previous post next post  

H&I Fires* 19 June 2008

Open post for those with something to share, updated through the day. New, complete posts come in below this one. Note: If trackbacking, please acknowledge this post in your post. That's only polite.

You're advertising here, we should get an ad at your place...

Time to add a new caveat, because from email it's not clear to some folks (mind you, if you don't read this it won't matter...) Being an open post, people (collectively, the Denizens) other than I post in the H&I. They sign their work (most of the time) - keep that in mind when you want to flame someone in email please - if it doesn't say "The Armorer" or "John" then I didn't write it! And honestly - if you don't like something said or posted... leave a comment, and hash it out (within the context of The Rulez which are clearly posted on the comment form, I would add).

********************************
Regarding my post yesterday about General Casey's message outlining how we're going to change the system to make sure that the guys doing the work relevant to the current style of warfare get rewarded and protected for doing that work - Chapomatic notes that the Navy just doesn't get it. I wonder if the Salamander will weigh in? Neptunus Lex already has. Nor have we heard from the Air Force...
************************************

The desultory website redesign is looking like it will go live this weekend, with a temporary shutdown to let the web-gnomes in to do their thing. The developmental version is up - click here and tell us what you think. The intent was to get a new look, clean up the clutter, make the archives both easier to use and less a drag on bandwidth. Talk to us about colors, ease of use, or problems you see. Some photos in some posts may not display, that's an artifact of "leeching" protections. -the Armorer

********************************

Meet Cameron Sands. Thug. Idiot. Darwin Award Nominee. H/t, Kevin. -the Armorer

*********************************

An interesting take on the presidential race from Canadian columnist John Ibbitson:

The biggest concern over the possibility of Barack Obama becoming president has been his complete lack of executive experience.

History tells us, however, that this may not matter. What matters is whether Mr. Obama or John McCain has the capacity to grow.

...

A pattern emerges. A new president arrives clearly unequipped to meet the demands of the office. He makes mistake after mistake, his popularity wanes and the pundits prepare his political obituary.

But the president has the capacity to analyze each failure with a clear head. He discovers which advisers he can trust, which policies he should jettison or embrace. He figures out the Congress. The successes of the second half of his first term vindicate the learning curve of the first.

Other presidents obstinately determine to stay the course, and we get what we have now.

Ibbitson goes through presidential records from Lincoln, to Truman, to Kennedy, to Clinton in order to make his point. I'm not sure his analysis is spot on, but it's an interesting starting point for a discussion of how much experience matters versus temperament. - Damian

*********************************

*A term of art from the artillery. Harassment and Interdiction Fires.

Back in the day, when you could just kill people and break things without a note from a lawyer, they were pre-planned, but to the enemy, random, fires at known gathering points, road junctions, Main Supply Routes, assembly areas, etc - to keep the bad guy nervous that the world around him might start exploding at any minute.

Not really relevant to today's operating environment, right? But, it *is*

The UAVs we fly over Afghanistan and Pakistan looking for targets of opportunity are a form of H&I fires, if you really want to parse it finely. We just have better sensors and fire control now.

I call the post that because it's random things posted by me and people I've given posting privileges to that particular topic. Another term of art that might be appropriate is "Free Fire Zone".

27 Comments

Phibian is traveling until the 25th, so you have a wait to get his opinion. He is posting new stuff via Blogger's new Scheduler feature. http://cdrsalamander.blogspot.com/2008/06/sunday-funnies_15.html
 
John, I couldn't help but notice you have switched to the "English" camo colours. At least, the khaki and light bronze green are the colours i am seeing at the new site. Personally, I have some trouble seeing the text on the khaki. If it were to use the same font and size as what's curently en vogue here, then it'd be fine. It's just my tired old eyes, though, so what it means to me is I will simply meed lonmger time to read what's on the screen with the new style. I also think it appears to be "too" clean. I sunno, more like a Field Manualm or some business site. Not that there's anything wrong with that, bit this old look, t me at least, is comfortable with it's mild clutter, like someone's home, a place where you feel at home. Again, that's just me and I'm a little resistant to change :) It is well done, however, and very clean and precise. So there's that. Respects,
 
Nah, Tim - that's exactly the kind of input we want.
 
I like the new look, it is a lot cleaner and easier on the eyes (at least my eyes.) The fonts look crisper and have more contrast so they are easier to read. I'm not crazy about the colors but it's not an interior design site so that doesn't matter that much to me. I'd give it a 9 out of 10 on a grumpy day and this isn't one so as far as I'm concerned it's a 10.
 
What color combos *would* you guys prefer? Or point us to websites that you like in that regard?
 
Love the redesign. Much cleaner and tighter from my standpoint - easier to read and navigate. Hopefully the search function will work once again? *fingers crossed* And unlike the other commenters so far, I *like* the colours.
 
