<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for I understand (don&apos;t agree with, but understand)..</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:06:03 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>I understand (don&apos;t agree with, but understand)..</title>
            <description><![CDATA[...why the IRS feels the need to have shotguns for their ASSWIPR* teams.&nbsp; 

But, I don't understand the need for the Department of Education to have combat shotguns.

Of course, I'm not all that sure I understand the need for a cabinet-level Department of Education, but that's a different rant.

Hey, I thought we were all about zero-tolerance when it comes to guns in education?]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:53:28 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Greyhawk on 2010-03-15</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Maybe they want to teach someone a lesson.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-100103</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-100103</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:37:41 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Justthisguy on 2010-03-14</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I hope that will happen, Grumpy. Even better, and even less likely, would be justice being done.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-100066</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-100066</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 02:09:29 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Grumpy on 2010-03-13</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Justthisguy, The Killing of Dean was a turning point in many people's eyes about this strange idea called mil-blogging.&nbsp;&nbsp;This County in the State of Maryland had a prosecutor with a sniper team. The sniper had to wait all of 14 hours to decide to kill this Ranger, oh, the inconvenience of it all. This ranger was looking at another tour of duty in Afghanistan for another year. &nbsp;He had no down time.&nbsp;<br />
<br />
The important thing was that word got out, a couple of bloggers and commenters got together online and came up with a plan. Actually rather simple, one of the bloggers who lives in the area wrote a letter and printed two copies. One would be sent standard first-class mail, the second would be sent certified mail with return receipt requested. The only thing requested was a copy of The Final Report from the Investigation of the Death of James Emerick Dean.<br />
<br />
I believe there will be a &quot;Day of Reckoning&quot; and *all of the Truth* will come out.<br />
<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-100058</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-100058</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:43:05 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Argent on 2010-03-13</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[You know I think this could tie in with John's favourite Ammendment.<br />
<br />
I remember while I was at uni a 'gunman' who was at the nearby hospital emergency (who from memory shot one of the patients) went into the university afterwards.&nbsp; It was a rather rapid lockdown but let's face it no one there had the means to stop him very reliably including security.<br />
<br />
The police were really rather slow so I suppose a Dept of Education would prefer a faster response.&nbsp; This leads to the redundancy problems.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-100030</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-100030</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 03:36:06 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Justthisguy on 2010-03-13</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Well, Grumpy, that's cop logic. &quot; He's suicidal and armed, which could result in his getting dead, which is bad. Therefore, we'll shoot him dead ourselves, which is good, because we did it.&quot;<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-100028</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-100028</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:30:05 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Grumpy on 2010-03-12</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[This has been a very educational thread, no pun intended. The problem that I see on the two sides of this same coin is this, the Second Amendment view on Firearms and over militarization of law enforcement. You can not change one side without changing the other. We, including myself, talk about the Right to Bear Arms. But do we talk about the responsibility of bearing arms? Law Enforcement the applies to you! This brings to mind an event that happened Christmas 2006, a little earlier that month an Army Ranger by the name of James Emerick Dean, just came home from Iraq. He was supposed to be going into Irregular Reserves, getting out. &nbsp;Well, SOMEBODY'S infantile logic, he received orders back into active duty to ship with another unit to Afghanistan, shortly. He had a small gauge shotgun in his trailer. The trailer was isolated, the only person he could really harm was himself. Yes, he was suffering from depression. Don't worry, the law enforcement sniper cured his depression.<br />
<br />
Take a moment and Google &quot;James Emerick Dean&quot;.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-100024</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-100024</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:18:41 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Cricket on 2010-03-12</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Bloodspite,&nbsp; we there there during when that happened...<br />
<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-100020</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-100020</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:28:15 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Cannonshop on 2010-03-12</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[That kid probably went on to head the property/arms room at Dept. of Homeland Security!<br />
<br />
<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-100018</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-100018</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:01:08 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from BillT on 2010-03-12</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[In 1971, Fort Dix went into lockdown when a 2d BCT&nbsp;Brigade Class A agent (who was not the narrator) could only find two of the three rounds he had been issued for his M1911.<br />
