Oct 02, 2008
BY Debi Dawson, Special to the Castle.
FORT BELVOIR, Va. (Army News Service, Oct. 2, 2008) -- As Soldiers training for combat look to lighten their load, they can look forward to the Lightweight .50-Caliber Machine Gun.
The LW50, an addition to the Army's arsenal of machine guns at one-half the weight of the M2 .50-Caliber Machine Gun and with 60 percent less recoil, does not require the setting of headspace and timing. The LW50 provides Soldiers with the punch of a .50-caliber machine gun in the footprint of a 7.62mm weapon system, allowing them to bring .50 caliber lethality to the fight in situations where using a light to medium machine gun is the only available option.
The LW50 is still in the early stages of system design and development and officials at the Program Executive Office Soldier at Fort Belvoir said they expect the weapon to be fielded in 2011. They said a limited two-part Early User Assessment for the weapon was conducted with Special Operations Command personnel in March and May.
The LW50, a technological spinout from the 25mm XM307 Advanced Crew Served Weapon program, is capable of firing all current .50-caliber ammunition in the inventory, including the standard M33 ball; the M8 armor-piercing incendiary; the M903 saboted light armor penetrator; and the MK211 multipurpose round that combines armor-piercing, explosive, and incendiary effects.
"A major benefit of the LW50 is the weight and recoil savings and no requirement to adjust the headspace and timing," said Shailesh Parmar, a product director for Product Manager Crew Served Weapons in the office of Project Manager Soldier Weapons. "The LW50 is expected to weigh less than 65 pounds, including tripod and traversing and elevation mechanism, compared with the M2 system's weight of 128 pounds, a savings of 63 pounds or more," said Parmar. He also noted that the LW50 can be set up faster than an M2 because it does not need ballast to weigh down the tripod due to less recoil.
The LW50's greatly reduced recoil enables Soldiers to use weapon-magnified optics and maintain sight picture of the target, which was unthinkable and potentially painful with the M2. "Lower recoil also means less dispersion of rounds and better accuracy," Parmar said. "That, in turn, makes it easier to qualify with the LW50, allows Soldiers to use rounds more economically, and reduces the logistical burden."
Staff Sgt. James Tyus of the 1st Battalion, 82nd Field Artillery was quick to notice the improvements while training on the weapon at Fort Hood, Texas. "It absorbs more recoil now. Given that, it makes the weapon more accurate. I like it for its accuracy," Tyus said.
The LW50's weight savings, reduced recoil, and increased accuracy allow for its use in places that were not feasible for an M2, such as in light infantry operations.
Once the LW50 is deployed, all vehicles that mount the M2 will be able to mount the new system. Tests have been successfully conducted mounting the system to the Stryker Combat Vehicle and the Common Remotely Operated Weapon Station.
Other benefits of the LW50 include safety and training applications. The LW50 eliminates the need for the operator to adjust the headspace and timing and for any special maintenance tools, reducing the amount of training required. The current LW50 has 131 parts, compared with 244 for the M2.
"It's a very unique weapon. You don't have to worry about timing," said Pvt. Michael Zinns with 1-82 Field Artillery, who, like Tyus, was introduced to the LW50 at Fort Hood. The teardown, too, "is actually a lot easier, and the barrels are much more easily interchangeable," Zinns said.
The Army recently issued a requirement for a lightweight .50 caliber machine gun. Furthermore, Special Operations Command (SOCOM) is developing lightweight vehicles that will need armament. SOCOM recognizes that a lightweight, low-recoil weapon suitable for these vehicles could see expanded use within dismounted units. The LW50 has the potential to satisfy those three needs in one package.
According to the current program cycle, the LW50 could be fielded at the end of FY11. Light units, such as the 82nd Airborne Division, the 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault), 10th Mountain Division, 25th Infantry Division, and SOCOM forces, are expected to benefit most from the new weapon.
"I think that's what a lot of us look for, a lighter weapon," said Tyus. "I'm really excited about it."
