<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for Flies in amber...</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/12/flies_in_amber.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/12/flies_in_amber_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:24:02 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>Flies in amber...</title>
            <description><![CDATA[...sometimes that's the image that flashes through my mind when I see photographs like the ones later in this post.&nbsp; 

They came from the CJTF101 PAO this morning, about a suicide bomber attack today in Mandozayi, Khowst Province,&nbsp;Afghanistan.



Attached is a video and stills of an insurgent suicide bomber attack on the Mandozayi district center earlier today (Sunday, 28 December) in Khowst province of Eastern Afghanistan, which killed sixteen Afghans (14 of them children); and wounded another fifty-eight (including at least 40 civilians). There were no ISAF casualties. Coalition and Afghan security forces worked together to evacuate wounded to both ISAF and local civilian hospitals.

The message from CJTF101 is simple - it was the closer to the notice.&nbsp; These photos and videos provide further proof the Afghan militants are not interested in the welfare or benefit of the Afghan people. ]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/12/flies_in_amber.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/12/flies_in_amber.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 10:12:19 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Grumpy on 2008-12-30</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[@fdcol63, if I had my preferences, if things could have been worked out, I would agree with you. The problem is that is not the situation on the ground. This is the situation we must work with for a LONG&nbsp;TIME. I understand your focus on your view, but we must focus on the present situation on the ground. As to your view, we are past that point. This is my point.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/12/flies_in_amber.html#comment-82266</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/12/flies_in_amber.html#comment-82266</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 19:03:53 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from fdcol63 on 2008-12-30</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Grumpy, you're right - but I wasn't speaking primarily of those occasions when we've already gone to war and are occupying the enemy's homeland, as in Germany, Korea, Iraq, and Afghanistan.<br />
<br />
I was referring to those periods ante-bellum, when diplomacy is still being played out.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/12/flies_in_amber.html#comment-82243</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/12/flies_in_amber.html#comment-82243</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 09:40:36 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Grumpy on 2008-12-29</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[@fdcol63, in theory, I agree, reciprocation would be appreciated. But we must understand, they are not in our homes, we are in theirs and there is a real primary home turf military advantage. To overcome this advantage, we need to do a very tough task. You might even think of it in the same light as one of General McCaffrey's After Action Reports, but over a long term basis. Grumpy, you use the term, Long Term After Action, what do you mean? Where do you start? Do you start with the 'surge', 'the action in Iraq', 'going into Iraq', 'pre-war Iraqi intel', 'Afghan war', 'post-9/11', '9/11', 'pre-9/11', 'The George W. Bush Election', the whole Bill Clinton Presidency and all of the intel issues with his Presidency'. I would then also do the same thing with George H.W. Bush's term in office and Persian Gulf I. The actual rank of the individuals are treated like patients in a Military Hospital, Flag officers leave your rank at the door, do as you are told! These individuals should have all of the 5th Amendment Rights from the US Constitution, as our military. ANSWER&nbsp;THE&nbsp;DAMN&nbsp;QUESTION!<br />
<br />
Grumpy, you are condemning many people! Wait a minute, the purpose of a test is to reveal the truth. The truth will condemn some actions and vindicate other actions. Note, that I am talking about condemning actions and not people. This is a major difference.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/12/flies_in_amber.html#comment-82241</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/12/flies_in_amber.html#comment-82241</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 22:25:38 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from fdcol63 on 2008-12-29</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Yes, language matters.&nbsp; But just as we in the US and the West need to better understand the nuance of language as&nbsp;it relates to THEM, they also need to better understand how&nbsp;it (and their behavior) applies to US and OUR worldview, and how WE interpret THEIR actions.<br />
<br />
It's a 2-way street ...... and too often, it seems that WE're bending over backward to keep from offending THEM. How about some reciprocation?]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/12/flies_in_amber.html#comment-82236</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/12/flies_in_amber.html#comment-82236</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:31:12 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Grumpy on 2008-12-29</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[@Armorer - LANGUAGE MATTERS more than we realize! There are so many times an issue is really based, not on an actual event, but upon a subtle nuance. This is the reason something like the Human Terrain System from D.O.D. is really very important. We need to understand the culture and language of the region. We should call this, &quot;Battlefield Awareness&quot;. First Rule of War - Know Your Enemy! &nbsp;NOTE- The first rule does not say, &quot;Know ABOUT your enemy.&quot; There is a very big difference.<br />
