<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/07/ill_take_one_pl.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/07/ill_take_one_pl_atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2012://1/tag:www.thedonovan.com,2009://1.11016-</id>
  <updated>2012-03-24T15:16:38Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for I&apos;ll take one, please.</title>
  <subtitle>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.12</generator>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2009://1.11016</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/07/ill_take_one_pl.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/cgi-bin/mt41/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=11016" title="I'll take one, please." />
    <published>2009-07-13T12:56:38Z</published>
    <updated>2009-07-13T13:01:47Z</updated>
    <title>I&apos;ll take one, please.</title>
    <summary><![CDATA[Second Army Tennessee Maneuvers. 3 miles west of Watertown. As an addition to the battalion's defense, HQ Co. of the 5th Armd Maint Bn developed an idea thought up by Ordernance Sgt. Magazine. The 37mm gun is the only field weapon allotted for the battalion's defense. To increase firepower, a 50 cal. Machine gun was mounted on the front of the 37mm gun vehicle. All parts were made and mounted by HQ personnel. (6 Jun 43) Signal Corps Photo: 164-0012-43-204 (Pvt. J. F. Albert)Though, I&nbsp;gotta admit, my shins hurt just looking at the guy manning the machine gun.&nbsp; One slip...]]></summary>
    <author>
      <name>The Armorer</name>
      <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Historical Stuff" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com/">
      <![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline"><img class="mt-image-none" alt="weapons carrier1.jpg" width="600" height="484" src="http://www.thedonovan.com/images/historystuff/weapons%20carrier1.jpg" /><br /><br />Second Army Tennessee Maneuvers. 3 miles west of Watertown. As an addition to the battalion's defense, HQ Co. of the 5th Armd Maint Bn developed an idea thought up by Ordernance Sgt. Magazine. The 37mm gun is the only field weapon allotted for the battalion's defense. To increase firepower, a 50 cal. Machine gun was mounted on the front of the 37mm gun vehicle. All parts were made and mounted by HQ personnel. (6 Jun 43) Signal Corps Photo: 164-0012-43-204 (Pvt. J. F. Albert)<br /><br />Though, I&nbsp;gotta admit, my shins hurt just looking at the guy manning the machine gun.&nbsp; One slip of the foot and you're banging a shin, hard.&nbsp; Iron men, tin trucks.&nbsp; It took great brass danglies to go after tanks in one of those trucks.<br /><br />But it would be a heckuva parade vehicle for the Castle Motor Pool...&nbsp;</span>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2009://1.11016-comment:90862</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2009://1.11016" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/07/ill_take_one_pl.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/07/ill_take_one_pl.html#comment-90862" />
    <title>Comment from BillT on 2009-07-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>BillT</name>
        <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com">
        <![CDATA[The trick was to mount the 37mm so that it could fire down on the lightly-armored top or into the engine deck of the later models.. As in, putting it in an Il-2 or a Hurricane MkII.<br />
<br />
Think of the Il-2 as an anti-tank gun with wings that got shot down a lot...<br />]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-14T13:06:27Z</published>
    <updated>2009-07-14T13:06:27Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2009://1.11016-comment:90861</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2009://1.11016" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/07/ill_take_one_pl.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/07/ill_take_one_pl.html#comment-90861" />
    <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2009-07-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>John of Argghhh!</name>
        <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com">
        <![CDATA[Oh, about&nbsp;any of the Japanese and Italian&nbsp;stuff, and up through the early Pzkw IIIs, anyway.&nbsp; The 37mm in the Stuart and Lee gave good service against the lighter tanks in the desert.&nbsp; The uparmored III's, IV's, and beyond, not so good except by being much closer than the gun crew would like, and even then...]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-14T12:26:17Z</published>
    <updated>2009-07-14T12:26:17Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2009://1.11016-comment:90850</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2009://1.11016" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/07/ill_take_one_pl.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/07/ill_take_one_pl.html#comment-90850" />
    <title>Comment from Rivrdog on 2009-07-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Rivrdog</name>
        <uri>http://rivrdog.typepad.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://rivrdog.typepad.com">
        <![CDATA[Not a redleg, myself, but were there ANY Panzers which could have been stopped by a 37mm round? Since 1930 or so, that is.<br />]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-14T03:42:31Z</published>
    <updated>2009-07-14T03:42:31Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2009://1.11016-comment:90790</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2009://1.11016" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/07/ill_take_one_pl.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/07/ill_take_one_pl.html#comment-90790" />
    <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2009-07-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>John of Argghhh!</name>
        <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com">
        <![CDATA[Wolfwalker - 6 June, 1943 is what the caption says.&nbsp; And yes, there is little that is practical about that .50 cal mount.<br />
<br />
Og - there is a guy who makes repro 37mm with mounts for this installation.&nbsp; The front end wouldn't have been hard to fabricate, either.<br />
<br />
Boq - gee, thanks for that...&nbsp; not.]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-13T14:37:18Z</published>
    <updated>2009-07-13T14:37:18Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2009://1.11016-comment:90789</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2009://1.11016" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/07/ill_take_one_pl.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/07/ill_take_one_pl.html#comment-90789" />
    <title>Comment from Boquisucio on 2009-07-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Boquisucio</name>
        
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[Ho you mean like <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/30540327@N03/3717111804/" rel="nofollow"><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255);"><strong>THIS</strong></span></a>?<br />]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-13T14:33:09Z</published>
    <updated>2009-07-13T14:33:09Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2009://1.11016-comment:90788</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2009://1.11016" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/07/ill_take_one_pl.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/07/ill_take_one_pl.html#comment-90788" />
    <title>Comment from og on 2009-07-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>og</name>
        <uri>http://www.neanderpundit.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.neanderpundit.com">
        <![CDATA[Totally sweet. I want two, one for myself and one for the oglet. <br />
<br />
Woulda been a good whatsis, because it woulda been impossible to attribute.]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-13T14:32:34Z</published>
    <updated>2009-07-13T14:32:34Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2009://1.11016-comment:90787</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2009://1.11016" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/07/ill_take_one_pl.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/07/ill_take_one_pl.html#comment-90787" />
    <title>Comment from wolfwalker on 2009-07-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>wolfwalker</name>
        
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[How old is this picture?&nbsp; It looks like something from around WW2.&nbsp; It also looks like a makeshift AA gun.&nbsp; Wouldn't that high-angle mounting make the fifty-cal useless against ground targets?<br />]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-13T14:23:17Z</published>
    <updated>2009-07-13T14:23:17Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
</feed>


