<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for IPB*</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/ipb.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/ipb_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:27:01 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>IPB*</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Our Usual Provider&nbsp;has resigned from doing the IPB, due to a work opportunity he has which essentially forbids him to appear on the 'net on anything that dares have a political opinion.&nbsp; Well and good, free speech is free speech, and it can come with costs.&nbsp;&nbsp;Our Usual Provider (He Who Should Not Be Named)&nbsp;needs the job and the true opportunties it offers.&nbsp; There is another, who also prefers to Not Be Named, who has stepped up to read the &quot;other side of the 'net&quot; (sometimes just defined as contrary opinions, not politics) so that we periodically stick a straw through our bubble and peer at The Others.&nbsp; On to linkage...

Two from Juan Cole.&nbsp; First is a tear down of Obama's policy vis WoT.&nbsp; Second is a less than flowery appraisal of 'The Surge.&nbsp;
&nbsp;
Two book reviews.&nbsp; The first is a kind of first book for grad level work on warfare.&nbsp;&nbsp; The second is about the dark side of collateral damage.&nbsp;&nbsp;
&nbsp;]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/ipb.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/ipb.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:14:35 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Ymarsakar on 2008-07-29</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[&lt;B&gt; <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/jul/15/climatechange" rel="nofollow">Could it be that their laws will make us more of a police state than any anti-terror one ever will</a>?&lt;/b&gt;<br />
<br />
Come on, you know ELF laws will be just like Sharia. There's no question of that.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/ipb.html#comment-75886</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/ipb.html#comment-75886</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:21:02 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from BillT on 2008-07-29</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>More important is the question of whether provincial elections will be held in the disputed Kirkuk Province, which the Kurds want to annex. That dispute has caused </em><a href="http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hdMejDPUZGJWX3JekOBwhxHrfWAA" rel="nofollow"><em><span style="color: windowtext; text-decoration: none;">(Kurdish) President Jalal Talabani to veto the enabling legislation</span></em></a><em> </em>[link not linked]<em> for the provincial elections, which may set them back months or indefinitely.</em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>There is also no oil law, essential to allow foreign investment in developing new fields</em>.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>&ndash; Juan Cole</p>

<p>First of all, Kirkuk&rsquo;s a city &ndash; the Province is At-Ta&rsquo;mim, and Kirkuk was Kurdish before the Ba&rsquo;ath forcibly relocated most of its inhabitants after the first superfields were found. The Kurds don&rsquo;t want to annex Kirkuk, the dispute is over representation in Parliament -- the present population is one-third Kurd, one-third Turkman and another third Sunni Iraqi and the Kurds claim they&rsquo;ve been undercounted in the census. They also fear that they&rsquo;ll be outvoted in the Kirkuk municipal council by an ad-hoc alliance between the Turkmans and the Iraqis.</p>
<p>Iraq has had a new oil law since March &ndash; which replaced the *old* oil law -- and the Kurds are upset with that, too, because it nullifies the existing contracts the Kurds negotiated with foreign investors under the previous law.</p>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/ipb.html#comment-75882</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/ipb.html#comment-75882</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 06:31:28 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Cannoneer No. 4 on 2008-07-28</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[RE:&nbsp; <a href="http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/JG17Df02.html" rel="nofollow"><strong>Militants ready for a war without borders</strong></a><br />
<br />
See <a href="http://ctc.usma.edu/sentinel/CTCSentinel-Vol1Iss8.pdf" rel="nofollow">Propaganda and Peace Deals:&nbsp; </a><a href="http://ctc.usma.edu/sentinel/CTCSentinel-Vol1Iss8.pdf" rel="nofollow">The Taliban&rsquo;s Information War in Pakistan</a><br />
<br />
<blockquote>
<em>&ldquo;Any U.S. plan to combat Islamist extremism that relies on effective ground action from the Pakistani Army, the FC, or the Khasadars will&nbsp;fail.&rdquo;</em>
</blockquote>
<p>Between the ISI, the ethnic Pashtun Taliban sympathizers at all levels of the Pakistani Armed Forces, and the Taliban&rsquo;s highly successful Psychological Operations, the Paks aren&rsquo;t much of an ally. But somehow the jingle trucks from Karachi and tankers from Rawalpindi keep getting through. When they stop getting through, there won&rsquo;t be much reason left to worry about pissing off the Paks.</p>
<p>The nuclear Westphalian nation-state of Pakistan is incapable of exercising sovereignty over the tribal areas. Can they do much about cross-border raids?</p>
Pashtun-speaking ANA Commando Kanaks are capable of cross-border incursions now.&nbsp; An integrated Combined Joint Special Operations Task Force ostensibly under Afghan command could do much to annoy the various Bad Guys in their sanctuaries.<br />
<br />
Bring back <a href="http://cannoneerno4.wordpress.com/2008/05/11/what-happened-to-the-afghan-security-forces/" rel="nofollow">the ASF</a>.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/ipb.html#comment-75863</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/ipb.html#comment-75863</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:21:57 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


