My first response was "WTF?"
Blackfive's note of the AP headline maybe at fault for this really bad reporting. And, points us to Confederate Yankee's post on the subject and the NYT's coverage.
The truth of the attack on the French is not complete, but original information indicates that the attack was a completely separate event. In fact, a far distance from the original attack on Salerno. The French were on a security convoy with Afghanistan troops and were attacked by an estimated 100 (?) Taliban. The French and ANP were supported by American air assets that eventually drove the attackers off. Sarkozy is on his way to Afghanistan to meet the wounded and support the French troops.
According to the report, 24 French have died in Afghanistan to date and 176 international soldiers beyond American losses.

I started to leave the last without comment beyond a link, but ten soldiers died and 21 were wounded, not inlcuding their Afghan counter parts. We have certainly seen our share of very large scale attacks ending with many dead and wounded. I hope, with all sincerity and respect for the sacrifice of these soldiers, that our French allies review their convoy protocols and institute some updated training. For the sake of your men.
Just a thought.
God bless these young soldiers, comfort those who were wounded and those whose families must surely grieve today.
earlier instructions regarding briefing techniques are hereby revoked.
Still, I think my original point is correct. these folks need to review their SOP for convoys before the Taliban AAR for this attack gets passed around and the French find themselves favored targets.
FOB Salerno is near Khost, well south of the capital, near the Pak border.
Headlines like "Taliban Conducts Banzai Charge and Gets Waxed" don't sell papers.
Or advance the Democrat agenda.
You know what's wrong with that? It still bleeds and it still leads, it just changes who is bleeding and who is leading. In effect, I believe such a headline would get more reading from US citizens. however, it is full of hubris as they say and we are so trying not to be too proud or loud. At least, that is the media's other excuses. They don't want to get burned with propaganda yet they are spreading propaganda simply by printing it. They have an international audience, but the ones that actually pay their bills and that they are losing are right here in the USA.
that is what happens when you are a local company trying to act like a global corporation without creating separate divisions while trying to sell a product as "universal" when the product, information, truth, etc has never been universal in the first place.
But they're *creating* it in order to print it. The number of retractions the NYT has had to publish would embarrass the editor of a supermarket tabloid...
</b>
Personally, I think this is what happens when you let treason prosper.