when they are empty. One request, "Please tell me one Administration/ Congress who would *not* cause you to become snarky?" When they are spending money they don't have, they are trying to pick your pockets.  
 
I just returned last PM from a 5 day trip to our national seat of government.  Let me tell you, times are tough in DC.........So tough in fact, that staffers are being forced to wear their worn out holey blue jeans to work for meetings with constituents while their boss is back home!

For the first time in my life, *I* was the one overdressed.........
 
 Actually, it slipped away PDQ. By the time Daniel Webster was in congress, he was expecting certainn emoluments to be delivered to him with regularlity from other than the FedGov. With Andy Jackson, the elections he was involved with were questionable. Dem shenanigans are far from new.
 

"When you see that trading is done, not by consent, but by compulsion – when you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing – when you see that money is flowing to those who deal, not in goods, but in favors – when you see that men get richer by graft and by pull than by work, and your laws don’t protect you against them, but protect them against you – when you see corruption being rewarded and honesty becoming a self-sacrifice – you may know that your society is doomed." Ayn Rand



 
Ben was a scientist and a philosopher.  Except for Washington, the guys who have their pictures on the other banknotes were a bunch of devious politicians. Yes, even you, Tom Jefferson! (Aspies can be cheaters, too!)