previous post next post  

Columbus Day +3, Finishing the Whatziss!

octoberwhatzissanswer.jpg 

IBM got it right yesterday, with Terrapod jumping on that bandwagon, and then Heinrichs doing his signature web-search (what, no video?) The Whatziss is an Italian howitzer captured at Caporetto.  In this case, the 305mm howitzer on the "De Stefano" mount, better seen in the picture below. The "headless officer" Heinrichs pointed out is an Austrian soldier - not Allied, as several of you posited.  And while IBM was correct, I'm still knocking off 5 points for his "butt-covering" answer of the Brit guns.  Not.even.    Italian 305mm howitzer in a De Stefano mount.
That maddening "ladder to nowhere" went to the gunner's platform that is missing on the exemplar gun in the Whatziss.  The De Stefano mount was intended to both handle recoil and facilitate transportation - so the sources say.  My personal take is the system has more to do with ease of assembly and transportation - recoil reduction is a side benefit at best.  In addition to the recuperator on the gun, the entire mount could move up the inclined ramp - if it were assembled that way.  There were several variations of the De Stefano mounts - some where several different parts of the entire gun system recoiled on their own ramps.

As the first picture indicates, with Og's "Lego waffle" mud-feet, the gun could be moved limited distances on the wheels, but it was disassembled and moved in sections by truck and trailer or train for long moves.  The De Stefano system was used with several different guns -  more data, and pictures of what I'm talking about can be found here, at Valka.cz.

19 Comments

Geez - had that thing still been around at my commissioning, I believe I would have stayed in the Infantry.  That is one butt ugly cannon!!!

ML
 
Very cool. One of the best WHatsis ever!
 
Unacceptable...the Italians never made anything so ugly. It has no racing stripe, Itsa no have no leather interior, itsa no have 6 forward speeds and itsa not Red.
 
That top photo looks like a Trojan Anteater.

 
You mean.... this is NOT an out-take from a Monty Python film?
 
You mean, this is NOT an out-take from a Monty Python film?
 
I did not do that on purpose...
 
Susan - nope, nope, nope.
 
Not Monty Python, more like Austin Powers.
*snort*
0>;~}
 
You want to see an Italian war machine that's even uglier?  How about the monitor Faa di Bruno?

http://www.cityofart.net/bship/rn_faadibruno.html

The amazing thing is that she was actually "designed," as opposed to having been cobbled together by a bunch of drunk college students over a weekend.  Had she been steam powered rather than using a handy pair of spare internal combustion engines she'd qualify as genuine steampunk.
 
You want to see an Italian war machine that's even uglier? How about the monitor Faa di Bruno?

http://www.cityofart.net/bship/rn_faadibruno.html

The amazing thing is that she was actually "designed," as opposed to having been cobbled together by a bunch of drunk college students over a weekend. Had she been steam powered rather than using a handy pair of spare internal combustion engines she'd qualify as genuine steampunk.
 
Damn it.  Well, all I have to say is, Faa di Bruno is TWICE as ugly as the Aardvark Gun.  Hence the double post.
 
No, no, no!  NO WAY!  Not even Fiat would design something so ugly!  It must have been done by a British or French infiltrator!
 
The amazing thing is that she was actually "designed," as opposed to having been cobbled together by a bunch of drunk college students over a weekend.
 

is there a difference?
 
Steve - I kinda liked the Faa di Bruno.  But hey, it *is* just self-propelled artillery, right?
 
Ha - at least I was right about the Italian part!
 
The Faa di Bruno actually served and served reasonably well?  I'm shocked the damn thing didn't sink under the first tender wave.  Does this mean ugly is better?
 
Thanks fro reminding me about cityofart, Steve. I've wasted much time there gazing at the weird pre-dreadnaughts.  The most giggleous are, of course, the Russian circular battleships.
 
Argent, both of Faa di Bruno's predecessors did sink.  And Faa di Bruno herself ran aground, being so damned unmaneuverable.

The RN monitors, while just as much of a slap dash jury rig, performed much better.  One of the WWI ships, HMS Terror, is commemorated by the Terror Club in Singapore, where she served between the wars as guardship.