<br />
For twenty hours.<br />
<br />
The incoming Brigade OOD (an astute and devilishly good-lookin' young Captain) wandered over to where the highly-unhappy Brigade commander was morosely staring at the pistol, the magazine, and the two loose rounds, picked up the pistol, racked the slide, and out popped -- guess what?<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-100017</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-100017</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:31:27 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from BloodSpite on 2010-03-12</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Heh.<br />
I remember when Lewis was locked down over 2/75th losing an AT4 during a FTX<br />
<br />
My 1SG&nbsp;and sat in the Duty Office drinking coffee trying to figure out how you lose something that durn big....<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-100016</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-100016</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:32:12 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2010-03-12</title>
            <description>
                Yeah, CS, that about covers my point.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-100015</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-100015</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:52:07 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Cannonshop on 2010-03-12</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Being sick for five days makes me too serious, I think.&nbsp; I've spent the last week (seven days, really-it's friday now...) battling a cold with all the trimmings (Sore throat, postnasal drip, massive fatigue, and little gremlins trying to pry my skin off with wedges, and of course, the obligatory fever that is the 'setpoint' at which I&nbsp;won't go to work in spite of being sick.)<br />
<br />
It renders my perception of humour a bit...oh, less perceptive.<br />
<br />
(That, and I'm kind of a dunderhead anyway.)<br />
<br />
but following the path of Boq's note on federal responses, you'd think they'd have learned from serving a misdemeanour failure-to-appear in Idaho back in '92-I mean, it cost them lots of credibility, the life of an agent, two potential witnesses/bystanders, and three million dollars when the lawsuit hit, not to mention having the case thrown out.<br />
<br />
For those who're new-I'm talking about a nut named Randy Weaver here.&nbsp; What should have been a slam-dunk warrant service turned into a multi-week standoff and killed two civilians and one agent (and the dog), one of whom was a minor child, and the other was holding a loaded baby-over a failure-to-appear in a questionable firearms case.<br />
<br />
So...there's reason to be concerned when the Pros are screwing up like that, and we see Amatuers getting the same hardware and trained to the same doctrine (without having to meet the minimum standards the professionals would), on the taxpayer dime.<br />
<br />
And that doesn't even account for the poor accounting practices of agencies like HLS,&nbsp; USBP, or TSA-losing firearms? when I was in a NON infantry unit in the early nineties, one piece of unaccounted brass kept half our battalion out on the range for a week until it was found.&nbsp; One would think that agencies tasked to law-enforcement would have higher standards, not lower, in accounting for things that go 'bang' and can potentially put holes in people.<br />
<br />
The mind BOGGLES at what this says about our GS-ratings out there, particularly now that we have the&nbsp; Party in power that likes loose ROE&nbsp;for domestic incidents and ridiculously tight ROE&nbsp;for foreign incidents.&nbsp; (the goals of Waco couild've been accomplished by two guys in suits with a sherriff's escort, the Davidians actually called '911' during the opening stages of the assault....which was staged on the last day the warrant had before it expired after a month of fiddle-(Censored) around.)<br />
<br />
The real concern I see, is that agencies whose job IS&nbsp;NOT to storm buildings or free hostages getting that week-of-training every-three-years killing themselves or some innocent bystander playing barney-fife with hardware they don't have a genuine need to have-which boils down to what John the Armorer said about rationalizing our Federal Law Enforcement types.<br />
<br />
If I, as a tax-payer am paying for this shit, the shit better be in the hands of people who know what they're doing-and more importantly, know what they're SUPPOSED&nbsp;TO&nbsp;DO, including minding their backstops and pursuing less...bloody...means whenever practical or possible.&nbsp; (Hey, if it's good enough to saddle the DoD with, it's good enough to saddle the FBI with.)<br />
<br />
They should also be held accountable for WHERE&nbsp;their weapons are.&nbsp; &quot;Lost&quot;?&nbsp; Weapons will stop being 'lost' when lost weapons translate into lost federal jobs, lost federal benefits, and corruption charges with convictions, or firing for incompetence.<br />
<br />
Those entrusted with a badge and gun, must be held to the highest possible standards, because they are given a leeway in their actions that joe citizen does not have.<br />
<br />
<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-100014</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-100014</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:45:39 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2010-03-12</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Cannonshop - I think Boq (up high in the stream) twigged to what they were going to do with the weapons.<br />
<br />
I still think that Accountancy SWAT teams spread to hell and gone is a bad idea.<br />
<br />
And I was mostly goofing on the 2A thing.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-100006</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-100006</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:35:32 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Cannonshop on 2010-03-12</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[In response to your response to my response (Redundancy lives!!)...<br />
<br />
Yes, the second amendment's purpose is to serve as a check on tyranny.&nbsp; HOWEVER, that doesn't negate the utility of pitting would-be dictators against one another, or hamstringing the ability of any single agency to accumulate too much power in relation to the others.&nbsp; Citizens taking up arms is the LAST RESORT, the more barriers to things getting that bad (where the citizens HAVE to take up arms), the better-because once the shooting starts, history shows that regardless of who wins, the Constitution and the Citizenry lose.<br />
