<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for Should Rafael Peralta Get the Medal of Honor?  Questions</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/09/should_jose_per.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/09/should_jose_per_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:27:04 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>Should Rafael Peralta Get the Medal of Honor?  Questions</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Rafael&nbsp;Peralta's mother will petition congress to award the marine the Medal of Honor.&nbsp; 


Rosa Peralta said Thursday she made the decision after a Marine general told her that her son, Sgt. Rafael Peralta, would be awarded the Navy Cross rather than the Medal of Honor because the nomination was tainted by reports he was accidentally shot by a fellow Marine shortly before an insurgent lobbed the grenade.
The Problem:


&quot;There was conflicting evidence in the case of Sgt. Peralta as to whether he could have performed his final acts given the nature of his injuries,&quot; said Capt. Beci Brenton, spokeswoman for Navy Secretary Donald Winter.

Specifically:


Peralta was shot several times in the face and body during a house-to-house search in Fallujah on Nov. 15, 2004, during some of the fiercest fighting of the war.[snip]

The report found sufficient evidence existed to believe that Peralta was probably shot by a fellow Marine and that a gunshot wound to the head and injuries to the head from a grenade caused his death.

Sec. of Defense Gates convened five experts, including a neurosurgeon, two pathologists, a forensics scientist and a Medal of Honor winner to conduct a review of the medical records, autopsy and witness statements.&nbsp; 

My thoughts are]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/09/should_jose_per.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/09/should_jose_per.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:21:28 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Joe on 2008-09-19</title>
            <description>
                Umm, you have Jose written in the title and first paragraph, but the cited quoted have his name as Raphael.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/09/should_jose_per.html#comment-78478</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/09/should_jose_per.html#comment-78478</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:58:20 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John (not the armorer) on 2008-09-19</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[A true hero worthy of our respect and admiration, and even awe.<br />
<br />
However, the award criteria are rightly set high and demanding of total confirmation, preserving this as one of the few awards that have not been cheapened by ever more lenient standards (down to laughable generosity at some levels).<br />
<br />
Peralta&nbsp;probably earned the MOH.&nbsp; I&nbsp;would like to see his family receive it, but the Navy Cross is nearly as appropriate.&nbsp; We are certainly honored by the service of such outstanding men, and their families deserve our everlasting respect and assistance regardless of the color of the ribbon.<br />
<br />
Carlos Hatchock went thru a similar lengthy and ultimately unsuccessful nomination for the MOH and ended up with the Navy Cross. Many felt he was shortchanged as well.&nbsp; He merely felt he was a Marine doing his duty.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/09/should_jose_per.html#comment-78477</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/09/should_jose_per.html#comment-78477</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:40:46 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from AW1 Tim on 2008-09-19</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[My thoughts:<br />
<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; If this is the sort of criteria and the type of research to be done before awarding The Medal, then I expect that the same sort of due diligence will be applied to ALL awards.<br />
<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; To my mind, there are far too many staff weenies and other RAMF's walking around with bits of coloured cloth and tin hanging on their chests who did MUCH less to earn them, and in many cases simply were within the technical parameters of the award.<br />
<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; This Marine deserves The Medal, and by all accounts OUGHT to receive it. If he doesn't, then I would like to have the General who denied it to him stand on a podium in front of the cameras and read the citations for, and justify, every single award HE is wearing.<br />
<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Quit 'effn around and award Jose Peralta The Medal of Honour. If not for himself, then on behalf of those who gave their all and remain unknown to us to this day. <br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/09/should_jose_per.html#comment-78476</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/09/should_jose_per.html#comment-78476</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 06:45:50 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Old Dog on 2008-09-19</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Well, unless they have some proof that someone threw him on that Grenade; how else did he get htere other than concious action.  Does it matter that he had been by fire whether hostile or friendly.<br />
<br />
<br />
If someone did not throw him on that grenade he is deserving of the MOH.  He gave his life for his buddies!<br />
<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/09/should_jose_per.html#comment-78475</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/09/should_jose_per.html#comment-78475</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 02:32:32 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Mad Roger Cash on 2008-09-19</title>
            <description>
                There has been some discussion of this over at Lex&apos;s place, matey.

The slack-arsed lubbers in the Pentagon are suckin the monkey, Argghhh!
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/09/should_jose_per.html#comment-78471</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/09/should_jose_per.html#comment-78471</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:52:04 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


