<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Comments for Nuremberg, Osama and Obama</title>
        <description>We&apos;re the Military and Airpower Guys of Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online + a stray we found wandering around looking lost.  All original material JHD, BHD, JR, WT,  and KA 2003-2007</description>
        <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/nuremberg_osama.html</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/nuremberg_osama_rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:27:38 Z</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Movable Type 4.12</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>

        <item>
            <title>Nuremberg, Osama and Obama</title>
            <description>[Kat] (Moved by ry to the proper day) I&apos;ll start very simply: Who thinks that Osama bin Laden will be captured alive to stand trial? Leave your answer in comments. Now, on with the commentary. While I understand Obama&apos;s lawyerly obsession with Nuremburg as the epitome of trying war criminals, it is obviously a safe answer to give because there is a less than .01% probability that Osama will be taken alive. Thus, Obama panders to his base while never likely to have to test his policy in reality. It is very much more likely that Osama will meet his...</description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/nuremberg_osama.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/nuremberg_osama.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:57:13 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>

        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from BillT on 2008-06-21</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<em>Happily for me I doubt he could even find my country with both hands and a brace of bloodhounds.</em>

Isn't New Zealand a Blue State, like the rest of New England?

*putting extra shoring in the bunker*]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/nuremberg_osama.html#comment-74550</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/nuremberg_osama.html#comment-74550</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 04:09:23 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Murray on 2008-06-20</title>
            <description>
                If you want a president who thinks Jerusalem is the capital of Israel then go nuts, he&apos;s your boy. Outstanding potential for foriegn policies there I&apos;m thinking.

Otherwise you know where to cast your vote.

Happily for me I doubt he could even find my country with both hands and a brace of bloodhounds. 
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/nuremberg_osama.html#comment-74545</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/nuremberg_osama.html#comment-74545</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 21:45:08 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from fdcol63 on 2008-06-20</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[And they'll be armed with the most powerful <strong>subpeonas</strong> that America's finest legal minds can produce.

Bin Laden will soil his pants!]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/nuremberg_osama.html#comment-74533</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/nuremberg_osama.html#comment-74533</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:01:34 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from fdcol63 on 2008-06-20</title>
            <description>
                Hey, I heard Obama&apos;s going to try to avoid Bush&apos;s failure at Tora Bora by invading Waziristan with 2 whole divisions of US Army and Marines. And without worrying about Pak nukes or destabilizing the tenuous political situation with the Islamist radicals in Pakistan.

As soon as his aides can teach him how many personnel are in 2 divisions!  LOL
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/nuremberg_osama.html#comment-74531</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/nuremberg_osama.html#comment-74531</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:57:04 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from kat-missouri on 2008-06-20</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Oh..nearly forgot, let's go into Pakistan because, well, you know that war is going to be a "cake walk" and, at least, if people died, it won't be because somebody lied or we sold our allies down the river.

Of course, we'll go it alone..you know, <em>unilaterally</em>, because NONE of our allies will be coming along for that ride.

That Obama is pure USDA cowboy!]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/nuremberg_osama.html#comment-74530</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/nuremberg_osama.html#comment-74530</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:38:38 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from kat-missouri on 2008-06-20</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<blockquote>Of course, first we have to have a president who's interested in catching Osama, right? Then we worry about the trial.</blockquote>

Dude, isn't it the problem now?  Everybody waited until we had people in custody before setting out the rules and regulations under which they would be identified and then tried by the tribunal?  Isn't that your complaint from yesterday?  You know, holding them so long it creates a habeas situation that only the Supreme Courts and the Chosen can fix?

]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/nuremberg_osama.html#comment-74529</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/nuremberg_osama.html#comment-74529</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:33:34 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from John of Argghhh! on 2008-06-20</title>
            <description>
                [reaches for more popcorn]
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/nuremberg_osama.html#comment-74528</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/nuremberg_osama.html#comment-74528</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:13:29 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from fdcol63 on 2008-06-20</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Oh, wait ..... Yasin is still loose after 15 years, but the law enforcement approach that Obama and the Left advocate was so effective that he was <strong>released due to inadequate evidence</strong>, and he then <strong>fled to Iraq</strong> where he was <strong>harbored by Saddam</strong> - although the Left assures us there were no terrorists in Iraq before BushCo invaded in 2003.

