<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for ObamaCare supporters...otherwise known as &quot;thugs&quot;</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/obamacare_suppo.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/obamacare_suppo_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:14:10 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>ObamaCare supporters...otherwise known as &quot;thugs&quot;</title>
            <description>Any doubt as to why people are pissed?</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/obamacare_suppo.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/obamacare_suppo.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 21:57:45 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Cortillaen on 2009-09-03</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Ever wondered why the most common response (and I say &quot;response&quot; because it is in no way a defense or even a rebuttal) to any sort of charge against a leftist is &quot;You do it, too!&quot;? I used to. It kinda hit me in one of those &quot;D'oh!&quot; moments that it's a result of moral relativism. The lack of right and wrong in their minds creates a situation in which any action is morally justified so long as someone else has done it. They simply don't grasp the concept of &quot;It's wrong for anyone to do it, and this discussion is about your doing it&quot;. Of course, failing to find a sufficient example of mutual wrong-doing (and having the rare honesty to not falsely make the claim) does not make something wrong for them. In that situation, they fall back on the catch-all, universal pardon for moral relativists: &quot;The end justifies the means.&quot;<br />
<br />
&quot;It's your meeting...&quot;&nbsp; Uh, what?&nbsp; Since when do townhall meetings <em>belong</em> to anybody, much less only&nbsp;proponents of <strike>mutual suffering (except the exceptionally rich and political aristocracy</strike> utopia - pay no attention to the truth behind the curtain<strike>)</strike>?<br />
<br />
*sets out plate of snickerdoodles*&nbsp; Now there are.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/obamacare_suppo.html#comment-92890</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/obamacare_suppo.html#comment-92890</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 01:14:30 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Grumpy on 2009-09-02</title>
            <description>
                It is easy to attack, but maybe we should first *think* before we talk. We have two ears and one mouth, is there a lesson here on proportionality here? Both sides are *Guilty*! The person who is learning this the most is *GRUMPY*, me.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/obamacare_suppo.html#comment-92859</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/obamacare_suppo.html#comment-92859</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:23:15 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Maggie on 2009-09-02</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[&quot;Take their cookies and go home&quot;<br />
<br />
Wait!&nbsp; There are cookies?]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/obamacare_suppo.html#comment-92849</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/obamacare_suppo.html#comment-92849</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 12:15:02 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2009-09-02</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[AFSis - Yellow card on personal attacks.&nbsp;We don't know that ggg is an idiot, we just know that&nbsp;s/he's lazy. &nbsp;There's so much about ggg's argument (such as it is) to whack at there's no need to make him or her a pi&ntilde;ata.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/obamacare_suppo.html#comment-92845</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/obamacare_suppo.html#comment-92845</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:48:05 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from AFSister on 2009-09-02</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Boq-<br />
Last year our company scored a pretty big account.&nbsp; It was a teacher's union in Michigan.&nbsp; Before we went to visit them, we all suddenly got new business cards and were told to destroy the old ones.&nbsp; I couldn't figure out what the difference was- same design, same address, same contact info- everything.&nbsp; Then I saw this little bitty oval with &quot;GCUI&quot; in it.<br />
<br />
They made everyone in the company get new business cards printed by a UNION&nbsp;SHOP, just because we got new business in the middle of Union Country.<br />
<br />
What a freakin' waste of money.<br />
<br />
Oh, and ggg-<br />
You're an idiot.&nbsp; I don't know of any Democratic or liberal rallies that were crashed by Republicans or conservatives who were TOLD how to protest.&nbsp; We don't need instructions or little rolls of stickers. &nbsp;We're big kids and can take care of ourselves.&nbsp; Go back to the sheeple.&nbsp; baaaaaaaaaaa]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/obamacare_suppo.html#comment-92838</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/obamacare_suppo.html#comment-92838</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 10:54:18 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Boquisucio on 2009-09-02</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[That roll of printed stickers that he holds in his right hand... you know the one that reads: &quot;health care NOW&quot;...&nbsp; I wonder whether it was printed by Union Labor.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/obamacare_suppo.html#comment-92829</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/obamacare_suppo.html#comment-92829</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:39:51 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2009-09-02</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Oh, it's not just hilarious, it's lazy argumentation and not even good rhetoric.<br />
<br />
Don't argue the issue, just say, &quot;You're side does it too, so there!&quot;<br />
<br />
It's the argument of a six-year-old, and it's pathetic when it's all an adult has to offer.<br />
<br />
The question, ggg, isn't who does it - it's, &quot;Should it be done?&quot;&nbsp; By either side.<br />
<br />
Go away. Come back when you have something substantial to offer that rises above the level of &quot;I know you are, and so am I!&quot;&nbsp; <br />
<br />
Because that's pretty much all you offered.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/obamacare_suppo.html#comment-92826</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/obamacare_suppo.html#comment-92826</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 07:13:45 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from BillT on 2009-09-02</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<em>...when the conservatives do it, it's called 'being angry'.</em><br />
<br />
When *individuals* do it because they're angry, yeah, it's called &quot;being angry.&quot;<br />
<br />
<em>But when the shoes [sic] on the other foot suddenly now it's thuggish.</em><br />
<br />
When the cheerleaders are instructing you to simulate outrage and your hired SEIU goons are encouraged to slug people, yeah, that's thuggish -- especially when you consider that the term &quot;thug&quot; is a derivative of &quot;thuggee,&quot; a cult that silenced its victims through strangulation.<br />
<br />
<em>What hypocrisy.</em><br />
<br />
*That* coming from a Leftie is hilarious. You're irony-proof.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/obamacare_suppo.html#comment-92823</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/obamacare_suppo.html#comment-92823</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 03:46:52 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from ggg on 2009-09-02</title>
            <description>
                LMAO, when the conservatives do it, it&apos;s called &apos;being angry&apos;. But when the shoes on the other foot suddenly now it&apos;s thuggish. What hypocrisy.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/obamacare_suppo.html#comment-92820</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/obamacare_suppo.html#comment-92820</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:43:54 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Parrothead Jeff on 2009-09-02</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[No doubt about it in the least, Dusty.&nbsp; Thanks for posting!<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/obamacare_suppo.html#comment-92819</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/obamacare_suppo.html#comment-92819</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:41:46 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


