<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for VA Third Party Insurers update from the VFW</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/va_third_party.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/va_third_party_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:21:27 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>VA Third Party Insurers update from the VFW</title>
            <description> Bottom line - they raise some of the issues you guys raised.  As I said - the devil is in the details.  One thing is probably certain - someone will get screwed from some direction.  And that is usually the ones who can least afford it.

That said - I think it&apos;s perfectly okay to look at the idea, poke and prod it, etc.  Take a look at how it&apos;s been working with TRICARE and Medicare, which apparently has a similar provision.  I don&apos;t fault &apos;em for pushing the envelope.  That&apos;s just *your* incentive to spend a little money in support of the veteran&apos;s organizations who are going to carry our water in this discussion.

You don&apos;t have to think it&apos;s fair - but it is the environment in which we currently operate.  And a reminder - on issues like this, it is not the Agency nor the President that is your friend.  It&apos;s Congress.  I say that because an awful lot of us have a default position, from decades of service, of not realizing our interests align differently depending on the issue.  Details below the fold.
</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/va_third_party.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/va_third_party.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 12:11:53 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2009-03-17</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[One reason I work for the company I did was that they *explicitly* didn't factor your retirement pay into their salary offer.<br />
<br />
Three other offers I got did.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/va_third_party.html#comment-85867</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/va_third_party.html#comment-85867</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:11:54 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Cricket on 2009-03-17</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[*Some* employers already do look at pensions veterans get as a way to offset their salaries.&nbsp; I don't see that health care would be any different.&nbsp; The employer already pays taxes; he is being billed twice.<br />
<br />
Maybe Obama should do like he said he was going to do:&nbsp; Not spend more money than government takes in.&nbsp; Of course he said that after signing the Pork Bill.<br />
<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/va_third_party.html#comment-85864</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/va_third_party.html#comment-85864</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 19:35:50 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Grumpy on 2009-03-14</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I read your admonition to me, *chill out!* You didn't put it that way, but it was the right thing to say at the time to me. &nbsp;I figure. I'll wait until they actually, start spelling things out. Everything I saw from the hearings was mere speculation. Politicians, from either party, they BOTH&nbsp;do it, they'll take a controversial idea and float it, into view. If they get no negative response, it then becomes policy.<br />
<br />
But you really make a good point about two things, contact and financial support to the VSO's. The whole bit about &quot;Other Health Insurance&quot;, raises a whole host of issues. All of these costs should be placed under the cost of war. &nbsp;This would include past and present, done. THANKS!<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/va_third_party.html#comment-85742</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/va_third_party.html#comment-85742</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 18:30:52 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


