<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for A Twofer! Yanno, Sometimes, I Really Hate Myself...</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/a_twofer_yanno.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/10/a_twofer_yanno_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:13:08 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>A Twofer! Yanno, Sometimes, I Really Hate Myself...</title>
            <description>...for posting a Whatziss that&apos;s absolutely *no* challenge to you guys. But, I do it because I figure all y&apos;all deserve a break from trying to guess what arcane piece of dumpster bait get the exact nomenclature of John&apos;s latest toy from underneath the bench seat in the southwest corner of the Regimental Sar&apos;nt-Major&apos;s bunker during the Siege of Mafeking. However, this is not one of those times.Those of you who don&apos;t really have a life will should get this one right off the bat -- And, as always, I provide *context*!Now, the second one isn&apos;t really a Whatziss, but...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/a_twofer_yanno.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/a_twofer_yanno.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 02:00:43 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from J.M. Heinrichs on 2009-10-01</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[&nbsp;He was concentrating on two pairs; discards were only an option.<br />
<br />
Cheers<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/a_twofer_yanno.html#comment-93884</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/a_twofer_yanno.html#comment-93884</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:06:00 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Grumpy on 2009-10-01</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[@BillT, I need a minor one word clarification. You write, &quot;They were dressed for triple-digit heat, and we keep the sim bays cooled to 65F, so I was focused on a couple things, actually...&quot;. Now for accuracy and *context*, the clarification, were you focused on a couple of things or a couple of things *each*?&nbsp;]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/a_twofer_yanno.html#comment-93865</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/a_twofer_yanno.html#comment-93865</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 11:15:25 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from BillT on 2009-10-01</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[They were dressed for triple-digit heat, and we keep the sim bays cooled to 65F, so I was focused on a couple of things, actually...<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/a_twofer_yanno.html#comment-93848</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/a_twofer_yanno.html#comment-93848</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 03:39:12 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Grumpy on 2009-09-30</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Fishmugger,<br />
<br />
I would agree, in an *aircraft maintenance area*, proper attire should be worn. Problem, I saw nothing to suggest that actual aircraft maintenance was being done. If such activity was the center one's *only* attention, then I can see how you would draw such a conclusion. &quot;I'm sure Bill had that exact thought in mind.&quot; It appears to me, Bill was extremely focused on *context*.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/a_twofer_yanno.html#comment-93846</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/a_twofer_yanno.html#comment-93846</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 22:50:13 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Argent on 2009-09-30</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[First one looks like a connector for what?&nbsp; Bombs?&nbsp; But that's the shadow of civ thinking.<br />
<br />
The second looks like 2 tactical distraction devices.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/a_twofer_yanno.html#comment-93845</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/a_twofer_yanno.html#comment-93845</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:10:19 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Fishmugger on 2009-09-30</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Grumpy,<br />
<br />
In an aircraft maintenance area proper attire should be worn at all times to prevent exposure to chemicals and other hazards. A bare or naked mid-rift is a ground safety violation...cute..but something is definitely being violated here. Someone should read her a regulation or two. I'm sure Bill had that exact thought in mind.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/a_twofer_yanno.html#comment-93843</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/a_twofer_yanno.html#comment-93843</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:44:17 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Grumpy on 2009-09-30</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[After having some fun, I think your &quot;whatziss&quot; is a mounting pod, installed under the fuselage during an upgrade for a camera. If it is the one I am thinking of, you could fly at a relatively high altitude and still provide &quot;Contextualized Statical Data&quot;.&nbsp;<br />
<br />
