previous post next post  

ObamaCare supporters...otherwise known as "thugs"

By Dusty (AKA Attila of Argghhh!) on September 1, 2009 | | Comments (10)
Any doubt as to why people are pissed?

Creeps. Thugs. Scum. Leftist Astroturfing caught on tape...

Share This Article:

Share |

Categories:

10 Comments

By Parrothead Jeff on September 2, 2009 12:41 AM
No doubt about it in the least, Dusty.  Thanks for posting!
 
By ggg on September 2, 2009 12:43 AM
LMAO, when the conservatives do it, it's called 'being angry'. But when the shoes on the other foot suddenly now it's thuggish. What hypocrisy.
 
By BillT on September 2, 2009 3:46 AM
...when the conservatives do it, it's called 'being angry'.

When *individuals* do it because they're angry, yeah, it's called "being angry."

But when the shoes [sic] on the other foot suddenly now it's thuggish.

When the cheerleaders are instructing you to simulate outrage and your hired SEIU goons are encouraged to slug people, yeah, that's thuggish -- especially when you consider that the term "thug" is a derivative of "thuggee," a cult that silenced its victims through strangulation.

What hypocrisy.

*That* coming from a Leftie is hilarious. You're irony-proof.
 
By John of Argghhh! on September 2, 2009 7:13 AM
Oh, it's not just hilarious, it's lazy argumentation and not even good rhetoric.

Don't argue the issue, just say, "You're side does it too, so there!"

It's the argument of a six-year-old, and it's pathetic when it's all an adult has to offer.

The question, ggg, isn't who does it - it's, "Should it be done?"  By either side.

Go away. Come back when you have something substantial to offer that rises above the level of "I know you are, and so am I!" 

Because that's pretty much all you offered.
 
By Boquisucio on September 2, 2009 8:39 AM
That roll of printed stickers that he holds in his right hand... you know the one that reads: "health care NOW"...  I wonder whether it was printed by Union Labor.
 
By AFSister on September 2, 2009 10:54 AM
Boq-
Last year our company scored a pretty big account.  It was a teacher's union in Michigan.  Before we went to visit them, we all suddenly got new business cards and were told to destroy the old ones.  I couldn't figure out what the difference was- same design, same address, same contact info- everything.  Then I saw this little bitty oval with "GCUI" in it.

They made everyone in the company get new business cards printed by a UNION SHOP, just because we got new business in the middle of Union Country.

What a freakin' waste of money.

Oh, and ggg-
You're an idiot.  I don't know of any Democratic or liberal rallies that were crashed by Republicans or conservatives who were TOLD how to protest.  We don't need instructions or little rolls of stickers.  We're big kids and can take care of ourselves.  Go back to the sheeple.  baaaaaaaaaaa
 
By John of Argghhh! on September 2, 2009 11:48 AM
AFSis - Yellow card on personal attacks. We don't know that ggg is an idiot, we just know that s/he's lazy.  There's so much about ggg's argument (such as it is) to whack at there's no need to make him or her a piñata.
 
By Maggie on September 2, 2009 12:15 PM
"Take their cookies and go home"

Wait!  There are cookies?
 
By Grumpy on September 2, 2009 1:23 PM
It is easy to attack, but maybe we should first *think* before we talk. We have two ears and one mouth, is there a lesson here on proportionality here? Both sides are *Guilty*! The person who is learning this the most is *GRUMPY*, me.
 
By Cortillaen on September 3, 2009 1:14 AM
Ever wondered why the most common response (and I say "response" because it is in no way a defense or even a rebuttal) to any sort of charge against a leftist is "You do it, too!"? I used to. It kinda hit me in one of those "D'oh!" moments that it's a result of moral relativism. The lack of right and wrong in their minds creates a situation in which any action is morally justified so long as someone else has done it. They simply don't grasp the concept of "It's wrong for anyone to do it, and this discussion is about your doing it". Of course, failing to find a sufficient example of mutual wrong-doing (and having the rare honesty to not falsely make the claim) does not make something wrong for them. In that situation, they fall back on the catch-all, universal pardon for moral relativists: "The end justifies the means."

"It's your meeting..."  Uh, what?  Since when do townhall meetings belong to anybody, much less only proponents of mutual suffering (except the exceptionally rich and political aristocracy utopia - pay no attention to the truth behind the curtain)?

*sets out plate of snickerdoodles*  Now there are.