previous post next post  

Further proof this is *not* your father's war...

Bemusing press release.  Leaving aside the painful way these things are written...


KABUL, Afghanistan – Afghan National Police and Coalition forces killed three armed militants and detained five suspected militants, including the targeted individual during an operation to disrupt the al-Qaeda terrorist network in Khost province, Tuesday.

The combined operation in Khost District, located approximately 150 km southeast of Kabul, netted an al-Qaeda liaison believed to facilitate the movement of foreign fighters into Afghanistan to conduct terrorist activities. The detained al-Qaeda liaison is believed to be in direct contact with al-Qaeda leaders, outside of Afghanistan, coordinating activities aimed at destabilizing the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan and harming innocent civilians and Coalition forces.

During the operation, the combined force encountered one militant armed with an AK-47 assault rifle who attempted to engage the force. The combined force engaged the militant with small-arms and killed him.

Additionally, three militants, two armed with AK-47s and one with a shotgun, attempted to maneuver on and engaged the combined force as they searched the compound. The combined force returned fire killing two militants and wounding the third, which was later revealed to be a female.

Medical personnel on site provided immediate care to the wounded female militant and evacuated her to a Coalition forces’ hospital for further care. Respecting cultural sensitivities, the combined force allowed the female militant’s husband to accompany her to the hospital. She is expected to recover.

A search of the compound revealed multiple AK-47s, hand grenades, pistols, one shotgun and other military equipment.

“The ANP and coalition elements had cordoned off the area and the militants were asked to surrender, but refused and a gun fight erupted,” said Col. Gregory Julian, U.S. Forces Afghanistan spokesperson.
Medical personnel on site provided immediate care to the wounded female militant and evacuated her to a Coalition forces’ hospital for further care. Respecting cultural sensitivities, the combined force allowed the female militant’s husband to accompany her to the hospital. She is expected to recover.

Huh.  21st Century Warfare.

12 Comments

Shame about that "expected to recover" bit- they need to work on their marksmanship.
 
It's not their fault...they're saddled with a round barely passable for anti-personnel use under ideal conditions, which depends entirely on high velocity and yet is never developing that velocity in the first place because it's being fired out of extra-short barrels.  Send them out there with 10-gauge magnum shotguns firing flechette rounds and I don't think there will be anybody living long enough to ask for medical attention...
 
We're going to kill our way out of this?  SOmeone hasn't been doing the required reading.  Sigh.

You're killing ideas and propaganda as much as you are the fighters.  This isn't going up against the Russian Bear---where killing every mother's son is appropriate given the ratehr conventional nature.
 
You want another example of 21st Century warfare?

During preparation for deployment, the DCG-Operations (who sports a Ranger combat patch) is getting excited about Agribusiness Development Teams.

Yes, you read that correctly.
 
Heh.  None of which is what *I* was talking about....
 
Heartless: He should ask for Joe Honan, then.  Already got that t-shirt in Iraq.

Heck, he should ask for SWWBO, she's going through it right now in Kansas!
 
I wasn't respondign to you, John. 

Though I'd say it's not so much 21st Century warfare so much as doing something a little different.  A bruhaha with CHina, Russia, or Venezuela won't look anything like what we're seeing in 'Stan or Iraq.  War just got a little bit more inclusive definition in doctrinal books, it hasn't really changed.
 
Not my Dads kind of war indeed.  His war was: fly to bridge, target bridge, bomb bridge, fly back to Japan and sleep, repeat.  My war was: drive to tank, launch TOW at tank, hold crosshair on tank for an agonizingly long 18 seconds, watch turret fly off, reload, repeat.  These days there are so many steps it would fill this page to list them all.  I have nothing but the greatest respect for our brave troops over there now.  They must have the patience of Job to put up with all the nonsence that is thrown at them, from the back as well as the front.  Perhaps one day this woman will tell her children about the day the infidel western invaders spared her life and treated her wounds.  Or perhaps she won't.  What is important to me is that these Soldiers will remember the day they met the enemy and showed mercy. 
 
John, I agree, this is not, your father's war. In fact, we are looking at whole new concepts of warfare. Whew, it appears the Army is looking at "COIN"  or counterinsurgency warfare. But, while they were developing "COIN", they were also developing another whole new concept called, "Full Spectrum Warfare".  Go to the Ft Leavenworth Army site- available to the public-

http://usacac.army.mil/

Take a look at the new Army Field Manuals, especially "COIN" or FM 3-24, "Stability Operations" or FM 3-07 and FM 7-0 "Full Spectrum Operations". I often hear our young warriors talking about feeling like their heads were on a swivel. Well, now they won't need to be concerned about the swivel. They better pull their heads out, smell the coffee, even have a cup, because it will be a whole new war for them.  They will need to be able to rotate their head on any axis at any moment. This will mean fighting offensively, defensively and in a civil support mode simultaneously. I wish the warriors my best!

Grumpy
   
Much of the over caution and such that's built into this new version of COIN was created more toward protecting our soldiers from the irrational, ignorant and incompetent media, as well as those among our population that are flat out, no holds barred, lovers of the enemy.

The homefront is becoming as much a threat as the active enemy in our "modern wars".
 
Grimmy - I think the same could be held true during the Civil War (in the North, Maryland/Delaware/Kentucky/Missouri especially) and World War One, giving examples from two wars in two different centuries where the sitting President resorted to what were later determined to be extra-legal means to control or diminish dissent.

Of course, supporters of the Lost Cause will assert the entire war as an extra-legal effort to diminish dissent, but lay that one aside on focus on Lincoln's actions with the Press in the North.

Wilson did the same sorts of things, as well as enlisting the populace to rat out people who didn't support the war, a not insignificant number of whom went to jail for the failure to be supportive enough, leave aside actually agitating against.  Just do a quick search in Google or your favorite search engine for "Palmer Raids."

The American Legion, in one of its less stellar acts, actually signed up as an organization to engage in that kind of suppression.

The history of WWI and its immediate aftermatch are one reason I just shake my head at the earnest, shaking-with-righteous-rage-at-the-injustice-of-Chimpy-McBushitler and his suppression of dissent. 

People have little sense of history, and even less sense of proportion.