15 DECEMBER 2009
MILBLOGS GO SILENT FOR FELLOW BLOGGER
Milblogs Go Silent
The reason for this is two-fold. First, milblogs are facing an increasingly hostile environment from within the military. While senior leadership has embraced blogging and social media, many field grade officers and senior NCOs do not embrace the concept. From general apathy in not wanting to deal with the issue to outright hostility to it, many commands are not only failing to support such activities, but are aggressively acting against active duty milbloggers, milspouses, and others. The number of such incidents appears to be growing, with milbloggers receiving reprimands, verbal and written, not only for their activities but those of spouses and supporters.
The catalyst has been the treatment of milblogger C.J. Grisham of A Soldier's Perspective (http://www.
An excellent story on the situation with C.J. can be found at Military Times by clicking here.
While there have been new developments, the core problem remains, and C.J. is having to raise funds to cover legal expenses to protect both his good name and his career.
One need only look at the number of blogs by active duty military in combat zones and compare it to just a few years ago to see the chilling effect that is taking place.
Milblogs have been a vital link in getting accurate news and information about the military, and military operations, to the public. They have provided vital context and analysis on issues critical to operations and to the informed electorate critical to the Republic.
On Wednesday 16 December, readers will have the chance to imagine a world without milblogs, and to do something about it. Those participating are urging their readers to contact their elected representatives in Congress, and to let their opinions be known to them and to other leaders in Washington.
Some milblogs will remain silent for several days; some just for the day. All have agreed to keep the post about the silence and C.J. at the top of their blogs until Friday 18 December.
A Soldier's Perspective
You Served
Bouhammer
The American Legion
Laughing Wolf
Hugh Hewitt
This Ain't Hell
Castle Argghhh
Boston Maggie
Blackfive
Miss Ladybug
Hooah Wife
Kiss My Gumbo
Some Soldiers Mom
Assoluta Tranquillita
Knee Deep in the Hooah
Soldiers' Angel New York
Drunken Wisdom
Grim's Hall
From my position
CDR Salamander
Confederate Yankee
Chromed Curses
Homefront Six
Pvt Murphey's Law
Delta Bravo Sierra
The Sniper
Another Voice
Support your Local Gunfighter
Knottie' s Niche
Great Reader JihadGene
America's North Shore Journal
Righty in a Lefty State
Thunder Run
Gazing at the Flag
Neptunus Lex
Soldiers Angels Germany
Bring the heat, bring the stupid
Little Drops..... Into the pool of life.
The Gun Line
Thirdwavedave
In Iraq Now (at 56)
Milblogging.com
Army Houesehold6
Susan Katz Keating
The Mudville Gazette
Covering the story:
Instapundit
Michelle Malkin
National Review's The Corner
Ace of Spades
Jawa Report
Winds of Change
Cao's Blog
Free Republic
Dr. Melissa Clouthier
Villainous Company
The Washington Independent
You can donate to CJ's Legal Fund by logging into PayPal, go to the send money page, and put in his email: dj_chcknhawk (AT) yahoo (DOT) com; or, you can send donations directly to:
Grisham Legal Fund
c/o Redstone Federal Credit Union
220 Wynn Drive
Huntsville, AL 35893
Please write "Grisham Legal Fund" in the memo line if you use this option.
Milblogs have been a vital link in getting accurate news and information about the military, and military operations, to you. Today, many milblogs are gone and others are under attack from within and without. Today, you have the chance to imagine a world without milblogs, and to do something about it. Make your voice heard by writing your congressional representatives and others, and by making donations as you see fit.
The battle for freedom of speech and the marketplace of ideas is fought on many fronts and in many ways. Without your help, the battle may well be lost.
Illegitimus non carborundum
If you want to spout off about the military - resign and have at'er. Until then - button it!
And, I'm not sure how much "spouting off about the military" is going on. To me, "spouting off" implies malicious intent or careless disregard. The milbloggers I know - and greatly respect - aren't saying things out of carelessness, or to be spiteful, but to tell important stories, or to bring attention to things they view as issues that need addressing.
He's not in trouble over a military matter -- he took exception to the way his children were being treated in school. A *public* school. The school administer had her *feelings* hurt and lodged a complaint with the IG of CJ's command, who decided she should have redress for the damage to her exaggerated sense of self-esteem.
When did the chain of command expand to include civilians unconnected in any way with the military? Must be that "New Army" I keep hearing about.
Does the word "discipline" mean anything anymore?
Does the phrase "inappropriate command involvement" mean anything anymore?
You rightfully raise the question, "Does the word 'discipline' mean anything anymore?" First of all, discipline is a two way street, top down and then, and only then, will you earn the respect. This is called, "Commanding Respect". As our leaders, lead the rest will follow, this is the only leadership that will result in the discipline, that you seek.
We aren't talking about military or national secrets here, a soldier still has the right to have a life.
GO MilBlogs!!!!!
The sound of all those milbloggers making a googlebomb with their keyboards might be more appropriate.
I'm reminded of the old "tree falling in the forest" simile.
Meaning that if they shut down the blogs, the lose their end-run around the MSM for getting out their stories.
The ones they like as well as the ones they don't.
It wasn't a perfect idea, nor perfectly executed, but it has some impact along the lines of what we were looking for.
The point wasn't how powerful we are - with a few exceptions, we aren't - but how useful we are, even if we're unruly about it. And that utility is independent of who sits in the Oval Office any given year.
As for the Googlebomb aspect of it - the use of virtually the same verbiage, and the coverage of the event by several mid- and upper-tier bloggers and news/magazine sites, had exactly that effect, and in a more coherent fashion than if we'd all done 75 different posts.
Concomitantly, an increase in milblogging, miltweeting carries with it an increased risk.
How does the military respond?
The bonehead response is to shut down milblogging and miltweeting (citing the security risk). Such a response requires no thinking, and is very Old School.
The New School might put together workshops of security managers and try to come up with a more moderate solution, one involving acceptance of low thresholds of risk and allowing milblogging and miltweeting.
I'm on the fence. I was USAF Strategic Air Command, a VERY Old School outfit. I was a Squadron Security Officer within that strac Command, responsible for training, and in some ways performance, under strict security guidelines. Having been SAC-umcised, you couldn't beat the Old School out of me with a stick, but I also consider myself a modern thinker when it comes to information transfer/sharing.
There has to be a way to "vet" military members who would then have milblogging/miltweeting access, and restrict those activities from those who would do it unsupervised. That middle-of-the-road path might be hard to find, but we must persevere to find it.
For civilians, there must be NO rules. The First guarantees that. For dependents, it gets foggier, and dependents will probably wind up having to follow active-member rules.
This isn't the only culture clash between military leadership and looser civilian custom, and it won't be the last, either.
-SMM