<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for Old guns, new guns.  A little gunner zen.</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2010</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/old_guns_new_gu.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/old_guns_new_gu_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:27:46 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>Old guns, new guns.  A little gunner zen.</title>
            <description>First up, something new... just because I like the pic. U.S. Marine 1st Lt. Kathryne B. Schilling coaches a woman as she prepares to shoot a pistol during her training to become a Sister of Ferris, June 4, 2008, Ferris, Iraq. The Sisters of Ferris will inspect women for weapons, suicide vests, large amounts of cash and contraband at entry control points. Schilling is assigned to Combat Logistics Battalion 1, 1st Marine Logistics Group. U.S. Marine Corps photo by Lance Cpl. Cindy G. Alejandrez Next, something old. John S. an enabler who feeds my habit gun dealer sent me a...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/old_guns_new_gu.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/old_guns_new_gu.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 08:46:48 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2008-06-16</title>
            <description>
                Actually, CAPT H, I&apos;m pretty sure the NLOS-C was designed by a committee.

TNG - I thought the same thing - but in the full size picture, it&apos;s more obvious that she&apos;s clear of the slide - unless she has a weak grip, then she&apos;ll get bit anyway.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/old_guns_new_gu.html#comment-74324</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/old_guns_new_gu.html#comment-74324</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 06:47:36 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from TheNewGuy on 2008-06-16</title>
            <description>
                The lovely Sister of Ferris is about to get bitten by the &quot;slide viper&quot; if she doesn&apos;t get her weak-side thumb out of the way.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/old_guns_new_gu.html#comment-74320</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/old_guns_new_gu.html#comment-74320</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 04:57:01 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from J.M. Heinrichs on 2008-06-16</title>
            <description>
                Did I mention it was probably designed to satisfy &quot;Gunners&quot;?

Cheers
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/old_guns_new_gu.html#comment-74316</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/old_guns_new_gu.html#comment-74316</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 03:42:46 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from J.M. Heinrichs on 2008-06-16</title>
            <description>
                Artillery &apos;point weapons&apos; means the pointy end usually returns to earth first.

Neffi- there&apos;s purposeful, functional, etc; here the &quot;builders&quot; abused the privilege.

Cheers
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/old_guns_new_gu.html#comment-74315</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/old_guns_new_gu.html#comment-74315</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 03:39:25 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2008-06-15</title>
            <description>
                And Chuck wins the &quot;Who&apos;s gonna bring up Bueller?&quot; contest!
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/old_guns_new_gu.html#comment-74303</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/old_guns_new_gu.html#comment-74303</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 15:59:08 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Neffi on 2008-06-15</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<em>It looks like they built it from the inside out and once they hung everything the engineers said they needed to make it work, they just bolted plate on it to keep the rain out.</em>
...and that's *exactly* the way military stuff should be built, IMHO. It's designed to hurl sudden, violent death onto the Ranks of the Ungodly- it doesn't need to be *purty*.
Tho, yeah- it's spugly as helk.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/old_guns_new_gu.html#comment-74302</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/old_guns_new_gu.html#comment-74302</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 15:45:52 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Fishmugger on 2008-06-15</title>
            <description>
                Spugly is what Spugly does.

Brings me back to when I worked for a computer printer manufacturer and when a new printer came out we salesmen had to rate and forecast it:

1. If it was Ugly and worked we could sell it.
2. If it was pretty and didn&apos;t work we could sell it.
3. But...if it was ugly and didn&apos;t work it was an anchor.

OK...they need to work on the form factor. It looks like they built it from the inside out and once they hung everything the engineers said they needed to make it work, they just bolted plate on it to keep the rain out.

No amount of Candy Apple Red paint, racing stripes and chrome sprocket wheels is gonna pretty that thing up. Looks like the same team that designed the M-113 Personnel Carrier finally got a new job.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/old_guns_new_gu.html#comment-74301</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/old_guns_new_gu.html#comment-74301</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 14:56:33 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Foxfier on 2008-06-15</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Since blogger doesn't do track-backs:
<a href="http://sailorette.blogspot.com/2008/06/sister-of-ferris-ferris-iraq.html" rel="nofollow">Head Noises: Siser of Ferris</a>

I LOVE the picture!  Gives one hope.
]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/old_guns_new_gu.html#comment-74300</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/old_guns_new_gu.html#comment-74300</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 13:52:59 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Chuck Simmins on 2008-06-15</title>
            <description>
                The only thing the Sisters of Ferris lack are some wheels.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/old_guns_new_gu.html#comment-74299</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/old_guns_new_gu.html#comment-74299</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 13:09:14 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Fred on 2008-06-15</title>
            <description>
                Yeah, it&apos;s spugly as anything seen in a video game. The video game generation will take to it.
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/old_guns_new_gu.html#comment-74297</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/old_guns_new_gu.html#comment-74297</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 12:11:06 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Neffi on 2008-06-15</title>
            <description>
                Looks like the bore evacuator on that M109 needs a new O-ring...
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/old_guns_new_gu.html#comment-74296</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/old_guns_new_gu.html#comment-74296</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 11:24:01 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from BillT on 2008-06-15</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<em>- and shooting artillery at "point targets" was a way to get your knuckles wrapped when I was a Lieutenant</em>

Yeah, if you were *bad* at it. I plunked a 105 round into a five-gallon pail on the third adjustment.

Unfortunately, it was Danger *Really* Close and a chunk of steel the size of my forearm decapitated the BC scope...]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/old_guns_new_gu.html#comment-74295</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/old_guns_new_gu.html#comment-74295</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 11:10:42 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>


