<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for Sniper rifle improvements to see testing this spring</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/sniper_rifle_im.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/sniper_rifle_im_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:06:11 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>Sniper rifle improvements to see testing this spring</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Sniper rifle improvements to see testing this springMar 4, 2010By C. Todd LopezWASHINGTON (Army News Service, March 3, 2010) -- Candidates for an improved version of the Army's sniper rifle -- the M-24 -- are expected to go into testing this spring after industry reveals their efforts this month.Industry was challenged to improve the M-24 sniper rifle, a weapon that has been in service since the 1980s, to make it more accurate and to make it more adjustable to the Soldier's needs, said Col. Douglas A. Tamilio, project manager, Soldier Weapons.&quot;So the Soldier, the sniper, can conform it to his...]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/sniper_rifle_im.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/sniper_rifle_im.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:26:05 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from 7mm Crank on 2010-03-11</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[7.62?&nbsp; That is obviously 0.62mm too big.&nbsp;]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/sniper_rifle_im.html#comment-99971</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/sniper_rifle_im.html#comment-99971</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:04:34 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Dave on 2010-03-09</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[After watching recent episodes of Top Sniper and Modern Sniper on the Discovery-Military channel. The call for improvements for the M-24 seems to already have taken place most shooters have very non-stock M-24's or use a variety of other weapons. Often it seems the shooters have a multitude of weapons so they can select the best&nbsp;tool for the mission.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/sniper_rifle_im.html#comment-99890</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/sniper_rifle_im.html#comment-99890</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:06:10 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John (Not The Armorer) on 2010-03-09</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Interesting!<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/sniper_rifle_im.html#comment-99872</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/sniper_rifle_im.html#comment-99872</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 07:28:49 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


