<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for A post for snarkage...</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/a_post_for_snar.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/a_post_for_snar_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:26:30 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>A post for snarkage...</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Which I will probably live to regret...

Shockingly, an Infantryman of my acquaintance sent me this.



I would note he's a strategic planner by duty position and not any closer to the fight than the gun dogs he so gratuitiously slams...

We Redlegs, while lending dignity to what is otherwise a vulgar brawl, see it rather differently, of course.&nbsp; We gunners prefer to channel our inner Liddel-Hart:



If you wish to fire back, or dare I say, in support, you can make these gems at despair.com.

]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/a_post_for_snar.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/a_post_for_snar.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 10:10:31 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Casey on 2008-10-19</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Ohh, I dunno. Bill Mauldin did nearly as many drawings about the artillery as he did the doggies.<br />
<br />
He also drew one of the sharpest points of view on the differences between the Air Force and the Army...&nbsp; (&quot;Uncle Willie!&quot;)<br />
<br />
;)<br />
<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/a_post_for_snar.html#comment-79406</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/a_post_for_snar.html#comment-79406</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 23:23:22 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from AgPilot60 on 2008-10-19</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[John, If you can get this, my links are not working where I can contact you through this site anymore for some reason. Would you contact me back about 7.62 X 51 we talked about a few months ago?<br />
Thanks,<br />
Tommy<br />
Texas]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/a_post_for_snar.html#comment-79403</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/a_post_for_snar.html#comment-79403</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 22:22:31 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Brad on 2008-10-19</title>
            <description>
                Interesting they&apos;re using an artillery miniature from the Warhammer 40K roleplaying game in that first picture.  Those are fun units in the associated video games as well.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/a_post_for_snar.html#comment-79402</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/a_post_for_snar.html#comment-79402</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 20:45:44 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Justthisguy on 2008-10-19</title>
            <description>
                Indirect approach?  Hell yeah, I&apos;ve read Liddell-Hart!

As a person of some autitude, I don&apos;t think much of that &quot;wait &apos;till you see the whites of their eyes&quot; nonsense.

Sorry, enemy sojers, looking at yer eyeballs creeps me out; I prefer to kill you at further distances with bigger guns.

More efficient militarily, and less stress in my head from looking at the guys I&apos;ve killed.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/a_post_for_snar.html#comment-79401</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/a_post_for_snar.html#comment-79401</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 19:31:47 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Grimmy on 2008-10-19</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[jim b:<br />
<br />
Amen.<br />
Nothing beats the infantry for when there's a need to steal the dirt out from under the enemy.<br />
<br />
Cannon cockers are good too. Well, as long as they remember to put their product where they're told, when their told and in the amounts they're told to deliver.<br />
<br />
That's something the arty and the airdales have in common. Battlefield FedEx for nasty packages with a sign on delivery receipt for the addressee.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/a_post_for_snar.html#comment-79400</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/a_post_for_snar.html#comment-79400</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 19:26:42 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from JimC on 2008-10-19</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Remember Redlegs, The Queen tells the King where to put his balls.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/a_post_for_snar.html#comment-79399</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/a_post_for_snar.html#comment-79399</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 17:34:01 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from jim b on 2008-10-19</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[A toast to Infantry. <br />
<br />
Infantry lends a dash of vulgarity to what would otherwise be a very stuffy affair.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/a_post_for_snar.html#comment-79398</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/a_post_for_snar.html#comment-79398</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 17:13:39 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from J.M. Heinrichs on 2008-10-19</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[&nbsp;Artillery:&nbsp;Ubique ... (whistles)<br />
<br />
Cheers]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/a_post_for_snar.html#comment-79397</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/a_post_for_snar.html#comment-79397</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 13:59:40 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from 11B40 on 2008-10-19</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Greetings:<br />
<br />
By inclination and experience, I'm more of a &quot;close with and destroy the enemy&quot; kind of guy.<br />
<br />
But I have to admit that calling in that first DT (determined target) at the end of the day, did wonders in improving my map reading. &nbsp;<br />
<br />
Somewhere, in the back of my infantry mind, I always knew that if friendly indirect fire got me, it would be thanks to our own mortar platoon.&nbsp;]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/a_post_for_snar.html#comment-79396</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/a_post_for_snar.html#comment-79396</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 13:11:58 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from BillT on 2008-10-19</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Army Aviation. Because panache matters...<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/a_post_for_snar.html#comment-79395</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/a_post_for_snar.html#comment-79395</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 12:45:59 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John (not the armorer) on 2008-10-19</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Don't forget us blue suiters, if you are not too far inland.&nbsp; <br />
On station, ready for call for fire.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/a_post_for_snar.html#comment-79394</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/a_post_for_snar.html#comment-79394</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 11:42:32 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from XBradTC on 2008-10-19</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[This is <a href="http://xbradtc.wordpress.com/2008/06/23/never-trust-your-fellow-soldiers/" rel="nofollow">why I don't trus</a>t Artillerymen. <br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/a_post_for_snar.html#comment-79393</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/a_post_for_snar.html#comment-79393</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 11:08:41 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Greg on 2008-10-19</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Remember there are only two kinds of people in this world, Infantry and infantry support.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/a_post_for_snar.html#comment-79392</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/10/a_post_for_snar.html#comment-79392</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 10:44:23 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