<br />
This was a point that was stressed, oddly enough, back when I was involved in the so-called &quot;Militia Movement&quot;&nbsp;in the nineties.&nbsp; It's better to fight tyranny at the ballot-box and the board-room, than in the streets....<br />
<br />
<br />
Now, it IS&nbsp;goofy, but-<br />
<br />
Postal Inspectors have gone armed for a long time (a VERY long time, I&nbsp;remember seeing a surplus sale of Ruger Security Six handguns from their investigation service.)&nbsp; Dept. of Education? well.... an analysis of &quot;What are they doing&quot;&nbsp;probably is in order-My guess would be the arms are for non-school building security.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-100005</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-100005</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:26:45 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from BloodSpite on 2010-03-12</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[For years they have been cutting in to the DoD's budget. WHich of course supplies us weapons, armorer, equipment etc.<br />
<br />
So...when do we cut in to the DoE's?<br />
<br />
I guess they could always try to sugar coat this with a good advertising campaign.<br />
Couple of Remington 870 Express's with the tag line<em> &quot;It's for the Children! (tm)&quot;</em><br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-100001</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-100001</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:54:52 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from BillT on 2010-03-12</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[You could outfit a Spec Ops battalion with the stuff HLS, the Border Patrol, and TSA lose each year...<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99995</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99995</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:19:40 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from MAJ Mike on 2010-03-12</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Soooooo, when will we start to see media accounts about lost or misplaced Department of Education firearms?&nbsp; <br />
<br />
Hell, Homeland Security apparently misplaces pistols, rifle, and shotguns all the time.&nbsp; Even the Secret Service seems to have a similiar problem.&nbsp; Unless they're giving skeet lessons, I see no reason for Department of Education shotguns.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99989</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99989</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:14:56 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Fishmugger on 2010-03-12</title>
            <description>
                I may be a little fuzzy on the details...but...in one of those incidences where a wacko started shooting at a school; a teacher raced out to his car got his pistol, went back in and tagged the perp. It was one of those in New York State or close. The authorities kept the details out of the press and the media didn&apos;t want to glorify the teacher...a NRA member. This was 3 or 4 years ago.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99988</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99988</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:09:04 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Cricket on 2010-03-12</title>
            <description>
                Maybe they need to recover their student loans?
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99987</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99987</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 07:50:44 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Cricket on 2010-03-12</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I know what you're saying; I guess what it comes down to is the DoEd is scared, or they see others with their security and want it as well.&nbsp; Why, I have no idea.&nbsp; But, in regard to carrying guns on school grounds, I&nbsp;think those are local ordinances, or state, not federal.<br />
<br />
I had one principal tell me privately that since the school massacre in Chechnya, several teachers were carrying. &nbsp;He didn't say if they had the weapons with them, or in their cars, but he thought it the height of idiocy to advertise a 'gun-free' zone since a perp isn't going to care about the law anyway.&nbsp; <br />
<br />
While I am not a strategic analyst, I would far rather my son's teacher was armed, and knowledgeable in its use and had access rather than waiting for the cops to get there.<br />
The high school, on the otter heiny, is totally....pc.<br />
<br />
You may now commence firing tomatoes.&nbsp; I need to make spaghetti sauce, so just make sure they aren't too ripe.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99986</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99986</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 07:45:13 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from fdcol63 on 2010-03-12</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<em>&quot;I shudder at the thought of what the National Endowment of the Arts SWAT team looks like.&quot;</em><br />
<br />
The Village People?&nbsp; LOL]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99984</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99984</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:35:53 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from BillT on 2010-03-12</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Just a hunch, but based on numbers, accoutrements, and the fact that they already have an *existing* armory, they're not looking to equip a roving Forced Entry Team for local situations -- they want a QRF at the Federal level. <br />
<br />
For *their* offices. <br />
<br />
You know -- for when all those thousands of protesters demanding school vouchers decide to storm the building.<br />
<br />
Your mileage may vary.<br />
<br />
Personally, I'm curious about *when* the Department of Education bureaucrats entered the arms race, because that will go a long way toward answering *why* they did...]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99983</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99983</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:58:33 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John (Not The Armorer) on 2010-03-11</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[There is ZERO&nbsp;justification for arming ANYONE in the Department of Education.<br />
