<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/04/2010_quadrennia.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/04/2010_quadrennia_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:19:39 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>2010 Quadrennial Defense Review</title>
            <description><![CDATA[This is the activity that translates the National Defense Strategy into policy and actions.&nbsp; This is the framework for this go-round.The 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) is a legislatively-mandated (USC 10, Sec. 118 (a)) review of Department of Defense (DoD) strategy and priorities. DoD is preparing now to conduct this review, which takes place every four years and will be provided to Congress in early 2010.US Department of Defense2010 QDR Terms of Reference Fact SheetApril 27, 2009 The QDR will assess the threats and challenges the nation faces and re-balance DoD&rsquo;sstrategies, capabilities and forces to address today&rsquo;s conflicts and tomorrow&rsquo;s...]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/04/2010_quadrennia.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/04/2010_quadrennia.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:11:46 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2009-04-30</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<p>J(NOTA)&nbsp;- I don't think we'll see an end-strength cut.&nbsp; Program cuts out the wazoo, but, frankly, some of them are overdue.<br />
<br />
The question is which programs, and how deep, and with some, like FCS, do we throw the baby out with the bathwater?<br />
<br />
&nbsp;</p>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/04/2010_quadrennia.html#comment-88134</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/04/2010_quadrennia.html#comment-88134</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:12:19 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John (not the armorer) on 2009-04-30</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I&nbsp;fear for the results, and their lasting impact, of a QDR done by the current administration.<br />
<br />
It is truly scary that we do a months long QDR analysis process, which will undoubtedly result in huge cuts in programs, hardware, end strength and mission readiness and capability for the present and future.&nbsp; At the same time, Congress passes unaffordable spending bills of unprecedented scope in a matter of hours with not a single member even reading what they were voting on.&nbsp; Are they fools or traitors?&nbsp; Or both?<br />
<br />
This administration is only 100 days into the ruination of our nation.&nbsp; God only knows what further damage they can inflict in the remainder of their terms in office.<br />
<br />
Historians will look back and wonder how our citizens allowed this great calamity to take place.<br />
<br />
We are so screwed.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/04/2010_quadrennia.html#comment-88126</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/04/2010_quadrennia.html#comment-88126</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:40:43 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


