Gates rattled off examples of costly bureaucracy inside the military, as well. A simple request for a dog-handling team in Afghanistan must be reviewed and assessed at multiple high-level headquarters before it can be deployed to the war zone. “Can you believe it takes five four-star headquarters to get a decision on a guy and a dog up to me?” Gates said to reporters Friday.
I could go on to wonder (as have many others) why we have a lot more General Officers (and associated staffs) burning up a small mountain of coal daily tweaking Powerpoint® presentations all while managing (because that's what 98% of them do, manage, not lead) a military force that is a little over one eighth the size of our World War II armed forces, but I won't. Congress is to blame, too. After all, what Senator who was *earned* that title wants to be briefed by a mere Colonel, eh, ma'am?
Instead, I'll just take this statement: “Can you believe it takes five four-star headquarters to get a decision on a guy and a dog up to me?”
And say - "Gee, Mr. Secretary, I can't believe that a decision on a guy and a dog has to get to you."
If you're making those kinds of decisions, that's just another reason the Services have put that many Generals in the loop.



When I first got involved in printing, I was working for the Navy as a civilian GS-5. One day, I brought a problem to my boss, a GS-13, and he gave me the gift of one of his 10-second training courses.
"Is this," he asked. "a GS-5 problem or a GS-13 problem?" "Remember," he continued, "your job is to take work off my desk, not put it on." Lesson learned.