previous post next post  

Dusty Asked... Our gurlz are better than their boyz.

And these two videos show it -

The late, unlamented Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, aka أبومصعب الزرقاوي -

 



Governor Palin - note, she pays attention to what she's told...  and therefore knows how to use her weapon.


Heh, and she manages to keep the weapon up and down range - rather than just swinging it around pointing it at whoever happens to be in the way...

1 Trackbacks

TrackBack this entry at http://www.thedonovan.com/cgi-bin/mt41/mt-tb.fcgi/9348

Our women shoot better than you. Losers. (hat tip: Tigerhawk) Technorati tags: Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, Sarah Palin, gun safety, jihad, war, Alaska, Iraq Read More

8 Comments

She's also got the concept of "controlled burst" as opposed to "spray and pray"...
 
You all think the Secret Service will let her carry her own piece?  (LOL)
 
Did I hear someone telling her that "youi're hitting pretty close to dead center?"

 
I rather expect they'll have to-I 'magine she'll use the dreaded xourging of the "Mom Tone"  on them...unless somehow her Protective Detail are all female or something, they'll be helpless to prevent her.  (besides, I kinda suspect she's a better shot than most of 'em.)
 
You should really appeal to the conspiracy mindsets of Zarq man's disciples by saying that it was Palin herself who led to Z man's death by over pressure.

She, like all women, has evil powers that the Islamic Shariah Law is designed to keep in check. We, however, unleash such powers and that should make them afraid, not mad.
 
Obama: no decision-maker; no courage; less experience:

Sarah Palin has government executive experience. She has lots of experience actually making decisions - as Mayor, Commissioner, and then Governor. She's been in elective office since 1992.

Barack Obama has been in elective office just since 1997 - and always as a legislator. he's never had to make executive decisions in a government administration like Gov. Palin.

So Sarah Palin has five (5) more years of experience in elective office than Barack Obama.

And Obama often could not muster the courage to make even a legislative decision - he frequently voted "present."

See <a href="http://www.time-blog.com/swampland/2008/01/obama_campaign_defends_present.html">here</a>

http://www.time-blog.com/swampland/2008/01/obama_campaign_defends_present.html

 
Well lets see .....George Bush and his well experienced band of brothers have managed the following:

1) Worst fiscal record ever. Certainly not a fiscal conservative in any republican sense anyway.
2) Two full blown guerilla wars and counting.
3) Posssibly just reignited the cold war with Russia by supporting Georgia.
4) Disastrous responce to Katrina cost over 1000 lives.
5) Spent over 400 Billion of US taxpayer money on aforemented guerilla wars.

I think at this point for the current administration to suggest Obama has no experience is probably a good thing as experience itself has clearly proven the Bush administration has learned nothing.
 
1) Worst fiscal record ever. Certainly not a fiscal conservative in any republican sense anyway.

By whose accounting -- the GAO's or the DNC's?

2) Two full blown guerilla [sic] wars and counting.

The foundations for which were laid a decade and more before Bush's election.

3) Posssibly [sic] just reignited the cold war with Russia by supporting Georgia.

And possibly did *not*. And the Cold War was never *ignited* -- if it had been, I wouldn't be here and neither would the site -- because John and Dusty wouldn't be here, either. And neither would the Internet. And, in all probability, neither would *you*.

4) Disastrous responce [sic] to Katrina cost over 1000 lives.

Last time I looked, neither the Mayor of NO nor the governor of LA -- who both had primary responsibility for disaster preparedness down there -- were in the White House. Or even in the Republican Party, for that matter.

5) Spent over 400 Billion of US taxpayer money on aforemented [sic] guerilla wars.

We're not allowed to spend other countries' taxpayers' money.

I think at this point for the current administration to suggest Obama has no experience is probably a good thing as experience itself has clearly proven the Bush administration has learned nothing.

Your closing argument isn't supported by your talking points. In fairness, though, I might add that Obama's crew is doing a pretty good job of campaigning against someone who isn't running for re-election...