<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for The End of Stop Loss</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/the_end_of_stop.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/the_end_of_stop_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:21:09 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>The End of Stop Loss</title>
            <description>Secretary Gates announced the Army was ending its use of the Stop Loss authority this year.

So, I took an hour of vacation today and spent it with the Army G1, LTG Michael Rochelle, MG Gina Farrisee, Director, Military Personnel Management and a host of lesser luminaries of the MSM and Blog press.

I&apos;m going to make this short and sweet.</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/the_end_of_stop.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/the_end_of_stop.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:17:26 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2009-03-19</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Hey, it was only 914 words for a complex subject that I had to impress everybody with my mastery of so that my ego would be appropriately engorged.<br />
<br />
What's your point?<br />
<br />
[sits back with popcorn to see where *this* goes]]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/the_end_of_stop.html#comment-86017</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/the_end_of_stop.html#comment-86017</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:30:05 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from DL Sly on 2009-03-19</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<em>&quot;I'm going to make this short and sweet.&quot;</em><br />
<br />
Whew!&nbsp; I'm glad.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
I&nbsp;can only imagine how many pixels it would take for *long and bitter*....<br />
*s<em>nnn</em>ort*<br />
0&gt;:~}]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/the_end_of_stop.html#comment-85992</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/the_end_of_stop.html#comment-85992</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 10:47:27 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Cannonshop on 2009-03-19</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[CJ, it's not that, it's an extra five hundered bucks so that when they get home,&nbsp; and Tricare dumps them on the Insurance system, they can fall behind on the payments slower.&nbsp; ('cause, y'know, that's what DoD's going to do now, instead of honouring the prior commitment to Veteran care going back to the civil war.)<br />
<br />
Five hundered a month is about 150 bucks less than coverage under COBRA costs for laid off employees who need to keep their Health Insurance while they're looking for work-and that's cheaper than private insurance for unemployed vets who're too physically screwed up to find a job that pays a living wage AND has health care bennies.<br />
<br />
So...you're right-it's a disgrace.&nbsp; You're just wrong about HOW.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/the_end_of_stop.html#comment-85972</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/the_end_of_stop.html#comment-85972</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 02:09:55 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from CJ on 2009-03-18</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I can't believe we're still paying &quot;stop lossed&quot;&nbsp;Soldiers $500 to meet their 8-year contractual obligations they signed on for.&nbsp; I understand paying troops who have completed their 8 years of active and IRR&nbsp;time getting the money if they are stop-lossed, but not those with fewer than 8 years.&nbsp; It's just a waste of money going to people who voluntarily signed the damn paper!&nbsp; It's that entitlement mentality?&nbsp; Will the $500 make them less pissed off?&nbsp; Will they start singing our tune and encouraging others to sign up?&nbsp; Hell no! <br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/the_end_of_stop.html#comment-85970</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/the_end_of_stop.html#comment-85970</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:38:38 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2009-03-18</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I don't see why the payments should be suspended, Mike.&nbsp; The Congress has already appropriated $73M for the outlay, not authorized and appropriated, so the wickets have been jumped for the Army to start making the payments.<br />
<br />
Don't confuse the $500 per month Stop Loss payment with the as-yet un-determined incentive payments for people to extend their enlistments.<br />
<br />
Now, if you mean a re-institution of Stop Loss... different animal.&nbsp; Like I said in the post - we're one crisis in the world (Mexico, anyone?) away from reimposing Stop Loss.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/the_end_of_stop.html#comment-85945</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/the_end_of_stop.html#comment-85945</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:50:19 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from RetRsvMike on 2009-03-18</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[dang!&nbsp; and i held back from offering the opinion that it might have been caused by hitting end-strength target early!<br />
<br />
makes good sense....<br />
<br />
(now lets just watch how long that $500 offer holds out before it gets suspended)<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/the_end_of_stop.html#comment-85944</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/the_end_of_stop.html#comment-85944</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:21:39 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


