<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for General (R) McCaffrey&apos;s latest AAR - this one from Afghanistan</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/08/general_r_mccaf_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:53:32 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>General (R) McCaffrey&apos;s latest AAR - this one from Afghanistan</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Tough times and choices ahead for the next President, whoever it is.&nbsp;THE BOTTOM LINE: SIX ASSERTIONS.1 &nbsp;Afghanistan is in misery. 68% of the population has never known peace. Life expectancy is 44 years. It has the second highest maternal mortality rate in the world: One of six pregnant Afghan women dies for each live birth. Terrorist incidents and main force insurgent violence is rising (34% increase this year in kinetic events.) Battle action and casualties are now much higher in Afghanistan for US forces than they are in Iraq. The Afghan government at provincial and district level is largely dysfunctional and corrupt. The security situation (2.8 million refugees); the economy (unemployment 40% and rising, extreme poverty 41%, acute food shortages, inflation 12% and rising, agriculture broken); the giant heroin/opium criminal enterprise ($4 billion and 800 metric tons of heroin); and Afghan governance are all likely to get worse in the coming 24 months.&nbsp;]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:23:56 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Ymarsakar on 2008-08-01</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[&lt;B&gt;I have no problem with NGOs and private citizens helping those guys out&lt;/b&gt;<br />
<br />
Just make sure those NGOs don't have children locked up for entertainment somewhere else around the world.<br />
<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76122</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76122</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:39:16 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Justthisguy on 2008-08-01</title>
            <description>
                Battle off Samar ain&apos;t in it. As P.J. O&apos;Rourke said, we _pay attention_ to Afghanistan at our peril.  By &quot;we&quot;, I think he meant everybody on the planet who isn&apos;t an Afghan.

That&apos;s the attitude our government ought to take. I have no problem with NGOs and private citizens helping those guys out, but those guys really do live on the other side of the planet.

Friends of Liberty everywhere, guardians only of our own, baby. 
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76072</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76072</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 01:46:42 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Dawnsblood on 2008-08-01</title>
            <description>
                Sorry John. In my time at Free Republic I have noticed that they don&apos;t click through alot. I had hoped they would to read the full report but based on the comments left they did not. I hope you at least got some traffic from the link. I&apos;ll just add that I have thought for several years that Afghanistan would be a harder nut to crack than Iraq. People I knew would laugh when I said it but reality is pretty clear. Iraq has a citizenry that is at least nominally of the mind that they are Iraqi. Afghanistan is ethnicity, tribe and then religion, the country of Afghanistan is an afterthought for them. My best to you and your loyal commenters :)
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76071</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76071</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:08:37 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Ymarsakar on 2008-07-31</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Depends on if Obama's on the CVE or not.<br />
<br />
<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76066</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76066</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:05:35 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Ymarsakar on 2008-07-31</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<strong>&lt;B&gt;Sigh.  All the costs of empire, without any of the benefits.   &lt;/b&gt;</strong><br />
<br />
A self-sustaining and non-expansionist Empire that doesn't need loot, foreign captives, slaves, prostitutes, or resource exploitation monopolies...<br />
<br />
America sure does come up with weird things, John. Things nobody has ever seen done before.<br />
<br />
I'm pretty sure America will also be the first one to detonate a 1 gigaton anti-matter warhead sooner or later. Preferably, not within one AU of Earth.<br />
<br />
On a geopolitical scene, India is going to be critical if you wish to take out Pakistan.<br />
<br />
Without India, slow going given Pak's pop and logistical constraints, from our side.<br />
<br />
Without a central organization to defeat, we're going to have to get allied tribes in Pakistan. How's that going to work is a little tricky, when you are also trying to sustain a &quot;central authority&quot; in Pakistan by the name of Mushie.<br />
<strong><br />
&lt;B&gt;The changing demographics within Europe are a grave concern, also, John.  Increasing numbers of unassimilated and radicalized Muslims will have a large impact, I think, on the willingness of NATO to effectively engage in the war against militant Islam.&lt;/b&gt;</strong><br />
<br />
What I'm worried about is when they have enough power there to take control of France's nukes. Then what is going to happen to America's anti-missile defenses? The Arabs and Persians can adapt, if they can't get working nukes by building it themselves, even with stolen tech, then they'll just steal the capacity from somebody else. Or put their own leader in the position to launch them.<br />
<br />
