<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for Bring Out The S&apos;mores</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/01/bring_out_the_s.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/01/bring_out_the_s_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:08:11 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>Bring Out The S&apos;mores</title>
            <description>Thank God there were no incoming boogies...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/01/bring_out_the_s.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/01/bring_out_the_s.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 08:35:08 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Chris Taylor on 2010-01-21</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<strong>@Mike:</strong>&nbsp; The ERYX thing is both scary and knee slapper at the same time.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/01/bring_out_the_s.html#comment-97674</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/01/bring_out_the_s.html#comment-97674</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:01:31 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from JamesLee on 2010-01-21</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[They made a training video about the <em>Stark</em> as well, but I&nbsp;don't remember the mention of the rocket motor.&nbsp; It was more all the little mistakes that made the incident more trouble that it could have otherwise been.&nbsp; Like the guy not properly stowing his skivvies, and them getting sucked up into the pump system slowing down the de-flooding, and the guy who took the chain holding a cover on the phone jack, so the circuit shorted causing communication problems.<br />
<br />
For all the focus on Damage Control, continuously maintaining and testing watertight integrity, it sure doesn't take much for one thing to spiral out of control.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/01/bring_out_the_s.html#comment-97661</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/01/bring_out_the_s.html#comment-97661</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 08:06:42 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from AFSister on 2010-01-20</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I didn't realize that was the actual cause of the fire on the Stark.&nbsp; Interesting.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/01/bring_out_the_s.html#comment-97643</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/01/bring_out_the_s.html#comment-97643</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:04:21 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from SezaGeoff on 2010-01-20</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[After the <a href="http://www.dcfp.navy.mil/mc/museum/STARK/Stark3.htm" rel="nofollow">USS Stark incident</a>, which was set afire by the burning of the sustain motor on the Exocet rather than the warhead, the Australian Navy was very interested in the process.&nbsp; My wife was then attached to the Proof and Experimental branch, and they set up a test of a modified rocket motor that they wanted to trial on an old aluminium-structure destroyer before it was scuttled as a reef.&nbsp; To reduce problems with thrust, they modified/cut off the nozzle.&nbsp; A test was organised when the execs were present and everyone went to the control bunker to watch the test.&nbsp; It started OK, but then some pressure anomalies resulted in the missile motor exploding and spreading burning propellant everywhere!&nbsp; There was quite a delay before anyone could leave the bunker while the outside area was checked for burning or unburnt propellant chunks. An embarrassing fail by the boffins!]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/01/bring_out_the_s.html#comment-97633</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/01/bring_out_the_s.html#comment-97633</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:16:59 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Mike on 2010-01-20</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[A&nbsp;couple more great fails the second is a french ERYX&nbsp; that would just about make anyone soil themselves.&nbsp; The first i have no clue tis a failed missle launch from a ship though <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axk76-LS6uc&amp;NR=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axk76-LS6uc&amp;NR=1</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGf-sS4js5Y" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGf-sS4js5Y</a><br />
<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/01/bring_out_the_s.html#comment-97624</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/01/bring_out_the_s.html#comment-97624</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:22:54 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Attila on 2010-01-20</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Interesting. I can relate, in a way. With a launch malfunction on the Maverick, called a &quot;hangfire,&quot; that 10K lbs of thrust w/o release makes for an interesting few seconds of maximum rudder against the rather exciting yaw transients. Of course, in this case, at least the warhead went away.&nbsp;<br />
<br />
It also reminded me of why firefighting skills on a wartime vessel (or any vessel, for that matter) is kinda important. I think it made a difference in the Pacific in WWII (we were better at it than the Japs, or so I'm told).<br />
<br />
OBTW, mebbe the Navy's different, but we always spelled it &quot;Bogie.&quot; (Boogie is something you pick.) Also, one usually doesn't fire at bogies, it's the &quot;bandits&quot; we engage. One is a confirmed hostile, the other isn't. Just curious--what's standard ROE vis-a-vis terminology/engagement in the USN? -Attila<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/01/bring_out_the_s.html#comment-97611</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/01/bring_out_the_s.html#comment-97611</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:50:25 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Chris Taylor on 2010-01-20</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I didn't go to LiveLeak, but it looks like a GWS 30 <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_Dart_missile" rel="nofollow">Sea Dart</a>.&nbsp; I believe the Brits are the sole operator now, and all their modern gear is VLS, so odds are it's one of the old <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_42_destroyer" rel="nofollow">Type 42</a> DDGs.&nbsp; The Type 82s had their Sea Dart on the quarterdeck.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/01/bring_out_the_s.html#comment-97595</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/01/bring_out_the_s.html#comment-97595</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 10:23:52 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from JamesLee on 2010-01-20</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Ahh, the memories!&nbsp; Actually had to go to Live Leak and read the comments to see just what the heck that launcher was.&nbsp; Was certain it wasn't US, we never had one like that and everything is VLS now anyway.<br />
<br />
We sort of had a similar incident.&nbsp; Firing a test ASROC from the MK26, had a malfucntion in the latches that hold it, they are supposed to open after X-pounds of thrust, letting it fly.&nbsp; Problem is, the linkages to the latches were worn, and did not release.&nbsp; That thing burned on the rail until the fuel was expended.<br />
<br />
Was sort of amusing seeing the fire party advance with charged hoses, until someone yelled at them the torpedo itself was salt-water activated.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/01/bring_out_the_s.html#comment-97594</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2010/01/bring_out_the_s.html#comment-97594</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 10:05:48 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