@Fishmugger, I agree the &quot;Whatziss&quot; is probably a mounting pod for a camera. Maybe you could enlighten me, what would be the ground safety violation?<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/a_twofer_yanno.html#comment-93840</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/a_twofer_yanno.html#comment-93840</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:08:06 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Mike L on 2009-09-30</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I know - context is everything.&nbsp; So all I can think of is a cock pit.&nbsp; Sorry.&nbsp; ML<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/a_twofer_yanno.html#comment-93836</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/a_twofer_yanno.html#comment-93836</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:04:55 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Slinky on 2009-09-30</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[It appears to be&nbsp;a launch rail for an AIM-9 or AGM-114. Bill's comment about &quot;Hovering&quot;&nbsp;implies&nbsp;but helicopter underwing launch rails usually come in &quot;4-Packs&quot;. The fact that this is a single rail implies that this is a fixed wing platform.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/a_twofer_yanno.html#comment-93832</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/a_twofer_yanno.html#comment-93832</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:47:41 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from fdcol63 on 2009-09-30</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Looks like something else might have been &quot;hovering&quot;.&nbsp; LOL]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/a_twofer_yanno.html#comment-93830</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/a_twofer_yanno.html#comment-93830</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:01:43 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from BillT on 2009-09-30</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<em>They look like the USO girls from the Trump ceremony. If they are,</em> <br />
<br />
Nope.<br />
<em><br />
What happened to the blonde?</em><br />
<br />
She's the next clue.<br />
<br />
Hey, c'mon, there's *always* a blonde...<br />
<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/a_twofer_yanno.html#comment-93829</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/a_twofer_yanno.html#comment-93829</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:48:05 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Boquisucio on 2009-09-30</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Flying with <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AR_4V-0_3l4" rel="nofollow"><strong>GingerKids</strong></a>, even if they are sporting strategically placed green stars... Are they good luck in the Good Ship Hubert?<br />
<br />
<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/a_twofer_yanno.html#comment-93827</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/a_twofer_yanno.html#comment-93827</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:32:40 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2009-09-30</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Heh. I haven't read the post yet, just Grumpy's emailed comment, but I think I'm being mocked!<br />
<br />
ha-RUMPH!<br />
<br />
And I have *never* used anything from the Siege of Mafeking&nbsp; (Okay, I&nbsp;read the post before I&nbsp;finished the comment).<br />
<br />
Yet.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/a_twofer_yanno.html#comment-93826</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/a_twofer_yanno.html#comment-93826</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:30:03 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Pogue on 2009-09-30</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I think hovering the sim is tougher than hovering the real thing...<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/a_twofer_yanno.html#comment-93825</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/a_twofer_yanno.html#comment-93825</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:10:37 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Fishmugger on 2009-09-30</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[The first picture looks like some camera mount hung off the bottom of one of your whirly thingies.<br />
<br />
I'm not sure what the second picture is of as my eyes keep going out of focus from staring too hard. The shirt would be a ground safety violation but who's going to tell her. They look like the USO girls from the Trump ceremony. If they are, I was smooched by the Redhead...and lived to tell about it. What happened to the blonde??]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/a_twofer_yanno.html#comment-93824</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/a_twofer_yanno.html#comment-93824</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:50:14 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from BillT on 2009-09-30</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Context? Oh. Ooooooh -- <em>context</em>, right, right, right! <br />
<br />
Sorry -- got the <a href="http://www.fototime.com/%7BF4B00F78-E86F-4F67-AF60-06F4CF7D2835%7D/origpict/SepSim%2009%2005.JPG" rel="nofollow"><strong>Hi-Rez Context</strong></a> right here...<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/a_twofer_yanno.html#comment-93823</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/a_twofer_yanno.html#comment-93823</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:58:41 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Grumpy on 2009-09-30</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I don't have a clue, but I'm sure John will be glad to know he comes from the fine tradition of &quot;dumpster divers&quot;. Two final points, you have a fine eye for &quot;context&quot; and you have proven, that &quot;context&quot; matters. You have really proven that you understand that fact. Yeah! Now, back to sleep. BillT, thanks and have great week.&nbsp;]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/a_twofer_yanno.html#comment-93822</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/09/a_twofer_yanno.html#comment-93822</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 03:17:36 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


