<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for Today&apos;s Medal of Honor Moment for 27 June</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/06/todays_medal_of_43.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/06/todays_medal_of_43_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:17:24 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>Today&apos;s Medal of Honor Moment for 27 June</title>
            <description><![CDATA[As per usual, we open with the Civil War.Gaines Mill, 1862.Brigadier General Daniel Butterfield, in addition to being a hero, affects all of us with a military connection today.&nbsp; He gave us Taps.&nbsp; He's also unusual in that he was a general officer when he earned his Medal.&nbsp; While not so true for the Civil War, and even up through the Spanish American War, Generals don't often find themselves in a position to display the personal level of heroism usually attendant to the Medal of Honor.&nbsp; At least, they shouldn't, if they're doing their jobs right.This was the third&nbsp;battle of...]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/06/todays_medal_of_43.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/06/todays_medal_of_43.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 08:44:22 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2009-06-29</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Well, Windy - seeing as how he didn't get the award until 1892, the question had been settled... oh, wait.&nbsp; The Ghost of Ripley didn't die until the adoption of the M16.<br />
<br />
Never mind.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/06/todays_medal_of_43.html#comment-90179</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/06/todays_medal_of_43.html#comment-90179</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:36:21 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Windy Wilson on 2009-06-29</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[&quot;and by his rapid firing&quot;.<br />
Well, if the offical certificate mentioned an ordinary soldier using the repeating Henry to an effect good enough to win him a Medal of Honor, the powers that be might have to reconsider the idea that soldiers with repeating rifles would only waste ammo. Better to leave that part out of it and make your ordinary soldiers think the rapid fire was with a springfield muzzle-loading musket. That'll make them practice with motivation!<br />
<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/06/todays_medal_of_43.html#comment-90178</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/06/todays_medal_of_43.html#comment-90178</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:50:00 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2009-06-29</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Okay - while no date of birth is given, it's strongly suggested that he was born late in 1844 and he enlisted at the beginning of the war in 1861, and the reason he was enlisted as a drummer is because of his age.<br />
<br />
So, while everybody is correct, the cite as listed in the book is a touch misleading.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/06/todays_medal_of_43.html#comment-90155</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/06/todays_medal_of_43.html#comment-90155</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 07:28:57 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2009-06-29</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Vitae - aside from what Bill said, the data comes from the only official US&nbsp;source (the Senate records) on the Medal - and the repository for that data has a disclaimer on it about the inaccuracies, especially in the pre Span-Am War citations that are beyond checking (or no one wants to spend the time trying to track it down).&nbsp; Truth to tell, I didn't even do the math - but I'm gratified to know *someone* reads this stuff!&nbsp; I'll poke around, there might be a story that goes with it that I can add to the post.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/06/todays_medal_of_43.html#comment-90153</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/06/todays_medal_of_43.html#comment-90153</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 07:22:04 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from BillT on 2009-06-29</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Good catch. <br />
<br />
Of course, it could also have been a case of fibbing about his age in order to enlist, like great-grandpa on my Dad's side did. Little rapscallion turned fifteen two days before he drummed at Shiloh.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/06/todays_medal_of_43.html#comment-90148</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/06/todays_medal_of_43.html#comment-90148</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 04:08:27 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Vitae Drinker on 2009-06-29</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<br />
Based on these dates...(and maybe my math is a little fuzzy) But, wouldn't he have been 18 at the time of the battle, not 16?&nbsp;Maybe 16 when we joined up. (emphasis mine)<br />
<blockquote>
SIDMAN, GEORGE E.<br />
<br />
Rank and organization: Private, Company C, 16th Michigan Infantry. Place and date: At Gaines Mill, Va., <strong>27 June 1862</strong>. Entered service at: Owosso, Mich. Born: <strong>25 November 1844</strong>, Rochester, N.Y. Date of issue: 6 April 1892. Citation: Distinguished bravery in battle. Rallied his comrades to charge vastly superior force until wounded in the hip. <em>He was a 16_year_old drummer.</em>
</blockquote>
&nbsp;

&nbsp;

&nbsp;]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/06/todays_medal_of_43.html#comment-90144</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/06/todays_medal_of_43.html#comment-90144</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 02:06:59 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


