<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for On the issue of Dover, and privacy.</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/on_the_issue_of_2.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/on_the_issue_of_2_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:21:17 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>On the issue of Dover, and privacy.</title>
            <description><![CDATA[That David of Thunder Run mentioned here today.

I stand beside Army wife and author&nbsp;Lily Burana on this.

And I love this paragraph.&nbsp; It's my mom, and my wife.&nbsp; And Cassandra, and Greta, and Cricket, and Carrie, and Sarah, and... well the list is endless, really.&nbsp; And I can't leave out Maggie, and Fuzzybee, and Maryann, either.



One acquaintance, favoring privacy, said that if the worst were to happen to her husband and someone wielding a camera dared to elbow in on her family's grief, she'd &quot;open up a can of Army wife whoop-ass.&quot; The image of the modern military spouse is half-frontier wife, half-Care Bear -- by turns stoically able and cooingly comforting. But when it comes to acting on behalf of our kin and the larger military family, make no mistake: Wives are warriors too.

They also serve, who stand and wait.]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/on_the_issue_of_2.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/on_the_issue_of_2.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:58:08 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2009-03-19</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<p>Carrie - you *so* don't get to make that determination.<br />
<br />
The external actors do.<br />
<br />
This is a People's Choice award, so there.<br />
<br />
So, as I said to Cassie - Pish tosh, womyn!</p>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/on_the_issue_of_2.html#comment-85984</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/on_the_issue_of_2.html#comment-85984</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:43:18 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Marine Baggage on 2009-03-19</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Thanks for the kind words, John.. but I'm with Cass on this.<br />
I'm not deserving of such praise but I have seen so many spouses who most definitely are.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/on_the_issue_of_2.html#comment-85983</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/on_the_issue_of_2.html#comment-85983</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:21:13 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Maggie on 2009-03-18</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I don't necessarily disagree with her. I just think it's a parallel discussion. <br />
<br />
Dover will not affect individual families so much as those who currently are involved at Dover (or will be). <br />
<br />
Her premise is that a government policy can't cover all the contingencies of what a particular service member's family would want. She's right. Mil-spouses come in every possible stripe. <br />
<br />
But that's not what Dover is about. <br />
<br />
Personally I think the media is framing the discussion this way on purpose. If you ask the people who are really affected.....they want it left alone.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/on_the_issue_of_2.html#comment-85946</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/on_the_issue_of_2.html#comment-85946</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:49:46 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from htom on 2009-03-18</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Hey, Press? I gotta clue for you.&nbsp; Most grownups don't think it's a good plan to pick a fight with a bunch of Marines. You know who the smart Marines don't pick fights with? Military Moms. We know where the losing battles are.&nbsp; (Was it Lewis or Clark who said) &quot;...Mr. Grizzly then declined the combat.&quot;&nbsp; Ms Bear, she's just a gal what won't say no. You do not want to cross, you do not even want to <em>meet </em>Ms. Angry Grizzly Bear. I'd sooner fight her than a Military Mom. <br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/on_the_issue_of_2.html#comment-85932</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/on_the_issue_of_2.html#comment-85932</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:31:17 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2009-03-18</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Oh, pish-tosh woman.&nbsp; You're as bad as I am at that self-effacing carp.<br />
<br />
8^&nbsp;)]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/on_the_issue_of_2.html#comment-85930</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/on_the_issue_of_2.html#comment-85930</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:57:23 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Cassandra on 2009-03-18</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[You did marry a good 'un, John :)<br />
<br />
Thanks for the kind words. In my case they're undeserved, but nonetheless appreciated.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/on_the_issue_of_2.html#comment-85929</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/on_the_issue_of_2.html#comment-85929</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:54:08 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