Seeing what PEO-Soldier is bringing to bear in the Global War on Terrorism "inspires and sustains our young Soldiers" as they prepare to deploy to Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom, said Command Sgt. Maj. Neil Ciotola of III Corps, Fort Hood, Texas. "Many of our first-term troopers and even our veterans who have one tour can look at that and go: 'That's what's waiting for me.' "
(Debi Dawson serves as the PEO-Soldier Strategic Communications Officer.)
If you'd like a 1000 pixel wide version of this picture - click here.
If you'd like the full-size picture - click here.
This one looks nice, my only question is the barrel itself. The M2 barrel would get very hot very quickly, and this barrel looks very thin. Some sort of alloy, stand up to the heat better?
Our guys who have their boots in the mud are carrying way, WAY too much load as it is. It is not helping things to come up with systems that will encourage commanders to add yet more weight to the load.
I know that there's a quick change barrel program out there for the M2, which would solve a lot of issues with the M2 (though setting headspace is easier than adjusting timing).
In a place like Afghanistan, where the terrain forces a large number of dismounted ops, I see this weapon being a lot less useful, for the reasons noted - weight of the ammo - as well as the fact that, since it can only be fired from a tripod, it's not as useful in a running gun fight as a weapon like the M240 or M249 that can be fired from a bipod as well as a tripod.
In a conventional fight, where you can set up your MGs on the SBF when attacking, or dug in in the defense, this gun would be great, although the ammo issue would lessen the utility in the offensive role.
And I thought they were making stuff up talking about the Mk211 AP-HE-I round on Sarah Connor Chronicles last night.
REALLY fragile.
Anyone else ever had to stick washers under the buffer of a sixty because the reciever had stretched? this looks like it's going to have THAT problem with use.
and the whippy barrel's kind of a head-scratcher too. The whole point of the HB on the M2HB is that it doesn't deform as much when you fire, so your shots will scatter less with use, and it can dump more heat without warping.
I see a stack of disadvantages here-and could someone tell me if the weight issues on an armored Humvee really require that you shave off fifty pounds somewhere? Or on, say, an MBT? It might be okay as a door-gunner's weapon on a medium Utility helicopter (weight actually IS an issue on a chopper, right?) but just looking at the picture I see a bunch of complicated bits that can fail through normal use-and-abuse.
Speaking as a former grunt that served back when the USMC was training heavy in the maneuver war methods (long humps of several day duration with everything we were going to us carried on our backs), I think this weapon as described is do-able.
Take away the tripod and T%E weight from the 65 lbs listed, and it's not significantly heavier than the Dragon tube or the old M29 base plate or tube. As for ammo weight, such a weapon system would be a battalion level asset as part of the weapons company. The gun would have a team and the team would be configured to include the necessary men to carry sufficient ammo. The ammo carriers would also serve as gun security and replacement crew in the event of casualties.
Also, in gun teams, trading off the load during humps is part of the process, so no one man would be saddled with the heaviest elements of the system for the entire duration.
This isn't something that would be put down into the rifle squads of a line company. So there's not much to the argument that having to hump the heavier rounds would displace rounds carried for the rifleman's use.
This would be something at battalion level, part of a weapons company. And weapons company is all about carrying heavy a**ed support weapons. I did it for years. In mountain training, jungle training, desert training, urban training and even, on occasion, in training in terrain that didn't totally suck. But I suspect that last bit was due to some training officer not reading the map properly.
First, just making sure.. but I'm not Grim. Grim is Grim Beorn of Grim's Hall.
I'm Grimmy. We're easy to tell apart. Grim is all educated and poeticy. I'm usually foul mouthed and knuckly draggy.
Second:
Yeah, the Army and the Marines are a bit different in TO&E at the infantry level. I think I remember marching past a truck, once.
Don't yuz guyz know nothing?
That gun obviously has a trans dimensional transference gizmo that displaces the mass of the bullet into someone else's universe while it travels down the barrel.
You'd think yuz never watched SciFi or sommat.
Exotic and Expensive, in other words. You're not going to get decent performance out of 4350 cut that way, nor 4150 Stainless. Even pre-stressed with the right hammer-forging, you're not looking at a barrel in the pic that's going to last very long in use, and it's going to cost out the ass.