previous post next post  

The First Forty Seconds

The Iraqi helicopter pilots I’ve been training in the sim are a fairly mixed group, but they all have two things in common: they’re older (most of them are Iran-Iraq War vets) and they’ve had some training in instrument flight.

But, “have had some training in instrument flight” doesn’t necessarily equate to “have had some training within the past ten years.” Some accumulated actual weather time in Britain, France or Russia during an overseas aircraft qual -- I’ve heard a couple of interesting stories about the dimensions of thunderstorms in Russia and the severity of clear-air turbulence over France. And I can tell who’s flown in Britain -- the first time a Brit-trained pilot climbs into an overcast layer in the sim, he invariably mutters, “Oh. My. Gaaaahhd…”

Inadvertent Instrument Meteorological Conditions, or IIMC for the Acronym Aficionados (hi, Barb!), means you’ve lost visual reference without intending to do so. Although they’re all a tad startled that I can turn the weather to crap as fast as it can happen in the Real World, the pilots who’ve had a lot of actual weather time don’t get fazed much. The ones who are good settle right down. The inexperienced ones, wellllllll…

IIMC onset can be slow -- you keep pressing on and the weather keeps getting worse and the visibility decreases so slowly that you’re in the trap before you realize it (that’s how JFK Junior bought it -- and that’s how multiple-vehicle smashups happen in bad weather). Or IIMC can happen fast -- you’re flying at night and punch into a cloud or a dust / snow / rain storm catches you. The weather itself isn’t usually the killer, though -- it’s how you *react* to the loss of visual reference. If your control touch isn’t what it should be, if you fixate on one instrument instead of scanning the important ones, or if the startle reflex kicks in, you will probably -- make that *definitely* -- take the aircraft into what’s understatedly-referred to as an Unusual Attitude.

Rather than go through all the physiological explanations for what happens when your brain is deprived of it's primary sensory input for keeping you upright (and I *can*), try this little experiment -- make sure you’re near something soft -- stand up, extend your arms, close your eyes and tilt your head to one side.

Now lift the leg opposite the head-tilted side.

You’ve just gone into an Unusual Attitude.

However, when you’re descending sideways at rates in excess of 3,000 feet-per-minute, even *water* is hard as granite.

The FAA did a study some years back and found that most pilots killed themselves (and everyone else on board) within forty seconds of entering an unusual attitude if they didn’t get the aircraft level. Do that properly and you've solved your immediate airspeed, altitude, descent rate and bank angle problems and you can work out the rest in (relative) safety.

So, one of the things I teach *all* the guys who come up here from Taji is How To Survive the First Forty Seconds -- because if they can level the aircraft and get their airspeed under control within that time, they’ll probably live through the rest of the flight, even though it’ll still be pretty -- ummmmm -- exciting. The main problem they have to overcome is overcontrolling -- making the initial correction too large and then overcompensating for it. Then overcompensating for the overcompensation, then overcompensating for the -- you get the idea.

I show them unusual attitudes and why they happen. I show them how to recover smoothly and *fast* without overcontrolling the aircraft.

I show them how to fly with three fingertips, not their entire hands.

How well do the *really* inexperienced guys absorb that? Watch.

No, that's *still* not my normal, conversational voice...

16 Comments

Well, you still sounded pretty calm to me - which I'm sure is why he was able to follow your guidance and regain control. Good instructin', Bill :-)
 
When Mike Monaghan taught me to land the bird in my Aerial Observer days ("I'm not dying of a heart attack just because you can't land this bird!" was his justification) that looked at lot like one of my *better* days. Except that Monaghan kept saying, "Bend the bird and I'm going to hit you, El-tee." in that same, quiet voice Bill uses... with the overlay of violence promised.
 
...in that same, quiet voice Bill uses. Venting in the cockpit may feel good, but it's counterproductive -- the guy's already jittery and hollering just compounds the problem. Throw in the fact that English may be his *third* language and you might as well be talking to the instrument panel. I use the same phrases and cadences that the Iraqis use -- and *you* wouldn't understand me saying, "Khe-fek, sh'weh-sh'weh-sh'weh." Makes it interesting when the Gazelle guys start answering me in French...
 
I've found that the people that can truly handle an emergency are those whose voices get calmer in the situation.
 
I remember discussing the finer points of the M-21D sniper system (a long time ago, I know...!) to some troops in a jungle environment who answered me in French instead of their native language. Turns out their last "go-to-guy" had a French passport and legion experience, but had been born in an eastern European country. I wonder where the French Foreign Legion hasn't been...?
 