The single advantage America still holds, psychologically, is the posession and use of thermonuclear devices. If even that gets taken away and given to terrorists, then that means America's power will be easily challenged. They already have an advantage propaganda wise over us. Give them nukes, the ultimate propaganda weapon, even if it is like only one shot sometimes, and watch how many more people will realize that America is no longer the top dog to fear any more.<br />
<br />
There is only one nation in the history of the damned Earth that has ever used nuclear devices on actual cities and targets. That is a legacy and tradition more valuable than most might guess. It's certainly more valuable than Russia and China simply possessing nukes. They may possess them. But you know America's works and will work on you.<br />
<br />
That's why nobody would even think about invading America, toe to toe, on her own territory. But that's not a permanent state of things. If they lose confidence in America's response or if they gain greater confidence in another power, then nothing is off the table.<br />
<br />
A fission or thermonuke bomb is a great negotiating and bargaining asset.<br />
<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76064</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76064</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:57:32 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2008-07-31</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Heh.&nbsp; The last stand of the Tin Can Sailors.<br />
<br />
That's what we do, when we have to.<br />
<br />
The question is - will they let us stand by the <em>Gambier Bay</em>, as the <em>Johnston</em> did, &nbsp;or order us to flee...]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76063</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76063</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:45:43 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Ymarsakar on 2008-07-31</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<strong>&lt;B&gt;Snerk!  Why am I not surprised to see you advance that thesis, Ymar...&lt;/b&gt;</strong><br />
<br />
i can't help it that I've been corrupted by my study of the military. You guys shouldn't have been so hardcore to begin with in Thermopylae, Leyte Gulf, Saipan, Italy, Flight 93, and the various other minor incidents in human history.<br />
<br />
It's a gut reaction by now. Can't help it.<br />
<br />
If you are going to get shot, no matter what you do, you might as well get shot from the front rather than the back. That way, at least your hands will be on their throat and your fangs exposed for the kill when you die. And who knows... maybe the horse will learn to sing. <br />
<br />
<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76062</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76062</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:44:51 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Ymarsakar on 2008-07-31</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Take it in the fashion that Ymar would say it.<br />
<br />
I suppose you just don't understand the difference between &quot;losing&quot; and being doomed. The South lost the war, badly given the sacrifices men had given and the suffering both suffered and caused. But they weren't doomed. They actually had a better future by losing, than if they had won with a Disunited States of America that practiced slavery. Europe could easily have pitted one America against the other, just l ike the Democrats and John Edwards have tried to do. <br />
<br />
<strong>Come on, Ymar.  You're a gamer.</strong><br />
<br />
That's not a wise tactical ploy to open your argument out with.<br />
<br />
<strong>That's the play of a gamer who can't think of anything better to do than attack because he sees his position as hopeless.</strong> <br />
<br />
No, that's when you reload, like Jeffrey mentioned over at Grim/Cassandra's place. <br />
<br />
But in real life, you can't reload. If you don't take the chance, life, and time allotted to you to do as much damage as you can, you won't ever get a second one. <br />
<br />
There's many ways to win and many ways to lose, but there's only one path left when doomed. Flight 93. Given that they thought there was a bomb on board and then they thought the airplane was going to be used as a bomb, either way they were pretty doomed. They kept fighting, though, because. Because they weren't like you, they didn't have the luxury of saying &quot;hold on, we can't attack when our position is hopeless, let's think about this&quot;. Yeah, let's think about it. Thinking will make us undoomed, alright. <br />
<br />
<strong>and go ona death ride</strong> <br />
<br />
Did you ever see that one ride in Leyte Gulf conducted by the destroyers escorting America's escort carriers against the Japanese attack fleet (Northern and Southern forces)? <br />
<br />
A destroyer, at the end, trying to run torpedo solutions on battleships and an entire fleet. Can you get any more doomed? <br />
<br />
Scorn it all you wish, but it won't change the facts. <br />
<br />
<strong>because we can't think of another good play at the moment.</strong> <br />
<br />
As a parting shot, some people may be able to sit in their chairs and have all the time in the world to come up with alternatives. Other people might just have to play the hand they were dealt. <br />
<br />
The other things you mentioned weren't really what I was interested in portraying, so I left them be. <br />
<br />
P.S. <br />
<br />
It doesn't really matter what you or I agree on or disagree on, there's always going to be an argument if you pick fights with something I&nbsp;wrote that you didn't like.<br />
<br />
