<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for On the issue of VA billing private insurers for care, when available.</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/on_the_issue_of_1.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/on_the_issue_of_1_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:21:20 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>On the issue of VA billing private insurers for care, when available.</title>
            <description><![CDATA[As a lifelong recipient of government health care, I've been educated this last&nbsp;week or so&nbsp;on many of the nuances of private health care that were undiscovered country to me.

And, I suspect,&nbsp;new territory to&nbsp;many of the government people who were involved in floating the idea that Secretary Shinseki mentioned to Congress.

I&nbsp;bet Secretary Shinseki missed a bunch of the nuances, too - being a&nbsp;member of the same health care system I am.&nbsp; I rather suspect his education has been rather more brutal and direct than mine.&nbsp; Most of ya just treated me like a kid who rides the short bus and can't help himself when he drools on his shirt.]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/on_the_issue_of_1.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/on_the_issue_of_1.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:46:02 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2009-03-18</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I'm not sure I understand your point, Mike.<br />
<br />
Those of us above 50% are entitled to full coverage, but everybody with a rated injury is entitled to coverage for service-connected issues.<br />
<br />
Or have I missed an eligibility change?]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/on_the_issue_of_1.html#comment-85893</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/on_the_issue_of_1.html#comment-85893</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 08:07:40 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from RetRsvMike on 2009-03-18</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[&quot;The VA&nbsp;doesn't require the service connected Vets to have health insurance.&quot;<br />
<br />
it sure seems as if they do if your rating is below 50%.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/on_the_issue_of_1.html#comment-85890</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/on_the_issue_of_1.html#comment-85890</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 07:15:05 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Grumpy on 2009-03-17</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[There are no easy answers. Part of the problem has to do with the time frame of your military service. The question becomes, &quot;Were you drafted and then wounded or disabled in the Military?&quot; I just can not see charging the health insurance for the care of a service connected disabled Military Veteran. It won't take long before the insurance rates for the Veterans to explode. John, I will echo you and say, &quot;The VA &nbsp;doesn't require the service connected Vets to have health insurance.&quot; &nbsp;In my view, this should be a part of the cost of war.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/on_the_issue_of_1.html#comment-85859</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/on_the_issue_of_1.html#comment-85859</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:32:18 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from SSG Jeff (USAR) on 2009-03-17</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I wouldn't think this idea would be a problem - except for one point that the American Legion makes that I consider very, very appropriate - most private health insurance comes with a lifetime &quot;cap&quot; on benefits - after it's paid out X many dollars, that's it. <br />
<br />
This plan could do that when applied to a seriously injured Soldier or Veteran. <br />
<br />
That's why this is a bad ida.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/on_the_issue_of_1.html#comment-85855</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/on_the_issue_of_1.html#comment-85855</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:26:51 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from RetRsvMike on 2009-03-17</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[..and this is the one Federal system of healthcare where the recipients aren't about to back down and kowtow to the higher knowledge of their elected representatives...&nbsp; cranky vets tend to speak their minds.<br />
<br />
so you can just imagine what kind of monkeyshines THEY would be getting up to in implementing a mandatory healthcare system for the hoi polloi.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/on_the_issue_of_1.html#comment-85853</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/on_the_issue_of_1.html#comment-85853</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:48:30 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from JamesLee on 2009-03-17</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[While I don't pretend to understand a lot of the issue, I do think it's telling that the Commander of the American Legion&nbsp;David Rehbein was &quot;clearly angry&quot; after meeting with President Obama on this issue.<br />
<br />
That said, I&nbsp;hope the President tries to push this, and that there is a nasty fight in Congress over it.&nbsp; Expose it, and give it airtime.&nbsp; Then everyone will see.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/on_the_issue_of_1.html#comment-85846</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/on_the_issue_of_1.html#comment-85846</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:29:06 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