Recognize. Confirm. Recover. Rinse. Repeat. Works for me in all types of aircraft, as I'm sure you've told them about 1.2 million times. As for calm voices in a crisis, listen to the old Edwards AFB test pilot tapes. "OK. Starting the departure procedure..." (At about 35,000 feet) "OK. I'm now in a flat spin." "Fairly violent." "Would be disorienting to most." (helmet camera doesn't quite capture the pilot's head bouncing off the canopy but it is, heh) "Beginning the recovery procedure." (Pause) "Well, that didn't work." (Passing thru 25,000) "I'll try this." (Pause) "Well, that didn't work." (passing thru 20,000) "Lemme try this." (Pause) "Well, that didn't work." (passing thru 15,000, sink rate exceeds instrumentation capabilities; only telemetry and ground video capable of following the stalled jet's downward trajectory) Passing thru 10,000, Mission Controller starts yelling "Bail out. Bail out! Bail out!" "OK, guess I'll have to step over the side on this one." (Pause) Mission Control: "Good 'chute, roll the trucks." Jock touches down 1.5 seconds after full canopy deploys (that's what a good sink rate will do and is why the minimum ejection altitude for uncontrolled egress is 10K AGL). It's faster than an autorotation scenario but they both have their own kinds of pucker factors. I'll tell you what's challenging (for me anyway, and I have thousands of hours of jet time)--transitioning to VMC in the last few seconds of a no-shite CAT I ILS. As the F/O, I fly it down to mins then transition to a visual flare/land. The MD-11 is so big that you enter ground effect at about 200' AGL. This is the same altitude that you pop out of the clag on a CAT I. So, you re-cage your brain and eyeballs to visual conditions, outside the cockpit, while consciously having to prevent the descent rate from slowing due to ground effect while the ILS tolerances go to just a few feet up/down/left/right. The scan is inside-outside-inside-outside until you are truly clear of clouds (~100') while pushing forward on the stick (collective to you, Bill) over the overrun to fight the ballooning in ground effect (counterintuitive). But fun!
 
...while pushing forward on the stick (collective to you, Bill) Nope, that's "cyclic" to me. If I push forward on the collective, all I'll do is overspeed the governor, slew the searchlight, activate the wirecutter for the TOW or turn the landing light on. Depends on what I'm strapped into at the time. Shooting an ILS in a helicopter is the *legal* way to bust minimums (by about fifty feet, depending on your descent rate. A little aerodynamic phenomenon known as "dishout" -- which got me on the ground at BWI when the *birds* were walking...
 
Cyclic. I said "Cyclic" but my fingers typed something else. Yeah, that's it...
 
I've used that excuse myself, on occasion. "Somatogravic. I said 'somatogravic.' It only *sounded* like I said 'proprioceptive'..." *sigh* With equal lack of success...
 
As for calm voices in a crisis, listen to the old Edwards AFB test pilot tapes. ATC started saving the tapes of my transmissions after my second #1 hydraulic system failure in a Cobra. "Trenton Tower, Guard 347, emergency. I've got a Number One hydraulics failure, negative directional control, requesting duty runway for a running landing." "Roger, 347, you've got 34, full length. CFR is rolling -- do you want foam on the runway?" "347, negative, sir -- Ops wants to videotape it to see if the sparks show through the smoke cloud when we touch down. Evidently, it was pretty spectacular the last time..." Heh.
 
In Tom Wolfe's The Right Stuff, he noted that the test pilots at Edwards would all mimic Chuck Yeager's laconic summaries of the emergency and slow, southern drawl. No matter what the problem, even if they were from Haavahd, Mass or Noo Fu**in' Yawk, they still made an attempt to sound like--and fly like--the Great One.
 
"347, negative, sir -- Ops wants to videotape it to see if the sparks show through the smoke cloud when we touch down. Evidently, it was pretty spectacular the last time..." So did the sparks show through?
 
Bill, it looks like you are earning your pay. Btw, I assume you are in a sim by the steady camera shot. If so how much can you throw at your “stoodents” at any given time.
 
So did the sparks show through? Only for the first hundred feet. The smoke got too thick. Leger -- I'm *behind* the sim. It's visual-only, but I can reproduce anything weather-related (they all want to "fly" in snow), including a pretty good Force Nine turbulence illusion. Give me ten seconds and I can have them at the middle marker on an ILS into Baghdad in a sandstorm with 30-knot winds, 500 meter visibility and a stuck tail rotor. Which I haven't done yet, because nobody's at that level of proficiency, and probably won't be until they get at least two more sim sessions under their belts. Hey! You just gave me an idea...
 
Hey, Bill, I just got done re-rereading Richard C. Kirkland's "War Pilot" and was wondering if you were any relation to the 2LT Bill Tuttle mentioned therein. That Tuttle was Kirkland's co-pilot on a record-breaking cross-country flight in a Sikorsky H-19 in December 1955. I know you can't be that old, but hey, it could be your Dad or a favorite uncle whose footsteps you followed.
 
Ummmm, didn't the Polish aeromedical pioneer Dr. Bairanay (sp?) invent a fancy 3-dimensional swivel chair just so the mind-warping sensation of these unusual attitudes could be practiced safely, with no danger more severe than one's own puke on one's uniform? Maybe we should get back to that simple device. You could buy a personal chair for every pilot in the military for what we spend on one 3-D simulator.