Like the new site. Would advise slightly lighter color for right sidebar background, for contrast with font, and a slightly "chunkier" font. At least on my monitor (1280x1024) it is pretty fine-grain and I think that might be causing the readability issues
 
It loads faster, and, while I've sorta gotten used to the pink background, grey makes it easier on the eyes. It looks a bit sterile, but that's prolly because there aren't any pictures in the pos Oh. There *are* pix in the posts. Some of the pictures in some of the posts don't show up correctly Ummm...or at all.
 
I was hoping to hear something like that from you Bill - that it loaded faster, etc. I was *expecting* the snark.
 
John, I have no problems with the new colours. I like them as well, in a colonial ANZACs uniform sort of way. My suggestion would be to consider using white letters on the page, or at least perhaps in the right hand side to increase the contrast. Two of my cisually favourite sites are "Warseer" and "The Daily Grail". Both use black background with white text and some other colours thrown in on various sections. That sort of contrast is actually easier on the eyes, at least for me, then the lighter coloured backgrounds. But I digress. Anyway, I have no complaints, per se, about the new look. I have personal biases, but it is, after all, your site, and I will never be so boorish as to be invited to visit someone's domain and then complain about the decor. The French might, but not me. L) respects,
 
I have personal biases, but it is, after all, your site, and I will never be so boorish as to be invited to visit someone's domain and then complain about the decor. The French might, but not me. :) Ah, but Tim - you've been *invited* to do so - so it's all good. It's my site, but it's awful lonely just sitting here by myself - so, as a consumer of the product, your opinions are solicited. This isn't a commie blog - "There is only 1 way, and you will like it!" There's some wiggle room. Siddown, Ry.
 
Heh. Other presidents obstinately determine to stay the course, and we get what we have now. And history will be the judge, not the punditry of the day. Time will be the ultimate judge, not Mr. Ibbitson. Even if he turns out to be correct. Which isn't yet a given.
 
As I said, John, I'm not sure I agree with his analysis, but it does provide a good starting point for the conversation. The shot at Dubya was Ibbitson's, not mine (...I says to the big man with the large stock of weapons and ammo). I think the biggest mistake Ibbitson makes is to separate experience and judgment. Unless my life observations are completely off base, judgment largely stems from experience...
 
re: new site. i'm fine with the colors, but i strangely have a preference for the hard break between days on the current format. re: lack of executive experience. yeah, like Lincoln never had to herd cats when running a militia company (Blackfoot war)
 
EXCELLENT new look! Must be the brilliance of your web-master. Just sayin'! ML
 
The successes of the second half of his first term vindicate the learning curve of the first. The only success I can recall in the second half of Clinton's first term was getting stains out of the carpet. And the biggest success of the second half of the second term was scoring the Air Force One china. His learning curve was a doozy -- of course, the Dem's overall learning curve hit -y and stayed there.
 
Heh. In case no one notices, Mike's daughter is *married* to the web-gnome. Man, that's shameless, even for you Mike! 8^ D
 
Hmmm... Interesting that our Canadian friend uses the possessive "we" in referring to the U.S. President. I would rather see the good journalist spend a little time examining the state of freedom of speech in the Great White North (see Steyn, et al) before he starts casting his elitist gaze to U.S. politics.
 
RetRsvMike's got a good point about the hard break defining the dailies. I don't get out much, but the Castle's the only place I remember seeing it. Gives the joint a pretty unique look. Plus it helps when I'm trying to remember what *day* it is...
 
Yeah, if nothing else, keep thre hard break.
 
new site...a little more room between lines of writing on the posts? Maybe I'M getting old, but some of that was running together (not literally)
 
Reinstituting the hard break between days may slow access, as they represent different bins to load. For those of you with dial-up, etc, what's the difference between load times? Some of the other tweaks will still reduce load times, but I thought I should lay that out directly. We can certainly experiment with it.
 
There's some wiggle room. Siddown, Ry. Oh, right, so there's no Instalanchers around so it's back to kicking gollum, is it? haven't even looked yet at the test site.
 
Thanks much for the link! We really don't get it. Congress forced us to make FAOs in '97 but we screwed it up and had to do it all over again in '05. The new try seems to be sticking, but IAs are a mess that is only now beginning to clear up a little.
 
The new look is more readable (to me) than the current one. I'd be reluctant to muck about with it too soon. See how it sets for a while. Please.
 
I would like it better if the [Read More]s didn't push you to a whole new page like Blogspot rather than opening the text in place. That format may make it leaner and faster loading, but makes it hard to peruse the H&I* Fires postings. On those, all you see is the post heading boilerplate and have no idea whether anything interesting lies beneath. I know that there is always "something" beneath, but how much and whether it has been added to is the question.
 
Interesting that our Canadian friend uses the possessive "we" in referring to the U.S. President. Actually AW1 Tim, I'm not sure you can snark that line too much. Like it or not, everyone in the world gets to live with the consequences of American voting decisions. When your economy sneezes, Canada gets a cold. When your president decides to go to war, it affects the nations who choose to go with you, and those who choose not to. And when he decides NOT to go to war, that impacts the rest of the world as well. The benefits of being the big kid on the block are many. But the downside is that you in America live in a fishbowl, and the rest of us get to comment on it because what you do affects us so very much.