<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for Diversions...</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/diversions.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/diversions_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 16:59:14 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>Diversions...</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Greyhawk sent a note a couple of days ago about a post he put up&nbsp;- here's the lead-in from the email:

Greetings, Greyhawk here.
&nbsp;
It's been a while since I've had something this significant to report, but I'm not sure the significance will be obvious to non-milbloggers. 

If you take a Brigade sceduled to go to Iraq and schedule it to go to Afghanistan instead, then make headlines for drawing down Iraq and building up Afghanistan, could you pull off substituting another Brigade into the Iraq rotation for the one you diverted without anyone in the media pointing out that your drawdown is a scam, a hoax on the American public? 

Of course you can. (Well, you and I can't. And George Bush probably couldn't. But Barack Obama can. After all, &quot;yes we can&quot; is his motto, right?) 

And yes he did.

You should click that link and read his whole post, but I'm going to stick he recap in here, with the 'Hawk's permission:]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/diversions.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/diversions.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 07:49:54 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Damian on 2009-03-11</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I'm concerned that what looked to be an impressive national security staff allowed purely political considerations to trump real-life capabilities, and couldn't persuade Obama not to reach way down to pick which units would go where - a decison that should be left purely to the military.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/diversions.html#comment-85548</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/diversions.html#comment-85548</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:02:52 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Grimmy on 2009-03-10</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[The Iraq delployment was most likely scheduled to be in a built up, urban area. The Afghan deployment will, most likely, be in rural. <br />
<br />
Battle skills tend to be transferable from one AO to another with any needful fine adjustments picked up on the job. But the &quot;who to know&quot;, map studies, logistics preload, and language study tend to be AO specific.<br />
<br />
I suspect that some of the mullahs will speak Arabic, since Arabic is the religious language of islam, but no clue how much of the general population speaks it.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.ethnologue.com/show_country.asp?name=Afghanistan" rel="nofollow">www.ethnologue.com/show_country.asp</a><br />
<br />
But, what this is about is disingenuous slight of handing. Another indicator that this current admin has no intention of being forthright or honest about anything it does. Image uber alles. Substance be damned.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/diversions.html#comment-85523</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/diversions.html#comment-85523</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:50:17 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from FbL on 2009-03-10</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[AFSis, an interesting question might be: &quot;How transferrable is the training between Iraq and Afghanistan?&quot;&nbsp; Or &quot;Does the training emphasize skills that can be flexibly applied across a variety of battlefields/deployments, or is it very specific to wherever the unit is headed?&quot;<br />
<br />
<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/diversions.html#comment-85507</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/diversions.html#comment-85507</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:28:49 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from AFSister on 2009-03-10</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[There's another Blogger's Round Table discussion tomorrow, with the topic being pre-deployment training.<br />
I've been told that, if brought up, this topic may not be answered by the guest, as it is out of his hands.&nbsp; I understand that, but I still think it warrants an official answer from either the DoD or the Army.<br />
<br />
And no, I won't be bringing it up myself (I've completely lost my voice and am operating as a deaf person right now.&nbsp; very interesting... annoying, but interesting), but I personally believe it will come up.&nbsp; We shall see.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/diversions.html#comment-85501</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/diversions.html#comment-85501</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:50:53 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from RetRsvMike on 2009-03-10</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[fiddlin' with the TPFDL again....<br />
<br />
of course, the mil sourcing officer is the one who appears to be the one left holding the bag, but it need not occur if those higher had the intestinal fortitude to damn well ensure that a valid plan with a valid sequencing of valid units with specific capabilities is all lined up.<br />
<br />
granted, plans change.&nbsp; deal with it.&nbsp; (but why the need to change the plan just for the sake of changing the plan??)<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/diversions.html#comment-85500</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/diversions.html#comment-85500</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:06:37 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Josh on 2009-03-10</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Can we just fire him now?&nbsp; Tell him that he's convinced us about the recession, so we're going to need to have some layoffs?<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/diversions.html#comment-85499</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/diversions.html#comment-85499</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:42:27 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from AFSister on 2009-03-10</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[This is just one of many uninformed, impulsive, and erratic moves our new CinC will make over the next few years.&nbsp; These guys have spent a LONG time gearing up for Iraq, including language classes that are now pretty much useless.&nbsp; They've prepared themselves for a peacekeeping, urban mission, and now they're being thrown into the tribal, violent, mountainous regions of A-stan.&nbsp; It's a recipe for disaster, and it lies squarely on O's shoulders.&nbsp; If he's gonna play war, he'd better be prepared to accept and take responsibility for his actions.<br />
<br />
hoser.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/diversions.html#comment-85497</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2009/03/diversions.html#comment-85497</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:52:23 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>

