<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/09/heh_6.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/09/heh_6_atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2012://1/tag:www.thedonovan.com,2008://1.9738-</id>
  <updated>2012-03-24T15:27:22Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Heh...</title>
  <subtitle>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.12</generator>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2008://1.9738</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/09/heh_6.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/cgi-bin/mt41/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=9738" title="Heh..." />
    <published>2008-09-10T13:59:43Z</published>
    <updated>2008-09-10T14:18:15Z</updated>
    <title>Heh...</title>
    <summary><![CDATA[&nbsp;This is not unexpected.
&lt;br /]]></summary>
    <author>
      <name><![CDATA[Dusty (AKA <em>Attila of Argghhh!</em>)]]></name>
      <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Aircraft" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com/">
      <![CDATA[&nbsp;<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122105210879619199.html?mod=djemalertNEWS"><u><strong>This</strong></u></a>&nbsp;was not unexpected.<br /> <br /> A political football for years, this struggle has left a string of bodies in its wake, not the least of which was one of the <a href="http://formerspook.blogspot.com/2007/04/mr-mccain-and-csar-x.html"><u><strong>finest 4-stars</strong></u></a>&nbsp;(scroll down to Para 5) I ever had the distinct pleasure to work with. Alas, he got caught in the kill sack between the Pentagon, Air Force and the *cough* Congress.<br /> <br /> Both sides have legit issues and the whole thing was a chocolate mess from the start--and trust me, I'm no friend of Boeing--but the Airbus, in my humble opinion, couldn't do all the <a href="http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/kc-x-protest.htm"><u><strong>things</strong></u></a> it should have been able to do.<br /> <br /> Finally, and I'll do a little more digging to back this up, but I wouldn't trust a French company any farther than I could throw their headquarters building when it comes to maintaining any semblance of security on the KC-30s vulnerabilities. That little list would be emailed to Moscow, Beijing and Teheran before the first jet was on the ramp.<br /> <br /> <br type="_moz" />]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2008://1.9738-comment:78174</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2008://1.9738" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/09/heh_6.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/09/heh_6.html#comment-78174" />
    <title>Comment from Murray on 2008-09-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Murray</name>
        
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[No &quot;fire support blogs&quot;?<br />
<br />
Damn, dipped out again.<br />]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-09-11T02:59:12Z</published>
    <updated>2008-09-11T02:59:12Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2008://1.9738-comment:78159</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2008://1.9738" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/09/heh_6.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/09/heh_6.html#comment-78159" />
    <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2008-09-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>John of Argghhh!</name>
        <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Geez, Dusty - I'm just looking for the silver lining, not making recommendations!</p>
<p>Snerk!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-09-10T18:17:55Z</published>
    <updated>2008-09-10T18:17:55Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2008://1.9738-comment:78154</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2008://1.9738" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/09/heh_6.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/09/heh_6.html#comment-78154" />
    <title>Comment from Attila of Argghhh! on 2008-09-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Attila of Argghhh!</name>
        <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com">
        <![CDATA[&nbsp;Casey,<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.boeing.com/commercial/767family/" rel="nofollow"><u><strong>They did</strong></u></a>.]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-09-10T17:42:45Z</published>
    <updated>2008-09-10T17:42:45Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2008://1.9738-comment:78153</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2008://1.9738" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/09/heh_6.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/09/heh_6.html#comment-78153" />
    <title>Comment from Casey on 2008-09-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Casey</name>
        <uri>http://www.thegantry.net/blog</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thegantry.net/blog">
        <![CDATA[At the risk of sounding stupid, why not go with (say) an existing Boeing design? They need a cargo carrier/tanker, yes? Surely the company has a wide variety available.<br />
<br />]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-09-10T17:20:48Z</published>
    <updated>2008-09-10T17:20:48Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2008://1.9738-comment:78149</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2008://1.9738" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/09/heh_6.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/09/heh_6.html#comment-78149" />
    <title>Comment from Attila of Argghhh! on 2008-09-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Attila of Argghhh!</name>
        <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com">
        <![CDATA[&nbsp;Well, Mikoyan and Sukhoi are also nationally subsidized and make big airplanes too so, by that logic, why not go with them?&nbsp;They would probably be cheaper and willing to build something that we can use, who Northrop can partner with and, like the 'Bus do <em>most</em> of what the proposal calls for. Besides, their strategic goals are fairly similar to the French, no?]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-09-10T16:12:58Z</published>
    <updated>2008-09-10T16:12:58Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.thedonovan.com,2008://1.9738-comment:78148</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.thedonovan.com,2008://1.9738" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/09/heh_6.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/09/heh_6.html#comment-78148" />
    <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2008-09-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>John of Argghhh!</name>
        <uri>http://www.thedonovan.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedonovan.com">
        <![CDATA[There is a silver lining to the Airbus bid, should that team win the recompete.<br />
<br />
Then at least, Euro-taxpayers will be subsidizing *our* defense expenditures...]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-09-10T16:05:11Z</published>
    <updated>2008-09-10T16:05:11Z</updated>
  </entry>
  
</feed>