<br />
There is ZERO&nbsp;justification for having the Department of Education.<br />
<br />
Fix the latter and the former problem goes away.&nbsp; And we save a boat load of money<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99981</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99981</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:54:47 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Justthisguy on 2010-03-11</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Umm, jim b?&nbsp; I think I can speak for The Donovan when I say we like to keep things on a higher, more light-hearted and subtle, yet intellectually serious, plane here.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99980</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99980</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:35:50 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from jim b on 2010-03-11</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[It is unacceptable to have weapons on any school grounds. Even with a concealed carry permit, you would be in deep do do if you had one. We post signs saying no weapons on all school ground ... parking lots etc.<br />
<br />
This is a first step. I believe we should all be all over our Congressmen and Senators about this.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99979</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99979</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:25:06 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from jim b on 2010-03-11</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Thanks for the info John. This is simply unacceptable. The Dept of Ed is morphing into 'Brown Shirts&quot;. I&nbsp;plan to be all over this.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99978</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99978</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:21:01 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Justthisguy on 2010-03-11</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[When I was a&nbsp; NASA co-op at Redstone Arsenal back in the early Seventies, I had to get a special clearance to go to a trailer in the Army part of the Arsenal, to mind a videocam taking pictures of meteor trails.&nbsp; The checkpoint I had to pass to get there had a couple of&nbsp; DoD cops, rather sleepy looking, with old-fashioned S&amp;W six-shooters on their hips. I think the guns were prolly deadly enough,&nbsp; not sure about the putative wielders of same.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99977</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99977</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:01:09 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2010-03-11</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[No, I mean rationalize Federal law enforcement.<br />
<br />
If you really need SWAT support, get the Marshals, FBI, or Secret Service to provide it.<br />
<br />
Not every Federal Agency withsome&nbsp;law enforcement interest indulging their&nbsp;delusions of grandeur living out their Walter Mitty fantasies of Harry Callahan.<br />
<br />
Or use local LEOs to for the service.<br />
<br />
Does the DoEd Fraud Unit really need to be assaulting into buildings?]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99970</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99970</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:01:12 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Cricket on 2010-03-11</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[You mean, federalize security?&nbsp; Won't that lead to a police state?&nbsp; This way, they are divided and confused....even more so than usual.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99969</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99969</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:48:39 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2010-03-11</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Well, I was gonna say, &quot;Vonnegut&quot; but I'm guessing that's somewhat redundant at this point...

But watch yer kiddleys, handicapper!]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99967</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99967</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:32:23 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Justthisguy on 2010-03-11</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[John, did you catch my joke there? I feel so lonesome at some times. The cat is a good friend, but he mostly ignores the silly human mouth noises.<br />
<br />
The reason I write this is to point out the Vonnegut story, &quot;Harrison Bergeron.&quot;<br />
<br />
I dislike bullies.&nbsp;]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99965</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99965</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:14:58 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2010-03-11</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Cannonshop - and here I thought that's what the 2nd Amendment was for...<br />
<br />
No, I think that Federal Law enforcement is over-militarized, as is law enforcement in general.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99963</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99963</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:19:40 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Justthisguy on 2010-03-11</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Wannabes and Geardos these days. Diana Moon Glampers did just fine with a double-barrelled 10-gauge.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99961</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99961</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:02:16 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Fishmugger on 2010-03-11</title>
            <description>
                I shudder at the thought of what the National Endowment of the Arts SWAT team looks like.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99960</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99960</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:19:55 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from BillT on 2010-03-11</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<blockquote>
LOP are designated as the only shotguns authorized for ED based on compatibility with ED <strong>existing shotgun inventory, certified armor and combat training and protocol</strong>, maintenance, and parts.
