<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for New Law Authorizes Veterans&apos; Salutes during National Anthem</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/new_law_authori.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/11/new_law_authori_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 17:16:25 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>New Law Authorizes Veterans&apos; Salutes during National Anthem</title>
            <description>Just in case you hadn&apos;t heard.</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/new_law_authori.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/new_law_authori.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:41:42 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Justthisguy on 2008-11-01</title>
            <description>
                Hey, I very properly sat during the national anthem, lots of times, when the other high school&apos;s band was playing it. Our band director stood and did a sword salute for all of us. I wonder if high school band directors are even allowed to have swords these days, let alone leave them lying about the office for the kids to play with. (This one had no edge, to speak of.)
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/new_law_authori.html#comment-79924</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/new_law_authori.html#comment-79924</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 13:19:32 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Consul-At-Arms on 2008-10-31</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I've quoted you and <a href="http://consul-at-arms.blogspot.com/2008/10/re-new-law-authorizes-veterans-salutes.html" rel="nofollow">linked to you here</a>.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/new_law_authori.html#comment-79881</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/new_law_authori.html#comment-79881</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:08:54 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from bc on 2008-10-31</title>
            <description>
                I&apos;m with Bill T. on this one.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/new_law_authori.html#comment-79880</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/new_law_authori.html#comment-79880</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 01:35:23 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from htom on 2008-10-31</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Good grief. It's been so long that I've forgotten the rules. And I'm going to have to practice. Oh, wait, I don't have to, I can do the hat - in - hand - over - the - heart thing. That's easier. Must go practice, though, for when someone wants me to demonstrate.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/new_law_authori.html#comment-79879</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/new_law_authori.html#comment-79879</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 00:16:49 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from BillT on 2008-10-30</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I remember the good ol' days when what wasn't prohibited *in writing* was permitted.<br />
<br />
Now it's flipped so that whatever isn't permitted *in writing* is prohibited.<br />
<br />
The plethora of lawyers with which we are plagued means that there are innumerable lampposts in dire need of decorating...<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/new_law_authori.html#comment-79874</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/new_law_authori.html#comment-79874</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:38:07 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Kevin on 2008-10-30</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Let's approach this in a different manner....<br />
<br />
Active duty folks have their regs/protocol to follow.&nbsp; No problem with that.<br />
<br />
However, once I'm out and a civilian.... them regs no longer apply and I sure don't need another friggin' law giving me permission to do... well, just about anything that doesn't harm another person or their property.<br />
<br />
I sure as hell don't need a law 'giving me permission', much less direction on how to salute my own nations flag.<br />
<br />
A pox on people who state; &quot;Y'know, there outa be a law&quot;.&nbsp; This mentality is the reason why we are the most&nbsp; litigated and litigious society on Earth.&nbsp; This mindset is why we have to have law libraries.<br />
<br />
The 10 Commandments and the 10 Ammendments seemed to work pretty well, til'....<br />
<br />
&quot;Y'know, there oughta be a law&quot;...<br />
<br />
And, if it's a law... then you break that law.... whaddya mean there are no punitive provisions?&nbsp; If not, then why make it a law?<br />
<br />
To me, this fails the common sense test.<br />
<br />
As a side note, I&nbsp;don't care for brandy, however I DO&nbsp;enjoy a daily snog of small batch bourbon or single malt scotch, with either a cigar or my pipe.<br />
<br />
And, I&nbsp;have &quot;smacked&quot; the guy sitting down during the National Anthem.&nbsp; Y'know, there oughta be a law and call the ACLU.<br />
<br />
Bah.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/new_law_authori.html#comment-79873</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/new_law_authori.html#comment-79873</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:28:17 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2008-10-30</title>
            <description>
                Yeh, I&apos;ve been a violator, I admit.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/new_law_authori.html#comment-79864</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/new_law_authori.html#comment-79864</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:21:49 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from BillT on 2008-10-30</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Law catches up with custom.<br />
<br />
*heh*<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/new_law_authori.html#comment-79863</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/new_law_authori.html#comment-79863</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:19:40 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2008-10-30</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<p>There isn't really an enforcement mechanism, Kevin.&nbsp; The previous regs technically didn't allow us to salute the flag.&nbsp; Now they do.&nbsp; For those of us who are kinda rule-bound and chafed at not being allowed to do something we were once authorized to do, it's a nice change.<br />
<br />
Methinks you are reading this rather harshly.&nbsp; All it says is - you, dude, can salute now instead of (as you formally were supposed to do) do the hand over the heart thing.<br />
<br />
That's all it says.<br />
<br />
It doesn't have punitive provisions to whack that never-served fellow next to you (who's unlikely to salute, anyway.).<br />
<br />
Here, have a brandy and go get a nice fat cigar outta that walk-in humidor you've got.&nbsp; You are wound *waaaaaay* too tight.</p>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/new_law_authori.html#comment-79860</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/new_law_authori.html#comment-79860</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:39:35 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Kevin on 2008-10-30</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Have we really come to this?&nbsp;&nbsp; A <em><strong>LAW</strong></em>&nbsp;is needed for a veteran to salute the flag?&nbsp; I&nbsp;understand why protocol regs would be drawn up for active duty personnel, but for veterans/civilians a... <em><strong>law</strong></em> is required?<br />
<br />
What's the enforcement mechanism for the <em><strong>law</strong></em>?&nbsp; A Flag Police Emergency Response SWAT&nbsp;team?<br />
<br />
What's the penalty for breaking the <em><strong>law</strong></em>?<br />
<br />
All that is not permitted is forbidden...<br />
<br />
To paraphrase Blazing Saddles;&nbsp; &quot;Permission?&nbsp; We don't need no stinkin' permission!&quot;<br />
<br />
And to quote Hee-Haw;&nbsp; &quot;Saaaaaa-lute!&quot;<br />
<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/new_law_authori.html#comment-79857</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/new_law_authori.html#comment-79857</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:16:33 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>

