<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for While I notionally lament the loss of newspapers as they existed in myth...</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/04/while_i_notiona.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/04/while_i_notiona_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:20:41 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>While I notionally lament the loss of newspapers as they existed in myth...</title>
            <description><![CDATA[...I&nbsp;can't help but be tickled by the feather of schadenfreude with this confluence of stories...

Shamelessly stolen from NRO's John MIller in The Corner on this lazy Saturday:

NYT editorial, Dec. 28, 2008:

The argument against unions &mdash; that they unduly burden employers with unreasonable demands &mdash; is one that corporate America makes in good times and bad, so the recession by itself is not an excuse to avoid pushing the [card-check] bill next year. The real issue is whether enhanced unionizing would worsen the recession, and there is no evidence that it would.

There is a strong argument that the slack labor market of a recession actually makes unions all the more important. Without a united front, workers will have even less bargaining power in the recession than they had during the growth years of this decade, when they largely failed to get raises even as productivity and profits soared. If pay continues to lag, it will only prolong the downturn by inhibiting spending.

Wash Post, today:

In a striking example of corporate hardball, the New York Times Co. has threatened to shut down one of its journalistic jewels, the Boston Globe, unless the New England paper's unions agree to sweeping concessions.
&nbsp;
Giggle.﻿]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/04/while_i_notiona.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/04/while_i_notiona.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 10:55:52 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Josh on 2009-04-09</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[[insert Demotivator poster]<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.samuelscomputer.com/Files/LIBERALSdemotivator.jpg" rel="nofollow">Done.</a><br />
<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/04/while_i_notiona.html#comment-87025</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/04/while_i_notiona.html#comment-87025</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 07:41:12 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from totwtytr on 2009-04-05</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Even before the Times Corp. bought the Globe, they were known for such hypocrisy. Unions were good for every other business, but not them. I console myself by thinking of all the trees that will be saved when the Globe and other newspapers go the way of the buggy whip. <br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/04/while_i_notiona.html#comment-86793</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/04/while_i_notiona.html#comment-86793</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 06:56:33 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Maggie on 2009-04-04</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I will miss the Globe if they fold because they have the best Red Sox coverage.&nbsp; That's the only thing I'd miss.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/04/while_i_notiona.html#comment-86780</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/04/while_i_notiona.html#comment-86780</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 14:10:35 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from BillT on 2009-04-04</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[From the NYT article: <em>If pay continues to lag, it will only prolong the downturn by inhibiting spending.</em><br />
<br />
From the WaPo article: <em>The Times newspaper said last week that it is laying off 100 employees and cutting the salaries of most of those who remain by as much as 5 percent this year.</em><br />
<br />
[insert Demotivator poster] <br />
&nbsp;
<strong>Liberals</strong>: <br />
Doing their bit to prolong the downturn.
<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/04/while_i_notiona.html#comment-86778</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/04/while_i_notiona.html#comment-86778</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 13:42:00 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from BillT on 2009-04-04</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[For *shame*, John, expressing delight at the <strike>blatant hypocritical turnaround</strike> troubles currently experienced by that <strike>moonbatic consortium</strike> stalwart defender of <strike>gloriously triumphant socialism</strike> your rights under the First, Second and Fourth Amend<br />
<br />
Oh. The *<em>New York</em>* <em>Times</em>.<br />
<br />
Disregard.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/04/while_i_notiona.html#comment-86776</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/04/while_i_notiona.html#comment-86776</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 13:23:08 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Positroll on 2009-04-04</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[O.k., I know I'm late, but here's a few (older) links re: Canadian tanks: Canadian Army Journal: &quot;LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE USE OF TANKS IN ROTO 4&quot; <a href="http://www.army.forces.gc.ca/caj/documents/vol_11/iss_2/CAJ_Vol11.2_05_e.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.army.forces.gc.ca/caj/documents/vol_11/iss_2/CAJ_Vol11.2_05_e.pdf</a> Lots of pics, too ...(sorry if already posted ...) Also: <a href="http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/tanks-for-the-lesson-leopards-too-for-canada-03208/" rel="nofollow">http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/tanks-for-the-lesson-leopards-too-for-canada-03208/</a> and &quot;Though an former Army guy, I was not a tanker (though they scared the crap out of me when I operated near them on foot) - and it strikes me that this crap-scaring is a major part of why they are useful. Picture yourself as a Taliban fighter holded up in a thick walled Afgan compound. Your guys are pretty well armed - rifles, machineguns and Rocket Propelled Grenades. The Canadians are attacking you - basically infantry with some LAV-IIIs in support. The Canadians are good, but you've got enough firepower to make them pay for the ground they take - the LAVs have to be kept fairly far back for fear of RPGs. Now picture this massive steel monster enters the picture. Its 1500hp deisel motor is literally making the ground vibrate - the walls are shaking and throwing off dust. It can sit out front and take a hit from anything you can throw at it - sure you might hit a track or disable a sight with a very lucky RPG shot, but the guys inside are safe. So it can sit there for as long as it takes the crew to use their very advanced thermal sights to pick off your guys one by one (or in bigger lots if they use the main gun - which is effective at over 3km range). That is a serious morale killer for you - and a huge boost for the Canadian infantry. Seems like it is worth the cost in dollars to me - certainly in infantry lives saved. Afstan is not a tank war - there will be no great Rommel style flanking movements. Rather, this is a classic case of using tanks in direct support of the infantry, something that the US Army sort of forgot about during the Cold War on the focus on the Fulda Gap - fortunately the Canadian Army and the US Marine Crops didn't.&quot; <a href="http://communities.canada.com/ottawacitizen/blogs/defencewatch/archive/2008/02/26/german-military-impressed-with-cf-afghan-tank-operations.aspx#comments" rel="nofollow">http://communities.canada.com/ottawacitizen/blogs/defencewatch/archive/2008/02/26/german-military-impressed-with-cf-afghan-tank-operations.aspx#comments</a> Finally <a href="http://www.monstersandcritics.com/news/southasia/news/article_1420773.php/Afghanistan_fight_boosts_role_for_tanks_in_21st_century__Feature_" rel="nofollow">http://www.monstersandcritics.com/news/southasia/news/article_1420773.php/Afghanistan_fight_boosts_role_for_tanks_in_21st_century__Feature_</a> Enough for a new post on tanks ? ;-)]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/04/while_i_notiona.html#comment-86774</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/04/while_i_notiona.html#comment-86774</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 12:56:34 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Flag Gazer on 2009-04-04</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[ROFL!&nbsp; I get great joy in things like this - I know shame on me! <br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/04/while_i_notiona.html#comment-86769</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/04/while_i_notiona.html#comment-86769</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 12:27:01 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


