Comments for The naval war on drugs...

The naval war on drugs...

Wed, 17 Sep 2008 07:28:02 -0600

ATLANTIC OCEAN (Sept. 13, 2008) In this photo released by the U.S. Coast Guard, members of U.S. Coast Guard law enforcement detachment 404 survey the deck of the self-propelled, semi-submersible craft seized Saturday, Sept. 13, 2008, by the guided-missile frigate USS McInerney (FFG 8). The Coast Guard law enforcement officers, embarked aboard the McInerney, seized the estimated $187 million worth of cocaine during a night raid about 350 miles west of Guatemala. The seized vessel has the capability to travel from Ecuador to San Diego, Calif. U.S. Navy photo by Petty Officer 1st Class Nico FigueroaFlex and adapt, flex and...

Comment from Justthisguy on 2008-09-18

Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:42:38 -0600

Casey hast recht. I can think of a legitimate use for cocaine, aside from treating nosebleed, and eyeball anaesthesia. I think that every honest citizen should have a sealed bottle of cocaine powder in his medicine cabinet, prescribed for use only in the case of home invasion, seeing that said home invasion is more probably being done by government thugs than free-lance criminals, and we could all use some chemical help when going up against such odds.

Comment from Casey on 2008-09-18

Thu, 18 Sep 2008 13:00:23 -0600

Lessee, here. They captured $187 million worth of cocaine. The annual US use has been estimated between $50 billion - $70 billion.

Taking the lower estimate, they grabbed a whopping 0.374 percent (yes, under four-tenths of one percent) of the annual production.

Why do I have the feeling our tax money would be better spent elsewhere?

You know, if they let the Navy keep and sell all captures, maybe they could afford a couple of those $4 billion ~~cruisers~~ DDX destroyers they want...

Comment from emdfl on 2008-09-18

Thu, 18 Sep 2008 08:57:29 -0600

They should 'da just used it for target practice when the came up on it. It was obviously a hazard to navigation.

Comment from emdfl on 2008-09-18

Thu, 18 Sep 2008 08:55:42 -0600

Should'da just used it for target practice when they came up on it. It was obviously a "hazard to navigation".

Comment from Justthisguy on 2008-09-17

Wed, 17 Sep 2008 20:24:43 -0600

Good one, Captain Heinrichs. I think Deutschland's crew drank for free in NYC. (in Irish bars, at least)

Comment from J.M. Heinrichs on 2008-09-17

Wed, 17 Sep 2008 16:23:02 -0600

"SMS Deutchland"?

Cheers

Comment from XBradTC on 2008-09-17

Wed, 17 Sep 2008 12:03:09 -0600

The fact that DOD captions are so bad is frustrating because so many of the photos are so good.

Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2008-09-17

Wed, 17 Sep 2008 10:38:04 -0600

Heh. DoD caption writers generate more commentary... and I get angry emails from the DoD caption writer when it gets pointed out.

Mebbe it's all part of OPSEC.

Comment from RetRsvMike on 2008-09-17

Wed, 17 Sep 2008 10:25:29 -0600

...which could also explain the Coast Guard unit's designation of "404"

Comment from RetRsvMike on 2008-09-17

Wed, 17 Sep 2008 10:24:04 -0600

kinda hard to get to Atlantic waters by going 350 miles west of Guatemala....

not saying it can't be done.... just that you have a reeeally long second leg for the journey.

Comment from mike mariani on 2008-09-17

Wed, 17 Sep 2008 10:20:57 -0600

"...350 miles west of Guatemala..."

dateline is wrong; maybe that's where it was published?

Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2008-09-17

Wed, 17 Sep 2008 10:12:09 -0600

Well, I dunno. The official caption says in the Atlantic, but they give the range in terms of the Pacific... Ya sound angry!

The McInerny is homeported at Naval Station Mayport, Florida, so I'm guessing "Atlantic" is correct.

Comment from Sine Nomine on 2008-09-17

Wed, 17 Sep 2008 09:49:40 -0600

Atlantic or PACIFIC!??. California = Pacific Ecuador= Pacific???