<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for Today&apos;s Medal of Honor Moment for 15 November</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/11/todays_medal_of_173.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/11/todays_medal_of_173_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:10:51 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>Today&apos;s Medal of Honor Moment for 15 November</title>
            <description><![CDATA[There have been two Medals awarded for actions on this day in history.&nbsp; The first Medal awarded for actions on this day didn't occur until 83 years after the first version of the Medal, the Naval one, was authorized in 1861.&nbsp; Even then, it was actually&nbsp;for a period of service covering a little over a month.&nbsp; The first Medal earned for a singular action on this day in history wasn't awarded until Korea.&nbsp;WWII - Dick Bong downs 8 Japanese aircraft in one month.BONG, RICHARD I. (Air Mission) Rank and organization: Major, U.S. Army Air Corps. Place and date: Over Borneo...]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/11/todays_medal_of_173.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/11/todays_medal_of_173.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:14:13 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2009-11-15</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I blame the reader.&nbsp; The author knew what he meant!]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/11/todays_medal_of_173.html#comment-95503</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/11/todays_medal_of_173.html#comment-95503</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 21:55:09 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Cortillaen on 2009-11-15</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Heh, the failings of the English language, then.&nbsp; Your remarks after the citation read, at least to me, like you were claiming the &quot;ruthless foe&quot; mentioned in the citation was PFC Jordan.&nbsp; I take it you actually meant along the lines of &quot;Calling the enemy a ruthless foe is jarring because PFC Jordan was the truly ruthless foe&quot;.&nbsp; For lack of a modifier...<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/11/todays_medal_of_173.html#comment-95502</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/11/todays_medal_of_173.html#comment-95502</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 21:00:13 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2009-11-15</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Corti - I don't understand your point.<br />
<br />
The ruthless foe refers to the Chinese.&nbsp; I was just observing that the ruthless one in this citation was Jordan.<br />
<br />
That's all.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/11/todays_medal_of_173.html#comment-95499</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/11/todays_medal_of_173.html#comment-95499</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:46:45 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Cortillaen on 2009-11-15</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<blockquote>
Citation:<br />
Upon orders for the platoon to withdraw and reorganize, Pfc. Jordan voluntarily remained behind to provide covering fire. Crawling toward an enemy machine gun emplacement, he threw 3 grenades and neutralized the gun. He then rushed the position delivering a devastating hail of fire, killing several of the enemy and forcing the remainder to fall back to new positions. He courageously attempted to move forward to silence another machine gun but, before he could leave his position, the ruthless foe hurled explosives down the hill and in the ensuing blast both legs were severed.
</blockquote><blockquote>
John:<br />
I find the phrase &quot;the ruthless foe hurled explosives down the hill&quot; just a little jarring, considering the ruthless foe in this piece was PFC Jordan!
</blockquote>I don't read it that way.&nbsp; Following the use of the pronoun &quot;he&quot;, it should still be meaning &quot;PFC Jordan&quot; from the first sentence quoted, so the last sentence should&nbsp;be:&nbsp; &quot;[PFC Jordan] <em>courageously attempted to move forward to silence another machine gun but, before</em>&nbsp;[PFC Jordan]&nbsp;<em>could leave his position, the ruthless foe hurled explosives down the hill and in the ensuing blast both legs were severed.</em>&quot;&nbsp; The &quot;ruthless foe&quot; being PFC Jordan doesn't make sense there, does it?]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/11/todays_medal_of_173.html#comment-95497</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/11/todays_medal_of_173.html#comment-95497</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 16:50:40 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


