previous post next post  

A Good Read...

Awhile back, John was asked by a publicist at the Penguin Group in New York if he’d be interested in reviewing a book chronicling the lives of the two highest-scoring American aces in WWII: Richard Bong (the top scorer and US “Ace of Aces” in that conflict, with 40 kills) and Tommy McGuire, who barely missed being #1 (with 38 victories) when he died in the Southwestern Pacific theater near the end of the war.

The Armorer passed the tasking to me as the fixed-wing rep on the blog and I readily accepted, since I frankly knew a lot less about both Bong and McGuire than I cared to admit. In fact, volumes have been written about the flyers in the European Theater and Hollywood has pretty much milked the Battle of Britain legend for about as much as that industry can, so brushing up on Bong and McGuire was something I looked forward to.

I don’t think I’d be far off the mark to say that only a handful of Americans have ever heard of these two guys—both Medal of Honor winners, by the way. Yet they dominated the skies over the Pacific theater in an airplane few would recognize, a two-engine fighter designed by the man who would later guide American engineers to develop the high-flying U-2, the hypersonic SR-71 and the other-worldly F-117 stealth fighter.

Aces High: The Heroic Saga of the Two Top-Scoring Aces of World War II is an enjoyable read. Hats off to Bill Yenne for adding to what is, to me, not enough recorded history about two of the most skilled air combat pilots the country has ever produced. The book gave me a better appreciation for what the USAAF accomplished, given the second-class status of the war in the Pacific, over the skies of New Guinea, the Philippines and the Southwestern Pacific in general. Ironically, our top-scoring pilot racked up his kills in a place few Americans had ever heard of, much less relate to. Moreover, the Allied effort in this sector was a long, hard slog that has receded in our collective memory and Yenne’s recounting of the conflict, however brief, revived my appreciation for what our Army and Navy accomplished in the Pacific in a little over three years.

There were some fascinating tidbits in the book that I had either been unaware of or forgotten. Charles Lindbergh's appearance in the book and his contribution to the war effort was fascinating...and reminded me of the man's uncanny talents as both an aviator and problem solver. Yenne effectively illustrates how the American icon acquitted himself quite well after his pre-war dalliance with the isolationist America First movement.  

That said, I would have enjoyed a little more insight into these two men from the perspective of their peers—other fighter pilots who flew with and fought with them. I’m not sure how much effort went into searching out and interviewing their surviving squadron mates but I think it would have painted a richer picture of who these men were. McGuire moved up rapidly as a leader both in combat and as an officer and it would have been interesting to hear from those who knew him what kind of leader he was.

As for their mount, the P-38 Lightning was ahead of its time…two engines, counter-rotating props, guns easily harmonized thanks to their position on the airframe, tricycle gear, etc., yet little is said about the airplane, other than it was fast, superior to the by-then nearly obsolete P-40s, and it was handy to have another motor when its partner failed or was damaged in an engagement. The Lightning, as previously mentioned, was one of Kelly Johnson’s first projects…methinks it may have contributed to both Bong’s and McGuire’s success in ways that made all the difference in who became the top combat pilots in any theater.

Sadly, neither of these men survived to see the final end of the War. Alas, what the enemy couldn’t do, aerodynamics (McGuire’s low-altitude stall/spin) and power plants (Bong’s engine failure) did. But Yenne’s contribution to their legacy and memory is a welcome and worthwhile read. 

8 Comments

I love the P-38 ... and the Cosair
 
I have not read the book, but the History Channels and the Military Channel have a lot of programs of the Pacific War campaigns which include interviews with many of the people involved. I believe this was a deliberate effort to record these first person accounts while they still could.
 
The book sounds interesting, and I don't doubt it includes a lot of detail, but Martin Caidin covered both in his history of the P-38, including the fact that McGuire was one of the few -38 jocks who could dogfight with Zeros, and win.

The Lightning was an amazing plane for its time; for a long time I've seen it as the WW2 equivalent to the F-4 Phantom II. But with guns. :)
 
Pilots had to be real careful when diving in a P-38. I had the opportunity to talk with a WW2 P-38 pilot while he was waiting for his computer to be repaired in a shop I worked in at the time.

He said, if you dived too steep or put too much power to the engine while diving, you'd run into what he called "a compressability problem". The air flowing over the wings would get so compressed that it became impossible to work the control surfaces.
 
Yup. Compressibility also built up along the leading edges of the airfoils (ever wonder why a jet's wings have a thinner camber than a prop-job's?) -- that and the large surface area of the engine pods provided just enough resistance to prevent the P-38 from breaking the sound barrier. Which was probably a good thing. You get control *reversal* when you break Mach.

I know (knew -- he died in 1995) a P-51 pilot who shot down an Me-262 and swore it was by pure luck -- he was diving and maneuvering for a shot at it, hit compressibility, the controls froze, and he figured the recoil from his guns might slow him down enough to regain control. So he squeezed the trigger and held it. The Schwalbe banked at about that time, and basically flew into his bullet stream.
 
Had a long comment explaining what happens in a "compressibility" situation but this system dumped it when I forgot to fill in my name. Suffice it to say, it's a little more complicated than that and it has to due with shock wave attachment and travel along the wing cross-section at various sub, trans and supersonic regimes. It's affected by wing leading edge shape, not just camber (the F-15 has a supercritical camber and it isn't that thin) and the "control reversal" was, I think, largely due to the Bell X-1's wing design, not as a result of going supersonic, per se. But I could be wrong...
 
Dusty - If you step back in your browser you ought to be able to recover a comment that gets lost like that.
 
I've recovered a "lost" comment that way before, to my surprise. Didn't expect a step back would display it.

Dusty, wasn't the key issue that the wing lost lift (when the air "burbled") while the tail didn't, creating a vicious cycle of a progressively deeper -and more dangerous- dive? I was under the impression that the P-38 dive flaps (not speed brakes) restored lift for the wing without changing the angle of attack, allowing the pilot to control the aircraft.

It's tragic that several hundred kits to update ETO aircraft was accidentally shot down by a Brit fighter. Adding dive flaps (and, later, hydraulically-boosted controls) addressed the the worst bugs left. Jerry got a nasty shock when a late-model -L would chase him straight down after a "split-S..."

I love me some Lightning! :)

On the other hand, I don't doubt Bill has a different reaction to P-38 than I do. Heh.

P.S. For once I actually used Preview to check my post. Imagine my surprise when clicked "Back," only to find an empty comment screen! Yikes.  For archival purposes, clicking "Forward" returned me to the Preview screen, where I found my brilliant thoughts awaiting final submission...

P.P.S. Hold on, wait, that last bit doesn't sound ri-click- ...