<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for Someone has been channeling John...</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/08/someone_has_bee.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/08/someone_has_bee_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:15:49 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>Someone has been channeling John...</title>
            <description><![CDATA[...regarding the miniscule number of Medals of Honor awarded in the current conflict.Eight years of war in Afghanistan and Iraq. About 4,000 members of the U.S. military killed in action. More than 34,000 wounded. Just six considered worthy of America's highest military award for battlefield valor.For some veterans and members of Congress, that last number doesn't add up.The Pentagon's explanation is that &quot;it's a different kind of war. The enemy uses IEDs and we use Predators.&quot;Which begs the question of why so few have been awarded for valorous deeds in actual contact. And there have been a *lot* of actual...]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/08/someone_has_bee.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/08/someone_has_bee.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 05:47:37 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2009-08-03</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Oh - Cannonshop - I can't buy that one at all.&nbsp; This isn't a war where generals find themselves in combat, and they all know it.&nbsp; I&nbsp;really don't think your scenario is active.<br />
<br />
I think it's politics, mostly, with a smidge of what SAJames had to say.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/08/someone_has_bee.html#comment-91615</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/08/someone_has_bee.html#comment-91615</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 07:54:28 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2009-08-03</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[La Migra - tell it to <a href="http://www.cmohs.org/medal-history.php" rel="nofollow">these guys</a>.<br />
<br />
SA James - maybe.&nbsp; Certainly possibly true on a unit-by-unit basis, but I don't think that covers it all.<br />
<br />
John - and the shiner we took over Grenada (not that there weren't some egregrious abuses, just as there have been in this war) was mostly self-inflicted, because no one got across the point that *everybody* who hit the island and the surrounding waters qualified for the Expeditionary Medal.&nbsp; The initial releases and PAO responses never got around to clarifying how it all worked unitl it was too late.<br />
<br />
They're right - for *any* war we participate in, there will be mored gongs than participants, because pretty much everybody who is in the right geographic area for sufficient time will get the campaign medal.<br />
<br />
But explaining the diffrerence between awards and medals gets tedious.&nbsp; How one is for participation, and the other for doing something above and beyond just showing up and doing the usual.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/08/someone_has_bee.html#comment-91614</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/08/someone_has_bee.html#comment-91614</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 07:48:03 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from BillT on 2009-08-03</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Heh -- my &quot;severance package&quot; was my Air Medal.<br />
<br />
Valor awards for survivors of firefights were sparse in IV&nbsp;Corps after '69. Had to maintain the fiction that there were &quot;no US combat troops in the Mekong Delta&quot; yanno...<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/08/someone_has_bee.html#comment-91610</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/08/someone_has_bee.html#comment-91610</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 05:49:37 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Cannonshop on 2009-08-03</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I actually have my own nasty little hypothesis.&nbsp; It goes back to the wheelbarrowing of awards once termed the &quot;Severance Package&quot;&nbsp;for officers in Vietnam.<br />
<br />
I think they're waiting to award it to a flag-ranked officer who's a member of the ring-knocker club.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/08/someone_has_bee.html#comment-91608</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/08/someone_has_bee.html#comment-91608</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 04:43:43 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from SAJames on 2009-08-02</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Maybe I got this wrong but here is my swing at it&hellip;This is the first long term fight of our volunteer military.  Volunteers have different mindset to the job. Its what we trained for. We only are doing what we expect from everyone around us. (We hope they will.) We also have officers and senior enlisted that have the same mindset. Add into that a strange thing of having to put yourself up for awards unless the command is required to put out so many awards to look good.  Higher up the chain may not like having to give up another body for research and take statements on each Medals of Honor award put up and that maybe making its self felt below.  Some or all of this will be a factor.<br />
Please tell me I'm wrong.<br />
<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/08/someone_has_bee.html#comment-91606</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/08/someone_has_bee.html#comment-91606</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 21:52:42 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John S Allison on 2009-08-02</title>
            <description>
                Let&apos;s not forget that the military got quite a shiner over the wheelbarrow full of awards shoveled out after Grenada.  This has resulted in a goodly amount of &apos;unofficial&apos; policy that tends to downplay/grade awards when the recommender isn&apos;t one of the anointed few.  During GWI I had an 0-4 tell me that there would be no awards of any kind for our group for any reason.  We were in theater on a TDY assignment and we were supposed to be grateful for that. 