<br />
@Argent - 29 Dec 2008 2:05AM &nbsp; You write, &quot;I guess this is a complex matter...&quot;, If you are talking about the language or the overall battlefield situation, that, Sir, is called an &quot;understatement&quot;. &nbsp;You would be surprised by the list of names that feel the same way.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/12/flies_in_amber.html#comment-82235</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/12/flies_in_amber.html#comment-82235</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:04:45 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2008-12-29</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Grumpy - well done on bringing up aorist tense.&nbsp; It's a great example of why <em>language matters.&nbsp; </em>How we&nbsp;interpret the world around us&nbsp;both shapes and is shaped by how we communicate.&nbsp; And a common understanding of <em>concepts</em> requires a common basis of understanding in communication.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/12/flies_in_amber.html#comment-82226</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/12/flies_in_amber.html#comment-82226</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 09:19:51 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Argent on 2008-12-29</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I agree about the compassion Grumpy.&nbsp; I am instead drawing attention to people might feel they are displaying compassion but are instead displaying stupidity.&nbsp; I do this because I am concerned about those that use compassion to cover their fears and weaknesses.&nbsp; (I used the UK as an example).&nbsp; Feeling good about oneself is not nearly as useful as doing good.&nbsp; I guess this is a complex matter and off-topic.<br />
<br />
I had to look up aorist and it has taken me a while to understand the meaning.&nbsp; I found this site the most useful if anyone else is in the dark too;<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Aorist-tense" rel="nofollow">http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Aorist-tense</a><br />
<br />
Yes 'discipline' is an excellent word for what I mean.&nbsp; It has unfortunately been ground in too much as a word of action <em>upon</em> others which has distorted it's meaning to many people.&nbsp; But it's also <em>self</em> applied.&nbsp; 'Self discipline' some say to emphasize that point.&nbsp; It's important I think to practice it before we show it and help others with it.&nbsp; I think you've got a good point about what leadership is.<br />
<br />
I walked a path of very high self discipline.&nbsp; I learnt the hard way that this isn't always wise.&nbsp; It's very important to know some flexibility and even more so to know what to be disciplined about.&nbsp; That last part is very difficult.&nbsp; Discipline separates thought and action.&nbsp; Controlling our thoughts is difficult, perhaps impossible but contolling our actions is not.&nbsp; Discipline is where we control our actions by deciding which thoughts to act on.&nbsp; Therefore (from this rather simian point of view) the core challenge of discipline is in determining worthy actions from unworthy actions.&nbsp; The rest is merely luck and opportunity.<br />
<br />
Discipline is unpopular these days.&nbsp; We have the past of discipline misused such as with the Nazis and so many others.&nbsp; It's interesting how many men who beat their kids and wives to 'discipline' them lack that very quality which is part of why they are beating them in the first place.&nbsp; We have a time of plenty where we our incentive to be disciplined is weaker fueled by self indulgence humans were probably incapable of until now.&nbsp; <br />
<br />
Do young men learn real discipline?&nbsp; In the past they learnt to be submissive from beatings and in the present they learn self indulgence and apathy.&nbsp; Perhaps it time they learn discipline as self control, instead of these.<br />
<br />
Loosing face is important in the West too I think.&nbsp; Especially at social and political levels.&nbsp; Many of us also have post death reward attitudes.&nbsp; Chrisitians think of heaven.&nbsp; But they don't try to bring it about early in the name of God and murdering other people.&nbsp; I think that's a critical difference.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/12/flies_in_amber.html#comment-82222</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/12/flies_in_amber.html#comment-82222</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 02:05:09 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Oldloadr on 2008-12-29</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Grumpy - you hit the nail this time concerning embarrassment, or in the East, face.&nbsp; To lose face is worse than death to many in this region.