<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for The new White House Afstan/Pakistan policy.</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/the_new_white_h.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/the_new_white_h_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 16:56:52 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>The new White House Afstan/Pakistan policy.</title>
            <description>From the speech:Our troops have fought bravely against a ruthless enemy. Our civilians have made great sacrifices. Our allies have borne a heavy burden. Afghans have suffered and sacrificed for their future. But for six years, Afghanistan has been denied the resources that it demands because of the war in Iraq. Now, we must make a commitment that can accomplish our goals. I&apos;ve already ordered the deployment of 17,000 troops that had been requested by General McKiernan for many months. These soldiers and Marines will take the fight to the Taliban in the south and the east, and give us...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/the_new_white_h.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/the_new_white_h.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 07:56:14 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Grumpy on 2009-03-27</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[John, as I read this, I was thinking of a program on C-Span, if fact, you can watch it online. &nbsp;It is in their video library. You can also link it from the &quot;Combined Arms Center&quot; website. The title, &quot;Understanding the US&nbsp;Army's Field Manual 3-07&quot;. This is on Stability Operations.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://usacac.army.mil/cac2/index.asp" rel="nofollow">http://usacac.army.mil/cac2/index.asp</a><br />
<br />
Now, my suggestion is *invest* some time and read/watch both this and Obama's plans for both A'stan and P'stan. I admit, it can be confusing. &quot;Can there be a method to this madness?&quot; I believe there is a very good plan hidden here. It all depends on how does POTUS look at it in an applied sense, not a just theoretical viewpoint.&nbsp;<br />
<br />
LTG&nbsp;William Caldwell is involved, to me both were well worth the time.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/the_new_white_h.html#comment-86416</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/the_new_white_h.html#comment-86416</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:12:15 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Colin on 2009-03-27</title>
            <description>
                I don&apos;t know, it the parts of the speech I heard all seemed a repackaging of everything I have heard before. I also think that Afghanistan is a bit like the Italian Front in late WWII, everything went to Iraq (D-Day and beyond) now that that war has wound down, troops and equipment can focus in Afghanistan, which is a good thing because the Canadian Forces is wearing out as well, as I suspect some of the other smaller nations forces are. The biggest problem I see is how to support extra troops there, with the main supply line under daily threat and the secondaries being long and slow, I can see operation tempo being restricted at times.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/the_new_white_h.html#comment-86400</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/the_new_white_h.html#comment-86400</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:59:48 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2009-03-27</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Indeed.&nbsp; That matches my own information from, *koff* impeccable, albeit pedestrian, sources.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/the_new_white_h.html#comment-86385</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/the_new_white_h.html#comment-86385</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:23:44 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from DJ Elliott on 2009-03-27</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Word that 4/82 BCT was going to Afghan was already out in the first week of this month.&nbsp; <br />
<br />
Part of the two BCT equivalents diverted from Iraq.&nbsp; The other being the USMC MEB built out of diverted elements originally scheduled for Iraq.<br />
<br />
The remaining numbers to make it 4,000 is the 82nd's Div HQ.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/the_new_white_h.html#comment-86377</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/the_new_white_h.html#comment-86377</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:52:56 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>