It's hard to keep up with the Left's contradictory arguments. Which story are they using today?]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/nuremberg_osama.html#comment-74526</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/nuremberg_osama.html#comment-74526</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:37:10 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from fdcol63 on 2008-06-20</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[<blockquote>"Of course, first we have to have a president who's interested in catching Osama, right?"</blockquote>

You know, I don't understand the Left's obsessive mocking of Bush's failure to catch OBL.  I thought the Left's argument has been that 9/11 was an "inside" job perpetrated by the evil cabal of BushCo, and that the whole "war on terror" thing was bogus.

Perhaps we'll find OBL when we finally catch Abdul Rahman Yasin - who Clinton still has not found <strong><em>15 years</em></strong> after the first WTC attack in 1993.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/nuremberg_osama.html#comment-74525</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/nuremberg_osama.html#comment-74525</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:29:54 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Jason on 2008-06-20</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Of course, first we have to have a president <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/14/barnes-osama/" rel="nofollow">who's interested in catching Osama,</a> right? Then we worry about the trial.

]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/nuremberg_osama.html#comment-74522</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/nuremberg_osama.html#comment-74522</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:53:10 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Casey Tompkins on 2008-06-20</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Does Obama mean the Nuremberg trials which were conducted <i>ex post facto</i>, and were hence illegal according to Common Law?

That sounds like his sort of gig.
]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/nuremberg_osama.html#comment-74521</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/nuremberg_osama.html#comment-74521</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:51:37 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from AW1 Tim on 2008-06-20</title>
            <description>
                
   I firmly believe that Osama is dead, and has been for a couple of years. Had he been alive, he would have appreared in any number of recent videos. As it is, all we are ever fed is still pictures of him from the past, and patched-together audio tracks, sections of which are lifted from earlier speeches.

   If, by some miracle, he is still alive, then i would strongly suggest that he is no longer in the ME, but somewhere in Africa, most likely Somalia.

     Respects,
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/nuremberg_osama.html#comment-74511</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/nuremberg_osama.html#comment-74511</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 08:12:22 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from Ledger on 2008-06-20</title>
            <description>
                Kat, I am beginning to wonder if Obama any meaningful knowledge of history. Judging from what he has said about the “57 states” I am doubtful he does. 


            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/nuremberg_osama.html#comment-74508</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/nuremberg_osama.html#comment-74508</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 07:00:55 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Comment from fdcol63 on 2008-06-20</title>
            <description>
                <![CDATA[Obama is ignorant, with a 9/10/01 "law enforcement approach to terrorism" mentality:

from Powerline Blog
<a href="http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/2008/06/020784.php" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/2008/06/020784.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/2008/06/020784.php</a></a>

Obama (June 16, 2008):

<i>"It is my firm belief that we can track terrorists, we can crack down on threats against the United States. But we can do so within the constraints of our Constitution. Let's take the example of Guantanamo. What we know is that in previous terrorist attacks, for example, the first attack against the World Trade Center, we were able to arrest those responsible, put them on trial. They are currently in U.S. prisons, incapacitated."</i>

 
Andrew McCarthy (the lead prosecutor of the perpetrators of the 1993 WTC attack) comments:

<i>This is a remarkably ignorant account of the American experience with jihadism. In point of fact, while the government managed to prosecute many people responsible for the 1993 WTC bombing, <b>many also escaped prosecution because of the limits on civilian criminal prosecution</b>. Some who contributed to the attack, like Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, continued to operate freely because they were beyond the system’s capacity to apprehend. <b>Abdul Rahman Yasin</b> was released prematurely because there was not sufficient evidence to hold him — <b>he fled to Iraq, where he was harbored for a decade (and has never been apprehended)</b>.</i>

Fled to Iraq? Harbored by Saddam Hussein? Before the US invasion?  This contradicts the assertion by Obama and the Left that there were no terrorists in Iraq before the war.]]>
            </description>
            <link>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/nuremberg_osama.html#comment-74507</link>
            <guid>http://www.thedonovan.com/archives/2008/06/nuremberg_osama.html#comment-74507</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 06:56:31 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>

