previous post next post  

The Whatziss, revealed

Bad Cat Robot got it right first. Ball bearings. Those gunners were indeed cleaning and lubricating the ball bearings for the rotating platform of a large gun.  Many of the johnny-come-lately's further correctly refined things, but since they didn't play in earlier rounds, I have no idea if they were the beneficiaries of previous analysis, or just coming in late and seeing the whole thing in context... ball_bearings.jpg

Austro-Hungarian M14 42cm coastal howitzer being emplaced on the Italian Front during World War I. Coastal gun, but being used by the *koff* mobile army. World War I was really the last hurrah for this kind of thing (some examples during WWII, including the US "Little David" mortar notwithstanding) as the maturation of the airplane, and the logisitical costs of these things made them untenable. It took 32 rail cars to move this monster, and since it fired shells weighing 1000 lbs (kgs), it consumed an enormous amount of log tail to keep it shooting. When you can do the same thing cheaper with an airplane dropping a 1000 lb bomb...

BCR's prize?  Shooting party at the Castle, if she ever bestirs herself from the PNW and risks agoraphobia here in the Great Plains, where mountains don't hem your view...

9 Comments

Well, wasn't I right when I said in the first reply that they were cannonballs?  They are balls from a cannon, but the ones that make it move around, not just backwards.
 

[Sound of game show "blat" buzzer for a wrong answer]

Whinger.

 
Bah! :)

Kudo's to the Mistress of Ingenuity and Global Domination!
 
Congrats to BCR!

And I can take some solace in the fact that at least I got the age of the photo right...
 
Oh, and Terrapod - I don't care where so much as I want pictures.
 
NOW, THOSE ARE REAL 'bearings'! 
 
Regarding the relative efficiency of firing a shell vs. dropping a bomb:-  The British Navy flew landplanes from their battleships for recon and fire spotting purposes in WW1.  The planes were fitted with airbags to help flotation, so with a bit of luck they (and the pilot) could be picked up before they sank.  So long as they could retreive the pilot, they figured that they broke even, because the cost of large battleship shells was close to the cost of the plane!
 
According to the reference I have ( and the formula WT(LBS) = 1/2 D**3 ) the shell weight would be more like 1000KG than 1000 LBS where D = muzzle diameter in inches. Range was 15000yds. 
 
You're correct, IBM.  I was just being an American and reverting to default thought habits.