<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for A new take on an old joke.</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/11/a_new_take_on_a.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/11/a_new_take_on_a_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:11:04 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>A new take on an old joke.</title>
            <description><![CDATA[...with an apology to paralegals.A man in a hot air balloon realized he was lost. He reduced altitude and spotted a woman below. Descending a bit more he shouted, &quot;Excuse me, can you help? I promised a friend I would meet him an hour ago, but I do not know where I am.&quot; The woman replied, &quot;You're in a hot air balloon, approximately 30 feet above the ground. You are between 40/41 degrees latitude, north, and 59/60 degrees west, longitude.&quot; &quot;You must be a paralegal or legal secretary&quot;, said the balloonist. &quot;I am&quot;, replied the woman, &quot;How did you know?&quot;...]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/11/a_new_take_on_a.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/11/a_new_take_on_a.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 04:19:41 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from RetRsvMike on 2009-11-12</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[..and then the other similar one that ends with &quot;..good, now gimme my sheep dog back.&quot;<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/11/a_new_take_on_a.html#comment-95402</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/11/a_new_take_on_a.html#comment-95402</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:50:45 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Mcart on 2009-11-12</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I've never actually seen a hot air balloon near Seattle. Doesn't sound safe with all the above ground wires, Boeing, Renton, and Seatac approaches.<br />
<br />
They do a huge balloon festival up in Monroe though right?]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/11/a_new_take_on_a.html#comment-95389</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/11/a_new_take_on_a.html#comment-95389</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:53:41 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from bad cat robot on 2009-11-12</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Yer all wrong, the version involving Microsoft is the funniest.&nbsp; Especially since around here in the Seattle area there are LOTS of hot air balloon enthusiasts and it could really happen.&nbsp; In my dissolute youth I even got to help launch one.&nbsp;]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/11/a_new_take_on_a.html#comment-95382</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/11/a_new_take_on_a.html#comment-95382</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:43:20 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from AFSister on 2009-11-12</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[As a balloon enthusiast.... that is extremely entertaining.<br />
SNORT!!]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/11/a_new_take_on_a.html#comment-95379</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/11/a_new_take_on_a.html#comment-95379</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 08:48:05 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from BillT on 2009-11-12</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<em>It's running through email. </em><br />
<br />
It ran through here a few years ago, illustrating the difference between a Warrant and an RLO.<br />
<br />
This version isn't nearly as funny, though...<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/11/a_new_take_on_a.html#comment-95377</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/11/a_new_take_on_a.html#comment-95377</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 08:41:47 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from JoeC on 2009-11-12</title>
            <description>
                Funny. I haven&apos;t seen that one yet... but I will.  Enough people think enough of me to SPAM me with their latest tickle..... including my wife.

            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/11/a_new_take_on_a.html#comment-95369</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/11/a_new_take_on_a.html#comment-95369</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:32:59 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2009-11-12</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Well, much as I would like to claim it as original work - it isn't.&nbsp; It's running through email.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/11/a_new_take_on_a.html#comment-95368</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/11/a_new_take_on_a.html#comment-95368</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:17:55 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from AW1 Tim on 2009-11-12</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<br />
&nbsp; You nailed that one, John...&nbsp; :)<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/11/a_new_take_on_a.html#comment-95367</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/11/a_new_take_on_a.html#comment-95367</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 05:50:37 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