</blockquote><br />
ED = Department of Education.<br />
<br />
Existing shotgun inventory, certified armor and combat training and protocol.<br />
<br />
Those suckers are *serious* about student loan repayment.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99955</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99955</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:27:02 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Grumpy on 2010-03-11</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Armorer: Sir, I do believe there is a fatal flaw in your logic. You're trying to use *Common Sense and Government*, It'll never mix. I do believe that's an oxymoron.&nbsp;<br />
<br />
<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99953</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99953</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:11:29 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from cannonshop on 2010-03-11</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Actually, I can see it for one basic reason: 450 different agencies are a hell of a lot harder to subvert than one or two agencies.&nbsp;&nbsp; It's kind of the same reason that the Navy has an air-arm, the Army has aircraft, the Airforce has infantry, and the Marines have...well, everything, but aren't very big.<br />
<br />
A crowd of agencies means that no single agency head has too much power.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99952</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99952</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:10:38 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from BloodSpite on 2010-03-11</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Un;ess I miss my guess, Bo, I think what John is saying is that its foolish go to have 450 different CRT&nbsp;type units out there who report to 450 different departments, and all of them doing the same job for different amounts of money, with different ROE's etc.<br />
<br />
The weapons themselves aren't the issue, its the fact that everyone from the Dept of Education to the Dept of Government Kitty Litter changing has a SWAT team.<br />
<br />
I tend to agree that its just foolish and a real waste of money time and resources.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99950</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99950</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:10:49 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from AFSister on 2010-03-11</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Nope.&nbsp; Not buying it.<br />
I see no need for the Dept of Ed to need shotguns.&nbsp; Any school hostage/attack situations will be taken care of by the fully armed, locked and loaded, local police department.&nbsp; I can think of absolutely no situation which would require a Dept of Ed federal employee to need a gun.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99948</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99948</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:17:08 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Boquisucio on 2010-03-11</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<blockquote>
Agencies go by, require for them to be at the ready for the worst. Whether that is in itself an overkill which tramples our civil liberties, is open for question.
</blockquote>Not a mile from where I live, I see daily uniformed Department of Agriculture Police and FDA Police, policing around in their Chrysler 300 squad cars.&nbsp; And that's not counting their goons in black taking down doors as they serve warrants and subpoenas.<br />
<br />
Do you remember back in 1981 or 82 when those two FBI agents got greased because all they had were snub-nosed .38's, when they approached a drug informant?  I'm sure that a quick Google search will flesh out the details. Anyways, from that point on, the Feds go in loaded for bear whenever remotely approaching an unpredictable situation.<br />
<br />
That being said, that is the force projection doctrine that the Feds have.  Until that doctrine changes, Remington and Mossberg will keep on doing brisk business with the EPA, Smithsonian and other sundry bureaucracies.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99945</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99945</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:04:53 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2010-03-11</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I disagree, Boq.&nbsp; I think the Feds need to rationalize their law enforcement assets, rather than every department maintaining a dynamic entry force.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99942</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99942</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:36:12 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Boquisucio on 2010-03-11</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Poking around Dept of Ed's Office of Inspector General mission and programs, I'd venture to guess that these puppies are destined to their field office in Chi-City, as part of their Investigation Services Division.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/om/fs_po/oig/oig-orgchart.doc" rel="nofollow"><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255);"><strong><a href="http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/om/fs_po/oig/oig-orgchart.doc" rel="nofollow">http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/om/fs_po/oig/oig-orgchart.doc</a></strong></span></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/om/fs_po/oig/inv.html" rel="nofollow"><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255);"><strong><a href="http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/om/fs_po/oig/inv.html" rel="nofollow">http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/om/fs_po/oig/inv.html</a></strong></span></a> (look at the last bullet point)<br />
<br />
Wherever our government hands-out grants and federal funding, there is fraud to be found. And while it is almost always a white-collar crime, whenever the Feds serves a warrant or subpoena, they always come in loaded for bear.<br />
<br />
The Standard Operating Procedure that our Federal Law Enforcement Agencies go by, require for them to be at the ready for the worst. Whether that is in itself an overkill which tramples our civil liberties, is open for question. But as I see it, this procurement falls within their normal organizational mission and objectives.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99941</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/03/i_understand_do.html#comment-99941</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:25:21 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