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/08/someone_has_bee.html#comment-91603</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/08/someone_has_bee.html#comment-91603</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 18:34:46 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Lamigra on 2009-08-02</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[&quot;Congressional Medal of Honor&quot;<br />
<br />
No such animal.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/08/someone_has_bee.html#comment-91600</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/08/someone_has_bee.html#comment-91600</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 16:58:20 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from sss on 2009-08-02</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[All the recent medals of honor seem to have been awarded for acts of self-sacrifice; I don't recall any being given for killing the enemy. Is it possible that reticence over the 'body-count mentality' is responsible for there being so few awards?<br />
<br />
Of course, this doesn't apply to media coverage of the enemy; we've been treated to daily reports of their 'bag' since 2001]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/08/someone_has_bee.html#comment-91597</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/08/someone_has_bee.html#comment-91597</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 16:25:38 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from wolfwalker on 2009-08-02</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I think I agree with Argent.&nbsp; I tend to associate &quot;Congressional Medal of Honor&quot; with desperate combat against enormously superior odds.&nbsp; Actions like Little Round Top, Bloody&nbsp;Ridge, Tarawa, Bastogne, Iwo Jima.&nbsp; I also associate it with individuals who stand out even in the annals of US fighting men -- Jack Lummus, who had his legs blown off by a mine on&nbsp;Iwo Jima, or Audie Murphy, who called down artillery fire on his own position to defeat a German counterattack.&nbsp; I even think that the Medals of Honor awarded to submarine captains are a little on the edge, because they didn't fight alone; they led crews of seventy or eighty men into combat.&nbsp; I never understood why the Navy would give only one individual medal for a feat that was a team effort.&nbsp; <br />
<br />
OTOH, I've read and heard of actions from Afghanistan and Iraq that sounded as desperate as any fighting in&nbsp;WW2. &nbsp;So I also wonder why there have been only a handful awarded in those wars, and all posthumously.&nbsp; <br />
<br />
The Wikipedia article on the Medal of Honor suggests that &quot;because of the intense partisan politics&quot; over these two wars, recommendations for the Medal of Honor may have been vetted much more fiercely than in the past.&nbsp; There's an unspoken implication that some possible MoH'es have been knocked down to Navy Crosses or DSCs to avoid political arguments.<br />
<br />
Is there any way to find out how many soldiers/sailors/airmen/marines have been recommended for the Medal of Honor as a result of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars?&nbsp; <br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/08/someone_has_bee.html#comment-91594</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/08/someone_has_bee.html#comment-91594</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 13:30:25 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Argent on 2009-08-02</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I also find the <br />
<blockquote>
it's a different kind of war. The enemy uses IEDs and we use Predators.
</blockquote>a bit on the nose.&nbsp; I mean it almost reeks as if this war was <em>easy</em> for the men and women who fight it.&nbsp; As though predators do all the work.&nbsp; Sure the war is different but I don't think that makes the people who have fought it any less deserving of medals.<br />
<br />
OTOH I'm not really into medal allocation by numbers and number comparisons from previous wars.&nbsp; it should be by the actual requirements of the medal.<br />
<br />
These numbers do alert us, however, into wondering what is going on upstairs.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/08/someone_has_bee.html#comment-91589</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/08/someone_has_bee.html#comment-91589</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 10:01:41 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from WS on 2009-08-02</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Heh...there have also been a lot of small unit infantry engagements in which our guys have prevailed and killed the enemy at close range against overwhelming odds and at supreme devotion and dedication. <br />
<br />
&quot;it's a different kind of war. The enemy uses IEDs and we use Predators.&quot;<br />
<br />
I am irritated by that on a number of levels.&nbsp; Statements like this totally overlook the courage and determination of our boots on the ground.&nbsp; Leaving myself out of it, my oldest son is a 19A with two deployments down range and my youngest is going into his senior year at one of our local big land grant U's.&nbsp; He'll be wearing crossed rifles too, through a ROTC&nbsp;commision.&nbsp; (Yes, I&nbsp;click on the link.)<br />
<br />
So, I&nbsp;guess my point is, and I&nbsp;am sure you will agree, this generation is no less brave or tough than their forefathers who have served our country in the past.&nbsp; They, meaning the powers that be,&nbsp; just choose not to recognize it.&nbsp; There sure seem to be a lot of BSM's out there without V's on 'em nowadays.&nbsp; Just sayin.....<br />
<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/08/someone_has_bee.html#comment-91588</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/08/someone_has_bee.html#comment-91588</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 07:50:44 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