People can try to deconstruct my one liners or comments all they want, but don't be surprised when there's more coming if you choose to do so. Which means what? Which means that when I&nbsp;use one liners or short comments, I'm not making an argument. You will know when I'm making an argument.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76059</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76059</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:33:10 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from kat-missouri on 2008-07-31</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Tsk, tsk...you do take things too seriously.&nbsp; I don't think we're &quot;doomed&quot;.&nbsp; I'm ** years old and people have been saying that for years.&nbsp; But, it was a thought LOL<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76058</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76058</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:11:15 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Charlie Browns Teacher on 2008-07-31</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<p><em>&nbsp;If we're doomed, we should take everybody down before hand.</em><br />
I'm not sure if I should take that in the tone of The Joker fromt he latest Batman, Al Capone, or Denethor the Steward of Gondor,&nbsp;but anyone who pours oil on me while I'm sleeping is going to see how cranky I can be.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Really, so we can't win totally so let's just burn it all down?&nbsp; Okay, I'm playing Bill Buckley here and shouting stop.&nbsp; That way leads madness.&nbsp; Come on, Ymar.&nbsp; You're a gamer.&nbsp; You know how useless such things are.&nbsp; That's the play of a gamer who can't think of anything better to do than attack because he sees his position as hopeless.&nbsp; It isn't hopeless.&nbsp; It's just freakin' insanely difficult.&nbsp; We turned Iraq around with people jumping off the ship(SPain, Aus quit, UK is quitting).&nbsp; So some Euro-weenie is scared of pissing of Moslems in his country?&nbsp; Fine, we'll do it without them.&nbsp; The Brits left Basra a $hithole with their COIN strategy(which sounds rather like strategies some are pushing, people we don't like), and yet it's now on a positive path.</p>
<p>It's much harder without them, it means we can't go elsewhere, but it can be done if we don't despair and go ona death ride because we can't think of another good play at the moment.</p>
<p>Tsk, tsk, Kat.&nbsp; <br />
&nbsp;</p>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76055</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76055</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:47:06 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from fdcol63 on 2008-07-31</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[We're doomed if we continue to allow Muslim imams to preach hatred against the US, the West, and Israel, and to spread the cancer of their culture of death and martyrdrom among their children, all in the name of multicultural &quot;tolerance&quot;, especially in Europe, North America and elsewhere in the Anglosphere, while allowing them to&nbsp;whittle away&nbsp;our hard-won civil liberties and establish Sharia legal systems within our own countries.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76053</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76053</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:34:57 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from kat-missouri on 2008-07-31</title>
            <description>
                Funny, for once I was thinking exactly as Ymar...if we&apos;re going down, everybody&apos;s coming with us
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76051</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76051</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:02:10 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2008-07-31</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Snerk!&nbsp; Why am I&nbsp;not surprised to see you advance that thesis, Ymar...]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76050</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76050</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:49:28 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Ymarsakar on 2008-07-31</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[If we're doomed, we should take everybody down before hand.<br />]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76049</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76049</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:37:07 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2008-07-31</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<p>If that's true, Frank, according to McCaffrey, we're doomed.&nbsp; If we're doomed, we should pull out now.</p>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76048</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76048</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:07:03 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from fdcol63 on 2008-07-31</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[The changing demographics within Europe are a grave concern, also, John.&nbsp; Increasing numbers of unassimilated and radicalized Muslims will have a large impact, I think, on the willingness of NATO to effectively engage in the war against militant Islam.<br />
<br />
Almost 1/3 of Muslim students in a recent&nbsp;British poll said that killing in the name of religion can be justified:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=9ce_1217469047" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=9ce_1217469047" rel="nofollow">http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=9ce_1217469047</a></a><br />
<br />
