previous post next post  

The President's Speech

It wasn't awful, but it was weak tea, and disingenuous - as all speeches like this tend to be.

"But this milestone should serve as a reminder to all Americans that the future is ours to shape if we move forward with confidence and commitment. It should also serve as a message to the world that the United States of America intends to sustain and strengthen our leadership in this young century."

Heh. If I'm going to hear this from a Democrat sitting in the Oval Office, I much prefer the JFK version:

"Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, in order to assure the survival and the success of liberty….”

Then there's this rich vein of pandering:

"These are the rough waters encountered during the course of one of America’s longest wars. Yet there has been one constant amidst those shifting tides. At every turn, America’s men and women in uniform have served with courage and resolve. As Commander-in-Chief, I am proud of their service. Like all Americans, I am awed by their sacrifice, and by the sacrifices of their families"

What's missing from that of course, is any admission that as a Senator and candidate for President, to paraphrase, "I thought your sacrifices to be in vain, a waste of blood and treasure, and that you were flailing and failing, and threatened to defund you. Tonight - I would like to say that you and your leaders proved me wrong."

Yeah, right. This is what we got instead:

"The Americans who have served in Iraq completed every mission they were given. They defeated a regime that had terrorized its people. Together with Iraqis and coalition partners who made huge sacrifices of their own, our troops fought block by block to help Iraq seize the chance for a better future. They shifted tactics to protect the Iraqi people; trained Iraqi Security Forces; and took out terrorist leaders. Because of our troops and civilians –and because of the resilience of the Iraqi people – Iraq has the opportunity to embrace a new destiny, even though many challenges remain."

Despite Senator Obama.

Now he gets to take credit for that which he called a failure in the making. Truly, success has many fathers, and failure is an orphan. But he does get to take credit, and should. Even if he can't bring himself to say so - he got those briefings only Presidents get, and changed his mind. Too bad he can't bring himself to give his predecessor any credit on the issue at all. Because it was his predecessor who facilitated the changes Mr. Obama talks about in the paragraph above.

Then there’s this, a bit near and dear to my heart, third generation veteran that I am:

"Part of that responsibility is making sure that we honor our commitments to those who have served our country with such valor. As long as I am President, we will maintain the finest fighting force that the world has ever known, and do whatever it takes to serve our veterans as well as they have served us. This is a sacred trust. …Because part of ending a war responsibly is standing by those who have fought it."

I will grant the President this - there is a long way to go in keeping these promises, and there is much work for Secretary Shinseki and his successors to do to make the VA "all that it can be" - but the trend is the most positive in this direction under any of the administrations my grandfather, my father and I served under - which would run from President Wilson through President Bush. The test will come after Afghanistan slips from the front pages, and the flag-drapped boxes quit coming home, and the rattle of musketry and cannon fade - that is when the Republic has a tendency to renege on promises made to young folk bearing arms in the nation's defense.

14 Comments

Just for a moment imagine the possible impact and difference it could make if a tour of duty, in any branch of our Military, become a requirement to be President.  This person automatically becomes the most powerful man/woman in the World.  Should they not have some idea/perspective as to what it takes and what is expected by those he commands as Comander and Chief?

Semper Fi
 
Just for a moment imagine the possible impact and difference it could make if a tour of duty in any branch of our Military ever be a requirement to become President.  This person automatically becomes the most powerful man/woman in the World.  Should they not have some idea/perspective as to what it takes and what is expected by those he commands as Comander in Chief.


Semper Fi
 
oo, a *triple* echo!  9.8 from the Russian Judge!

(and the speech gets 3 out of 5 Disdainful Putin Sneers.  I've seen better writing on Craigslist)
 
the best speech is from Churchill and just be pleased that you aren't in the position now that he was then.
 
Greetings:

As a printer by trade, I'm very much a "visual" person.  Several times, during our President's speech last evening, I thought I saw the same look I used to have on my face during my periodic trips to the principal's office at St. Margaret Mary's Elementary School back in the Bronx.  As much as lying can delay an outcome, it tends to get exponentially more difficult with the passage of time.  
 
It's not just that Obama and other Dem leaders were wrong and opposed the Surge.

They threw up every obstacle they could to impede its implementation and success, and they did everything they could to tarnish the credibility and reputations of honorable public servants like GEN Petraeus and others.

I don't expect any POTUS to be perfect.  They're human and they're gonna get some things wrong. But I do expect leaders to acknowledge their errors and acknowledge those who were right.

Considering all the bashing Obama's done, I would have declined to accept Obama's call if I'd been Bush.

I know. I'm petty.  Thank God Bush wasn't ...... in so many ways.
 
As I read this, I'm reminded of something a very wise man wrote, not so long ago. The discussion compared the differences between a soldier and warrior. Both men fight, so what's the difference?

@LarryC, As I read your comment, in a strange way, this wise old man answers your question. To paraphrase it, "What do our Troops really expect from the Commander-in-Chief?" The wise old man wrote, paraphrasing, 'A Soldier is disciplined and a warrior is not.' "Grumpy, is the Military the only way to gain this discipline?" My reply, "If you learn discipline or rebellion, it permeates  your whole life. A soldier takes an oath of loyalty to US Constitution, to honor and obey it, not try to find ways to circumvent it.   There are other places to learn discipline.  If you haven't learned to obey, you're not fit to command! This is *the* answer."

@11B40, I haven't seen a "President, or even a Presidential candidate", that I respected, as a person, for decades. History is that nasty, unforgiving teacher. The more you know, the madder you get.

 
You cannot believe a word this man says. 

Sadly, I believe he does not actually give a darn about the American soldiers or their families, and views them as a wasteful expense undercutting his grand socialist strategy.

He has no taste for victory, nor American exceptionalism, nor even the very concepts of freedom and liberty.

It would have been "better to remain silent and merely thought to be a fool than to open [The] one's mount and remove all doubt."

Our troops deserve better leadership, deserve greater (and sincere) thanks for their services, our nation deserves clear vision for our future, and our enemies need clear warning that we will not tolerate attacks on freedom.  We got none of that, and probably will not until January 20, 2013.  If we are not crumbled into bankrupcty and socialist servitude to the state by then.

Next time, the networks should run reruns of any show at all.  Beavis and Butthead would provide a reasonable facsimile of the wisdom available from Obama and Biden.
   
As much as lying can delay an outcome, it tends to get exponentially more difficult with the passage of time.

Only a couple of more days before the "Summer of Recovery" kicks in...
 
He speaks so much and does so little.  His speeches have a very academic flow to them.  It is as though they are designed to impress some phantom marker, rather than rouse the public or call to action.
 
Unfortunately, the "Summer of Recovery" will lead into a "Winter of Discontent".
 
Its funny you mention previous speeches. I said something similar.

I can not stand the fact people label him in Orator. To me he isn't a orator at all, he's reading a flippin speech. Theres no oration there. He didn't memorize the speech or work it off the cuff.

Just infuriating
 
I can not stand the fact people label him in Orator.

People have been doing that despite the proof to the contrary in every speech he gives.

He reads. He can't extemporize without lapsing into deer-in-the-headlights stuttering. His malaprops are worse than Bush's were.

I've always said that I could make a fortune by selling dog crap wrapped in gold foil at a dollar a chunk, and now all I have to do is get some gold foil and the DNC's voter address list...