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/12/flies_in_amber.html#comment-82221</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/12/flies_in_amber.html#comment-82221</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 00:05:04 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Grumpy on 2008-12-28</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[@Argent, &nbsp;compassion is NOT the ISSUE and never was, There is an interesting tense in ancient languages called, &quot;aeroist tense&quot; In the English, we translate it as &quot;past perfect tense&quot; The ancient tense has an everlasting past, everlasting present and everlasting future as a continuous line of thought. There is a word in my vocabulary and most probably equally in yours, the word, &quot;Discipline&quot;. Discipline is not just for the women, children and the poor. Discipline is also for the men of the region. A male with no discipline is not man regardless of your title or rank. If you want to think about discipline, first SHOW&nbsp;IT&nbsp;CONSISTENTLY, THEN TEACH&nbsp;IT&nbsp;BY&nbsp;PRECEPT. Showing this kind of attitude shows the real meaning of the word, &quot;LEADERSHIP&quot;]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/12/flies_in_amber.html#comment-82220</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/12/flies_in_amber.html#comment-82220</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 23:21:36 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Argent on 2008-12-28</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[It's blindness.&nbsp; To control oneself is a sign of strength that I think too many in the ME cannot see.<br />
<br />
The US and the West controls itself.&nbsp; All the wild accusations of holocausts, mass murders could become reality without such control.&nbsp; It would have great impact in the ME if it were done but though it might simpistically seem a sign of strength, it would be a sign of weakness.&nbsp; Instead we show much strength.&nbsp; We have both the incredible power and the self control.&nbsp; One problem of course is the will..<br />
<br />
Because we excercise self control in the wrong situations as well.&nbsp; When we should fight or should not wring our hands we do so, like in places Grumpy mentions.&nbsp; I see this from the UK a great deal.&nbsp; This *is* a sign of weakness.&nbsp; Compassion does not mean stupidity.<br />
<br />
One thing that I learnt before this war from an Iranian was that the country and city is as different as chalk and cheese.&nbsp; The country is tribal and under nominal national control at best.&nbsp; The cities, on the other hand, are far more like the West.&nbsp; In Afghanistan that probably only means Kabul.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/12/flies_in_amber.html#comment-82219</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/12/flies_in_amber.html#comment-82219</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 21:36:33 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Grumpy on 2008-12-28</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[@Oldloadr, Do me a favor get that hammer out John's hand, he's been hitting the nail on head, way too many times. I've got a headache. By the way, you're no help, you're doing pretty well at hit the nail on the head, yourself. To try to figure out the differences between Eastern and Western mindsets this is the real task for finding a real strategy to real victory. WARNING: There is a strategy of finding yourself captured as a virtual prisoner of the opposing mindset. The secret for avoidance of this trap is to know where you stand on the issue. The real differences are shown in the goals of warfare. For example take our concept of death, we are life-centered, therefore we try to avoid death at all costs. I am not saying the Eastern mindset is death-centered, on the contrary it is post-death reward-centered. Death is just seen as a necessary evil for transition. What would happen if we adjusted the view of the reward. We have a dead male suicide bomber, he is awaiting his reward. He sees 72 virgins, but wait a minute, they are not his. He sent to the next roomful of 72 virgins, wait a minute, they are all males. According to the paperwork, you are all theirs. Moral of the story: Don't mess with the people doing your paperwork!<br />
<br />
Just a thought: The worst thing you can do in the Eastern mindset is to embarrass, because it is an assault on family or tribe. The revenge for such an embarrassment is upon the whole family. You really begin to understand some of the insanity going on in the ME. The Western peoples and their media need to have a long debate with consequences on coverage of warfare. We need to discuss status of peoples and structures. The primary determinate factor should be usage. If it is being used in combat, it is &quot;fair game&quot;. This would include hospitals &nbsp;with patients, schools with students, all sacred places and even whole regions.<br />
<br />
Do I expect this to ever be applied? No, but if stirs up some discussion. I've met my goal.<br />
<br />
Grumpy]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/12/flies_in_amber.html#comment-82216</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/12/flies_in_amber.html#comment-82216</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 18:11:22 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Oldloadr on 2008-12-28</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[John - You hit the nail on the head with your remark about compassion (mercy) being seen as weakness in the eastern mind.&nbsp; If you remember, this was true in Viet Nam as well; whenever there was a lull in the bombing, the NVA and VC took it as a sign of weakness or lack of will for the fight and merely took advantage to regroup and resupply.&nbsp;&nbsp;IMHO, the Eastern mind reserves mercy for those born less fortunate and they dispense it in the form of alms for the poor.&nbsp; They would never think of showing mercy to an enemy, still capable of fighting and still in the field.&nbsp; They might show some compassion to POWs, but that is, at best precocious, and not to be depended on at any time.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/12/flies_in_amber.html#comment-82207</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/12/flies_in_amber.html#comment-82207</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 12:58:11 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