As native European birthrates decline and the population ages, they're going to rely more and more on immigrants - most likely Muslims - to help prop up their socialist welfare states. Coupled with&nbsp;latent European anti-Semitism,&nbsp;antipathy toward Christianity, and their multicultural fetish for accommodating the unassimilating&nbsp;Muslims in their midst&nbsp;at the expense of everyone else, I don't think we're going to be able to depend on NATO.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76047</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76047</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:51:34 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Grumpy on 2008-07-31</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[My suggestion, at the end of the &quot;Armorer's&quot; article, there is a link &nbsp;to the total report. Do yourself a favor and read it. GEN McCaffrey did the impossible, he talked of the future Commander in Chief, without getting political. General, WELL DONE! I believe it should be mandatory reading for all of our national politicians and/or candidates for National public office. My view, both of these men are about equally qualified for the POTUS. I respect Sen McCain and his service during Viet Nam, but that very same service does not necessarily qualify him for the POTUS position. This is not Viet Nam and McCain's dependence on his POW status, may actually work against him, that was then and this is now. A clean slate may be a good thing, many things won't need to be unlearned for this new type of war. But that clean slate better pick the best dang advisors across the WHOLE SPECTRUM OF ISSUES!&nbsp;<br />
<br />
GEN McCaffrey, you have made sense out of this insane asylum. Thank you.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76046</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76046</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:37:56 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from The Armorer on 2008-07-31</title>
            <description>
                Oooo! A Freeperlanche, courtesy Dawnsblood! Hi guys and gals! I see it didn&apos;t take long over there for someone to dismiss the General based on his unfortunate tenure as Drug Czar...

C&apos;mon, weigh in, don&apos;t be shy.  Just be polite!
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76045</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76045</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:14:41 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2008-07-31</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<p>True enough, Frank - diplomat won't work.&nbsp; He's going to have to be a *<em>statesman</em>,&quot; since being able to do the seemingly impossible is the distinguishing mark between the two.<br />
<br />
As has been mentioned here before, I believe by Kat, and perhaps others in comments...&nbsp; if what McCaffrey says is true, those who want to run (after the election is safely secured, of course) will point to things like that to justify it.</p>
<p>And if they succeed at that, we'll have so spent our moral capital that you could make the argument to me that we have become such an inconstant ally, that we simply should disestablish the capability for offensive action and retreat to our own shores.</p>
<p>Not that it would work.&nbsp; The busybodies would still be busy telling us what to do.&nbsp; Feh.&nbsp; I wish I was young and optimistic again.&nbsp; Facing down the Russkis was simple work.</p>]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76038</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76038</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:45:26 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from fdcol63 on 2008-07-31</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[I was, of course, referring to the task of securing increased NATO commitments to actively engage the Taliban and AQ in Afghanistan.<br />
<br />
I think it matters a LOT who is our president&nbsp;so far as committing <em><strong>America</strong></em> to the task of accomplishing the mission in Afghanistan.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76037</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76037</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:34:11 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from MaryAnn on 2008-07-31</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<blockquote>
...there is at least a hard a slog ahead in Afstan as we've seen in Iraq,
</blockquote><br />
Much, much harder. Unfortunately.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76036</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76036</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:28:59 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from fdcol63 on 2008-07-31</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Personally, I don't think It will&nbsp;matter whether our president is Obama or McCain. I'm not sure there's <strong>ANY</strong>&nbsp;politican who's enough of a diplomat to accomplish this task.<br />
<br />
Unless and until NATO&nbsp;countries experience horrific terrorist attacks on their own soil - larger than the ones we saw on 9/11 or in Spain and Britain, since even <em><strong>those</strong></em> didn't&nbsp;change their ROE - we are unlikely to see a substantial increase in the willingness of those NATO countries not currently committed to actively engaging the Taliban and AQ.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76035</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76035</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:27:11 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from kat-missouri on 2008-07-31</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Afghanistan tribal politics are like Iraqi Tribbles (not a mis-spelling) on steroids.&nbsp; More, everywhere, without any clear central leadership and don't piss anyone off.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76034</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/07/general_r_mccaf.html#comment-76034</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:54:28 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>

